Thursday, June 18, 2026

Why Philip Sarnecki’s Proven Business Success Makes Him the Better Choice for Kansas Governor

By Henry McClure | June 2026

A couple of weeks ago I wrote about why business experience is so valuable in government. The core idea was simple: when people have actually built companies, met payrolls, created real value for customers, and faced real consequences for failure, they bring a different, more rational mindset to public service. They focus on results, efficiency, return on investment, and growth instead of just protecting the system or getting re-elected.

Let’s apply that same lens to the race for Kansas governor.

I believe Philip Sarnecki would be a stronger governor than Ty Masterson precisely because of his deep, successful business experience. And while I respect President Trump, I don't respect his endorsement of Ty Masterson, and I’m disappointed. Sarnecki is far closer to the kind of outsider businessman Trump himself asked us to support back in 2015 and 2016 — someone who built something real from the ground up, not another politician who has climbed the ladder inside the system for two decades.

The Same Theory, Now for All of Kansas

Kansas faces real challenges. Our population growth has been slower than the national average. We’ve seen net domestic outmigration in recent years. Economic performance rankings lag behind our potential, even as our outlook has improved somewhat thanks to recent reforms. Too many young people and families still leave for better opportunities elsewhere. Property taxes, regulations, and the overall cost of doing business and raising a family can feel heavy.

These aren’t abstract problems. They affect real people in Topeka, Shawnee County, and across the state who want their kids and grandkids to be able to build good lives here.

The solution isn’t more of the same political management. It’s bringing the same kind of practical, results-driven thinking that works in successful businesses. That’s exactly what Philip Sarnecki offers.

Philip Sarnecki: A Kansas Business Builder With a Real Track Record

Sarnecki rose from humble beginnings — the son of a janitor and a secretary — to build one of the largest financial services firms in the country. He founded and led RPS Financial Group, growing it to 18 offices (12 in Kansas), serving clients in all 50 states, managing over $10 billion in assets under management in Kansas alone, and paying out more than $135 million in dividends to Kansas families and businesses in its final year under his ownership.

He later sold the company successfully. Today he owns and operates multiple businesses across Kansas and beyond — including being the largest franchise owner of Strickland Brothers 10 Minute Oil Change with locations in towns like Andover, El Dorado, Derby, Pittsburg, Fort Scott, and Independence. Altogether, his companies employ nearly 1,000 people. He’s created jobs, served Kansas families directly, and generated real economic activity in communities big and small.

He’s never held elected office. He’s a true outsider who says plainly: “Like President Trump, I’ve never run for office before, but I’ve built a great, successful business. It’s time to bring a business approach to government and shake up the system. We have got to get away from the career politician mindset.”

His platform focuses on exactly the things that flow from real business experience: shredding red tape so small businesses can grow, lowering taxes for families and employers, creating good-paying jobs, bringing accountability to how government spends money, and making sure our kids have reasons to stay and build their futures in Kansas.

Ty Masterson: Long Political Experience, Smaller Business Footprint

Ty Masterson has served in the Kansas Legislature for over 20 years — first in the House, then the Senate since 2009, and as Senate President since 2021. He has deep knowledge of how the legislative process works and a conservative record that President Trump praised when he endorsed him. Masterson also has a background as a small business owner (realtor and construction), which is more private-sector experience than many career politicians.

However, that construction business ultimately failed, leading to a bankruptcy filing in 2011. His primary career has been in elected office and legislative leadership in Topeka. That gives him strengths in relationships, process, and passing conservative legislation — but it also makes him part of the very insider system that too often protects itself rather than delivering bold results for working Kansans.

This is the contrast the business-experience theory highlights. One candidate scaled a major financial services company that directly served and enriched thousands of Kansas families and then built additional job-creating businesses across the state. The other has spent most of his adult life inside government.

Why Trump’s Endorsement Missed the Mark Here

I understand why President Trump endorsed Ty Masterson. He values strong conservative leadership on taxes, regulation, energy, agriculture, border security, and fighting the radical policies coming out of the current administration. Masterson has been part of advancing some of those priorities in the Senate.

