Truth

The post you shared from LindellTV (associated with Mike Lindell and featuring reporter Cara Castronuova) describes a recent confrontation where Castronuova questioned Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) as he exited a January 6-related hearing. She pressed him on topics like the death of Rosanne Boyland, accountability for January 6 events, his "autopen pardon," and potential future legal consequences for those involved in J6 (including himself). According to the post and similar recent shares on X, Raskin did not respond to any questions and walked away, prompting Castronuova's parting remark: "Thank you for the lies, Congressman. Keep spreading the propaganda."

This aligns with recent activity: Castronuova, now White House correspondent for LindellTV and a contributor to outlets like The Gateway Pundit, has been vocal on J6 issues for years. Recent X posts (from today, January 15, 2026) share the same or similar video clips of her confronting Raskin, describing her as a "truth warrior" pushing back against what they call lies from Raskin and former J6 committee members.

### Context on the Key Issues Raised

- **Rosanne Boyland's death**: Boyland died during the January 6, 2021, Capitol events. Official medical examiner reports concluded it was accidental acute amphetamine intoxication (drug overdose), with crowd crush contributing as she collapsed near the lower west terrace tunnel. Some conservative sources and activists (including Castronuova) allege police involvement, citing video of an officer (Lila Morris) striking a motionless person on the ground with a baton, claiming it contributed to or caused the death. Fact-checks and official accounts maintain it was not homicide by police, and no charges resulted from that specific action.

- **Accountability for January 6**: This remains highly partisan. Raskin was a key member of the House January 6 Select Committee, which investigated the attack as an insurrection. Hearings continue into 2026 (e.g., recent ones marking the 5-year anniversary and addressing pardons).

- **"Autopen pardon"**: In January 2025, outgoing President Biden issued preemptive pardons to members of the J6 committee (including Raskin) to shield them from potential future prosecution under the incoming Trump administration. Some critics (including Trump allies) claimed these were invalid if signed via autopen (a mechanical device for signatures). Raskin and others dismissed those claims as baseless, with no evidence they were voided.

- **Future legal consequences**: With Trump back in office and having pardoned many J6 defendants, the dynamic has shifted. Raskin has spoken out against broad pardons for rioters and called for hearings on related issues (e.g., crimes by pardoned individuals or hiring of former rioters in federal roles). No prosecutions of J6 committee members have occurred.

The video appears authentic based on matching descriptions and shares today, but it's from a strongly partisan source (LindellTV, tied to election fraud claims and pro-Trump/MAGA perspectives). Raskin has not publicly addressed this specific exchange in available recent coverage, consistent with politicians often avoiding ambush-style questions outside formal settings.

If this is the "truth" you're asking about, the core event (the unanswered confrontation) seems to have happened recently, but the framing and implications are heavily interpretive depending on political viewpoint. If you have the direct video link or more details, I can dig further!

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals