Monday, December 8, 2025

Watch "You Won’t BELIEVE Why HUNDREDS of Woke Attorneys Just RESIGNED!!!" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/SP1QMH0VJKs?si=KcinuUCNxkI1GzYW

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
on No comments:

Beetroot juice

Dr. Gundry generally views beets with caution, seeing them as a "sugar beet" due to their sugar content, especially cooked; however, his products, like the Enhanced Circulation Formula, use beetroot for its nitrates to boost nitric oxide and improve blood flow, but emphasize it's combined with other polyphenols and antioxidants (like cocoa) to mitigate risks, as nitrates from animal protein mixed with beet nitrates could form carcinogens, highlighting that plant-based antioxidants are key to safely harnessing beet benefits. [1, 2, 3]  
Key Gundry Perspectives on Beets: 

• High Sugar Content: Gundry notes beets, like carrots, release sugar when cooked, making them less ideal than raw, as their cell walls break down. 
• Nitrates for Circulation: He acknowledges beets' high nitrate content helps produce nitric oxide, widening blood vessels, which is why it's in his circulation-boosting formulas. 
• Polyphenol Synergy: His approach focuses on combining beets with other plant compounds (flavonoids, cocoa) to maximize benefits and neutralize potential negative interactions, especially concerning nitrates and animal protein. 
• Raw vs. Cooked: He suggests consuming beets raw is better than cooked to avoid the sugar spike, though his focus remains on their overall polyphenol profile. [1, 2, 3, 4]  

In Summary: Dr. Gundry sees potential benefits in beets (nitrates for circulation) but treats them cautiously due to their sugar, often recommending them within his specific formulas that balance them with protective plant compounds. [1, 2, 3]  

AI responses may include mistakes.




Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
on No comments:

Faking

The "junk" and the funky colors in ionic foot baths are primarily the result of a normal electrochemical reaction (rusting) of the machine's metal parts, not toxins being pulled from your body. The process happens whether feet are in the water or not. [1, 2, 3]

The Science Behind the Color

Here is a breakdown of what actually causes the water to change color:
  • Electrolysis and Corrosion: The machine works by running a low-voltage electrical current through the salt water via an "array" (an electrode made of metal, often stainless steel). This process, called electrolysis, causes the metal in the array to corrode or rust very quickly, releasing metal ions (like iron oxide) into the water.
  • Water Composition: The natural mineral content and impurities in the tap water itself (e.g., iron, calcium, chlorine) react with the electrodes and the salt, which contributes significantly to the color changes and residue.
  • Salt: Salt is added to increase the water's conductivity and allows the reactions to occur.
  • Presence of Feet: When feet are submerged, the oils from the skin, dead skin cells, and a user's unique acid/alkaline balance can slightly alter the appearance and texture of the residue, making it a bit stickier than water-based residue. [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
Scientific Evidence

Multiple studies and investigations have debunked the claim that the colors represent bodily toxins.
  • Experiments without feet: Researchers have demonstrated that the water turns the same murky brown color even when the machine runs without any feet in the basin.
  • Lab analysis: Water samples analyzed after sessions primarily showed high levels of iron (rust) and no detectable amounts of common bodily waste products like urea or creatinine.
  • Urine and hair samples: A study published in the Journal of Environmental and Public Health tested participants' hair and urine samples before and after a series of ionic foot baths and found no change in toxin levels in their bodies. [2, 3, 8]
In summary, the color change is a visual spectacle resulting from a basic chemistry experiment, not evidence of detoxification. Your body has efficient natural systems (liver and kidneys) for filtering and eliminating actual toxins. [1, 2, 9]


AI responses may include mistakes.


Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
on No comments:

Plants

### Is PlantWave Real?

Yes, PlantWave is a **real product and company**—it's not a complete fabrication or vaporware. The website you linked (plantwave.com) is legitimate in the sense that it's an active e-commerce site selling a physical device that's been around since at least 2018 (domain registered then), with over 13,700 reported users. However, it's marketed with some pseudoscientific flair around "plant music" and "biofeedback," which blurs the line between innovative art/tech gadget and hard science. I'll break it down based on how it works, the evidence, user experiences, and potential red flags.

#### What It Is and How It Works
PlantWave is a small sensor device (~$299 USD) that clips electrodes onto a plant's leaves or stem. It detects tiny fluctuations in the plant's electrical conductivity (micro-volts from ion movements in cells, influenced by light, touch, water flow, or photosynthesis). These signals are graphed as waves, converted to MIDI data, and translated into ambient sounds via a companion app (iOS/Android). 

- **Output**: Real-time "music" like chimes, flutes, or drones—more activity means more notes; calm plants produce slower, droning tones. It's generative (never repeats exactly) and customizable (e.g., switch to 432 Hz tuning or pentatonic scales).
- **Tech Roots**: Based on open-source bio-sonification (e.g., early work by engineer Sam Cusumano in 2011). The company (founded by artists Joe Patitucci and Alex Tyson via their label Data Garden) patented their algorithm for turning plant data into expressive sounds. It's like a high-tech wind chime, but triggered by plant biology instead of air.
- **Use Cases**: Marketed for meditation, relaxation, or creativity. Users report feeling "more connected to nature," and it's been used in art installations (e.g., Philadelphia Museum of Art) and even concerts where live plants "perform."