But Trump’s own 2015-2016 appeal was built on being the successful businessman outsider who would shake up a broken system in Washington. Philip Sarnecki is running on that same promise at the state level: “I’m just a Kansas dad, husband and businessman who is tired of Republicans losing in Kansas… We’re going to win and we’re going to win big.”

When the choice is between a proven large-scale job creator and business scaler versus a long-time legislative leader, the business-experience argument points clearly toward Sarnecki if we actually want different outcomes — faster job growth, lower burdens on families, more opportunity so people stay in Kansas, and government that operates with real accountability instead of just managing the status quo.

Let’s Keep It Simple for Voters

If your family or business is feeling the weight of taxes, regulations, or limited opportunity, or if you’re worried your kids might have to leave Kansas to get ahead, this race matters.

Think of it like hiring for an important job. Would you rather give the role to the person who has spent 20 years inside the same organization learning its rules and relationships, or the person who has repeatedly built successful operations from scratch, created hundreds of jobs, and delivered measurable value to thousands of customers?

Kansas is that organization right now. We need someone who knows how to grow the enterprise, cut what isn’t working, and create the conditions for success — not just someone skilled at navigating the existing system.

Philip Sarnecki has done the first in the private sector on a meaningful scale. He wants to bring that same approach to state government.

The Stakes for Kansas Families

We’ve seen some positive movement in Kansas’s economic outlook rankings thanks to recent reforms. But our actual performance on population retention, employment growth, and domestic migration still shows we have a long way to go if we want Kansas to be a place where families thrive and young people choose to stay.

Philip Sarnecki’s entire message is about changing that trajectory: lower taxes, less red tape, more jobs, more opportunity, and government that works like the successful businesses he has built. That’s the practical path to a stronger Kansas where more people can afford to live, work, and raise their families here.

I’ve spent decades in real estate and development watching how government decisions either help or hinder real economic activity on the ground. The difference between insiders managing the system and outsiders who have actually built things is often the difference between slow incremental change and real turnaround.

Kansas has the potential to win big. Philip Sarnecki is offering to bring the mindset and record that actually wins in the real economy.

If you agree that Kansas needs more business-style results and less career politics, I encourage you to take a close look at Philip Sarnecki in the August Republican primary.

What do you think? Have you followed this race? Do rising costs or limited local opportunity affect your family or community? Let’s discuss in the comments. 





Why Business Experience Is Exactly What Topeka Government Needs Right Now – Time for New Blood

 By Henry McClure | June 2026

When I was a kid — I was born in 1959 — government jobs had a certain reputation. They were steady. They had pensions. But let’s be honest: a lot of people viewed them as the spot for folks who couldn’t quite make it in the real world of business. The pay wasn’t flashy, the status wasn’t high, and the ambitious, risk-taking builders were out there in the private sector creating jobs, companies, and value.

Fast forward, and everything flipped. Today, government positions — local, state, and federal — often come with competitive pay, strong benefits, generous pensions, and job security that’s rare in private industry. Recent Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows state and local government workers have significantly higher benefit costs per hour worked (around $25.59 versus $14.01 in private industry). These jobs are now highly coveted. People actively pursue them.

That shift worries me. When government work becomes a prime career destination prized for its perks and stability, we risk losing the hard-nosed, rational, bottom-line thinking that comes from having to make payroll, satisfy real customers, and stay competitive every single day.

Business People Think Rationally Because They Have To

Business experience forces a different lens:

  • Every dollar is someone else’s money that could go elsewhere — so you obsess over return on investment, cutting waste, and delivering value.
  • If costs get out of line or service slips, customers leave and you fail. There’s real accountability.
  • You adapt fast, negotiate tough deals, measure results, and innovate — or the competition buries you.
  • You hire and reward based on performance, not politics or who you know.

Government doesn’t face the same pressures. It can raise taxes and fees, borrow against the future, or grow the bureaucracy without immediate consequences. That’s why we see costs rising in basic services while outcomes sometimes lag.

This isn’t an attack on public workers — plenty are dedicated professionals. It’s about the incentives and mindset at the leadership level. Career politicians and long-term insiders often master navigating the system and getting re-elected. Running government like a successful business requires different skills: fiscal discipline, genuine customer focus (residents are the customers), and a drive to grow the pie instead of just slicing it differently.

Let’s Dumb This Down — Because It Affects Real People

I want to make this simple enough that anyone who’s ever worried about a bill can understand it.

Imagine your car breaks down and you need it fixed to get to work. You have two choices:

  • Your nice friend from church or the neighborhood who’s always been friendly but has never professionally fixed cars.
  • The experienced mechanic with 20+ years, a shop full of tools, references, and a track record of getting it right the first time on budget.

Who do you pick — especially when your family’s income depends on that car running?

Voting for government is the same thing. We’re choosing people to manage our money, our services, and our future. Picking your friend, your neighbor, or the familiar incumbent just because they’re likable or asked nicely is like choosing the buddy over the pro. It might feel good in the moment, but when the higher water bill, slower growth, or missed opportunities hit your family, everyone pays — especially those who can least afford it.

If you’re struggling to pay your water bill today, the people who have been in office the longest helped shape the policies, budgets, rate structures, and decisions that got us here. New blood with real private-sector experience brings the chance to approach problems differently — with fresh eyes and proven tools for efficiency and results.

The Topeka Picture: Rising Costs and Who Pays

Here in Topeka and Shawnee County we’re feeling real pressures. Utility rates have climbed over the years, with recent public discussions about further adjustments and real affordability concerns for residents. When basic services like water keep getting more expensive, it hits hardest the people already stretching to make ends meet. Our county poverty rate sits around 12.7% — thousands of neighbors feel every increase directly in their monthly budgets.

At the same time, we face ongoing questions about economic vitality, attracting good jobs, and keeping young families here so Topeka can be the kind of place the next generation wants to raise their own kids. Long-term incumbents bring continuity, but when costs keep rising and opportunities feel limited, it’s fair to ask whether the same approaches are delivering the best results for working people.

Business experience changes the questions we ask. Someone who’s met a payroll, negotiated real contracts where every dollar matters, analyzed whether a project actually pencils out, and competed in the marketplace understands:

  • How to evaluate development deals and incentives for genuine long-term community benefit, not just short-term headlines.
  • Why predictable, efficient government processes matter for attracting employers and investment.
  • That growing the tax base responsibly spreads costs more fairly than repeatedly raising rates on the same residents.

Patterns from across the U.S. show that governors and mayors with private-sector backgrounds often correlate with stronger economic growth, gains in personal income, shifts toward infrastructure investment, and more disciplined fiscal approaches. It’s not magic — it’s the practical mindset of people who’ve built things in the real world.

A Simple Global Insight

Look around the country and the world. Places that bring business-style rationality into government — treating taxpayer resources with the same care as private capital — tend to see better results: more dynamic economies, better-maintained infrastructure, and policies that encourage work and investment instead of just managing decline.

When government stays captured by career insiders focused on protecting the system and their own positions, you more often get stagnation, rising costs passed down to citizens, and a sense that the deck is stacked against regular people trying to get ahead.

We don’t need to turn government into a corporation. We need leaders who ask the tough, rational questions business demands every day: “Is this the best use of limited resources? How does this create real value for the people paying the bills? What’s the impact on the next generation?”

The Bottom Line for Voters — Especially Those Feeling the Squeeze

Topeka’s future depends on getting this right. If we want a community where families can afford to live, where young people see real opportunity to stay and build lives, and where basic services stay reliable without constantly eating more of people’s paychecks, we need to prioritize proven competence and results over comfort, familiarity, or personal connections.

If you’re one of the folks feeling the pinch — stretching to pay that water bill, watching costs creep up — your vote carries extra weight. Don’t default to the friend or the familiar face. Look at who actually has the experience that translates to running government more effectively: balancing real trade-offs, focusing on outcomes, and bringing a growth mindset instead of protecting the status quo.

New blood with genuine business experience isn’t a magic wand, but it’s one of the most reliable ways to inject rationality, accountability, and practical problem-solving into a system that too often rewards staying the course.

I’ve spent decades in real estate, development, and brokerage here in Kansas and across the country. I’ve seen up close how government decisions ripple through real projects and real families. That’s why this matters to me. We can do better — for the people struggling today and for the Topeka we want to leave our kids and grandkids.