From demos (including official videos), it demonstrably produces sounds tied to plant stimuli—if you touch the plant or shine a light, the "music" shifts in real time. No pre-recorded audio; it's all procedural.

#### The Science: Legit Concept, But Overhyped Claims
The core idea—plants have measurable electrical signals—is **scientifically sound**. Plants do generate bioelectric potentials (e.g., action potentials up to 100 mV) as part of cellular communication, similar to (but slower than) animal nerves. Tools like this use sonification (a NASA-approved data visualization technique) to make invisible data audible, much like turning weather radar into beeps.

However:
- **No Evidence Plants "Sing" or Communicate Musically**: The sounds are an artistic interpretation, not what plants "sound like" naturally. Scientists emphasize it's not intentional music—plants don't have ears or intent; the device just amplifies random electrical noise into pleasing tones. Claims of plants "responding to people" or "expressing emotions" echo debunked 1970s experiments (e.g., The Secret Life of Plants) that couldn't be replicated.
- **No Peer-Reviewed Studies on Benefits**: The company admits no rigorous trials yet, just user surveys showing relaxation (e.g., "feels meditative"). They're partnering with institutions for future research, but current "proven benefits" are anecdotal.
- **Skepticism from Experts**: Biologists call it "pseudoscience" for implying deeper sentience without proof. One Reddit thread quotes a doctor: "The whole story has nothing to do with science or the sound of plants."

In short: The hardware works as advertised for sonification, but don't buy it expecting to "hear your plant's soul"—it's more bio-art than botany breakthrough.

#### User Reviews and Legitimacy
- **Positive Side**: Many love it for mindfulness or novelty. On X (Twitter), recent posts (as of Dec 2025) show excitement—e.g., users sharing "palm tree music" or adding it to wishlists. Official demos get shares for their chill vibes. Trust scores vary: Scamadviser (79/100, "very likely safe") and Scamdoc (90/100, low risk).
- **Negative Side**: Complaints about poor support, faulty units (e.g., won't power on out-of-box), iOS-only recording (Android users feel misled), and hidden customs fees for international shipping. Trustpilot (3/5 from 2 reviews) calls it a "scam" due to unposted bad reviews and returns issues. Reddit threads (e.g., r/gardening, r/ElectroBOOM) label it "vaporware" or "overpriced MIDI hack." Scam Detector gives it 57.6/100 ("medium-risk") for spammy vibes.

The company offers a 30-day return policy and 1-year warranty, but enforcement seems spotty. No major lawsuits, but some users threaten class actions over defects.

#### Bottom Line: Worth It?
- **If You're Curious**: It's a fun, real gadget for plant lovers or ambient sound enthusiasts—think of it as a $300 nature sound machine. Start with their free app trials or YouTube demos to test the vibe.
- **Red Flags**: Exaggerated marketing, spotty support, and high price for what's essentially electrodes + an algorithm. Skip if you want proven science or flawless reliability.
- **Alternatives**: DIY versions using Arduino (~$20-50) replicate the basics via open-source guides. Or try apps like "PlantWave-inspired" MIDI tools without hardware.

If this is a gift (noted from the fbclid tracking param, likely a Facebook ad), it could delight someone into bio-art—but vet returns first. Got more details on why you're asking?

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
on No comments:
on No comments:

Gundry MD

Dr. Gundry generally advises against most grains due to lectins, but his approved "bread" is Barely Bread, a grain-free, lectin-free substitute made from almond flour, coconut flour, egg whites, and other non-grain ingredients, highlighting his focus on avoiding lectin-rich foods like wheat, oats, and even many traditional whole grains. He's very strict on grains like oatmeal, even organic ones, but his core philosophy is to avoid lectins, meaning most traditional bread/grain products are off-limits, focusing instead on nuts, seeds, vegetables, and lean proteins. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]  
Grains & Breads Dr. Gundry Advises Against (or with Caution): 

• Wheat, Oats, Barley, Rye: Most traditional breads and grains are high in lectins, which he considers harmful to the gut. 
• Oatmeal: He specifically advises against it, even organic versions. [2, 4, 6, 7]  

Dr. Gundry's Approved "Bread" (Grain-Free): 

• Barely Bread: This is his go-to, grain-free, lectin-free bread alternative, made from almond flour, coconut flour, egg whites, and other lectin-free ingredients. [1, 2, 3]  

What to Focus On Instead (Gundry Style): 

• Nuts & Seeds: Macadamia nuts, walnuts, hazelnuts, pistachios, and almond/coconut flours (as in Barely Bread) are key. 
• Healthy Fats: Olive oil, MCT oil, avocado. 
• Proteins: Pasture-raised eggs, goat/sheep yogurt. 
• Vegetables: Leafy greens and other lectin-free vegetables. [1, 2, 4, 8]  

In essence, if it's a traditional grain-based bread or cereal, Dr. Gundry says no; if it's grain-free and lectin-free (like his Barely Bread or a diet focused on nuts/veggies), he says yes. [1, 2, 4]  

AI responses may include mistakes.




Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
on No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)