What’s your experience? Have rising costs or local decisions hit your household hard? Drop a comment and let’s keep talking about practical ways to build a stronger, more affordable Topeka.

Sales Tax

Subject: Re: Sales Tax
Karen,
I appreciate the offer to sit down, but there’s a reason politicians prefer not to put things in writing — it creates a record and holds people accountable.
I’m happy to continue this conversation in writing so the residents of District 1 can see exactly where you stand on the misuse of existing sales tax revenue, the $125 million managed by Go Topeka, the repeated failures of their innovation center efforts, and your votes that affect the district.
If you’d rather not address these issues on the record, that’s your choice. But I won’t be doing private off-the-record chats while taxpayer dollars continue to be spent with little results.
Best regards, Henry McClure





From: Karen A. Hiller <khiller@Topeka.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2026 11:21 PM
To: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sales Tax

Hi, Henry -

Your facts are not totally straight in either one of your e-mails.. but you bring up some good points too.  I'm not going to take you on in writing on either, but I'd be happy to sit down some time and chat with you about both.

Best regards,
Karen

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android

From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 17 June 2026 20:48:31
To: Karen A. Hiller <khiller@topeka.org>
Subject: Sales Tax
 
Subject: A Few Business Realities on the Innovation Center Efforts
Dear Karen,
I know you care deeply about economic development in Topeka and are often one of the most vocal voices on these issues. Because of that, I wanted to share a few practical observations about the innovation center projects in the hope they might be helpful.
As you know, BioRealty spent over four years trying to deliver the ASTRA Innovation Center on Kansas Avenue. They purchased the buildings, invested their own time and money, worked with local partners, and repeatedly updated Go Topeka and JEDO. Despite that professional effort, the project did not move forward. That’s a clear sign that even an experienced developer struggled to make the numbers and the partnership work.
Now it appears we are preparing to launch a similar effort — sometimes referred to as “BioRealty 2.0” — this time in the Link Building, with a proposed $9.5 million commitment of sales tax dollars to another group. I’m genuinely curious how we expect this new attempt to succeed where the last one, led by professionals who actually bought the property, could not.
Go Topeka was unable to help BioRealty close the deal over four years. What exactly will be different this time that will allow success in the Link Building? Have the market conditions, leasing economics, construction costs, or partnership terms suddenly become much more favorable? Or are we simply hoping for a different outcome with the same approach?
These are not small dollars. Taxpayer money is finite, and downtown redevelopment projects are complex, expensive, and risky even under the best of circumstances. Before moving forward with another large commitment, it might be wise to take a hard look at why the first effort stalled and what concrete changes have been made to address those problems.
I’m happy to discuss the real estate and development side of these projects in more detail if it would be helpful. Sometimes the view from the development trenches is a little different than it appears from the meeting room.

Best regards,
Henry McClure MCRE, LLC Topeka, Kansas

County

The Dane County government operates entirely independently from the City of Madison. There is no city limit to the county border. Instead, Madison is just one of over 60 cities, towns, and villages nested inside the larger geographic boundary of [Dane County](https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=/m/0ml25). [1, 2] 
If you live in Madison, you are a resident of both the city and the county, meaning you vote in both elections, pay taxes to both entities, and are bound by both sets of laws.
## How the County Government is Run
Dane County uses a county executive-board system, which mirrors the "strong mayor-council" structure of the city but on a regional scale. [3, 4, 5] 

* The Executive Branch (The County Executive): The [Dane County Executive](https://exec.danecounty.gov/) acts as the chief executive officer for the entire county. Elected countywide to a four-year term, the executive manages day-to-day county operations, appoints non-elected department heads, and drafts the multi-million dollar county budget. [3, 6, 7, 8, 9] 
* The Legislative Branch (Board of Supervisors): The [Dane County Board of Supervisors](https://board.danecounty.gov/) is a 37-member legislative body. Supervisors are elected to two-year terms from single-member districts that divide up the county by population. They enact county ordinances, levy county property taxes, and approve budgets. [3, 4, 10, 11] 
* Constitutional Officers: Unlike city governments, Wisconsin state law requires counties to independently elect several specific department heads. These include the County Sheriff, District Attorney, County Clerk, Treasurer, and Register of Deeds. [3, 12] 

## How City and County Borders Interact

* Overlapping Jurisdictions: The physical city limits of Madison do not stop the county's authority. County laws and services still apply inside the city. However, to avoid duplicating work, they divide their responsibilities. For example, Madison Police handle city dispatch, while the Dane County Sheriff manages the county jail and patrols unincorporated highways. [13] 
* Extraterritorial Powers: While Madison has its own strict zoning boundaries, Wisconsin law grants the city "extraterritorial jurisdiction" extending up to three miles beyond its city limits into neighboring towns. This allows the city and county to cooperatively plan out how regional land is developed before it is officially annexed into the city. [14] 

## Who is in Charge of What?
Because the jurisdictions overlap, it helps to see how they split up public services:

| Service / Infrastructure [12, 13] | Who Manages It? |
|---|---|
| Local Roads & Metro Transit | City of Madison |
| Elections & Property Assessments | Both (City handles local voting; County coordinates overall results) |
| Public Health | Jointly operated (Public Health Madison & Dane County) |
| Jail, Courthouse, & Elections | Dane County Government[](https://www.danecounty.gov/government) |
| Dane County Regional Airport[](https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=/m/04y0v7) | Dane County Government[](https://madison.citycast.fm/local-civics/understanding-dane-county-government) |
| Henry Vilas Zoo[](https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=/m/05v3qc) & Alliant Energy Center | Dane County Government |


[1] [https://teamdane.com](https://teamdane.com/Why-Dane/Culture)
[2] [https://madison.citycast.fm](https://madison.citycast.fm/local-civics/understanding-dane-county-government)
[3] [https://slavinmanagementconsultants.com](http://slavinmanagementconsultants.com/PDFs/dane.pdf)
[4] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dane_County,_Wisconsin)
[5] [https://madison.citycast.fm](https://madison.citycast.fm/local-civics/understanding-dane-county-government)
[7] [https://board.danecounty.gov](https://board.danecounty.gov/documents/Dane-County-Overview-UPDATED-5-31.pdf)
[8] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dane_County,_Wisconsin)
[9] [https://www.facebook.com](https://www.facebook.com/DaneCountyBoard/photos/county-government-101-what-does-the-county-board-do-the-dane-county-board-of-sup/1282434270596945/)
[11] [https://www.facebook.com](https://www.facebook.com/DaneCountyBoard/photos/county-government-101-what-does-the-county-board-do-the-dane-county-board-of-sup/1282434270596945/)
[12] [https://www.danecounty.gov](https://www.danecounty.gov/government)
[13] [https://madison.citycast.fm](https://madison.citycast.fm/local-civics/understanding-dane-county-government)
[14] [https://board.danecounty.gov](https://board.danecounty.gov/documents/pdf/reports/webcopy-landuse.pdf)


Henry McClure
785.383.9994 

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android

Strong mayor

Madison, Wisconsin resides in Dane County. The city operates under a strong mayor-council system instead of a council-manager form. While the mayor oversees daily operations and budgets, the legislative body is a locally elected council rather than an appointed city manager. [1, 2, 3, 4]  
City Government (City of Madison) 

• The Mayor: Elected citywide, the mayor is the chief executive responsible for enforcing laws, appointing department directors, and managing daily city operations. 
• The Common Council: The legislative branch consists of 20 democratically elected alders (representatives) who serve 2-year terms. They create city ordinances, approve the annual budget, and set local policies. 
• City Manager: Madison does not have a city manager. The administrative responsibilities fall to the executive mayor and their appointed staff rather than a professional manager. [1, 2, 3]  

County Government (Dane County) 

• The County: Madison is the county seat of Dane County. While city and county governments share some facilities (such as the City-County Building), they are completely separate municipal and county jurisdictions. 
• County Structure: Dane County operates independently, led by an elected County Executive and a 37-member County Board of Supervisors, managing broad, county-wide services like public health, regional zoning, and the county sheriff. [8, 9, 10]  

If you would like to understand how these branches divide specific responsibilities, tell me which city departments (like Police, Parks, or Transit) you'd like to learn more about, or let me know if you are trying to find your specific local representative. 
AI responses may include mistakes.




Henry McClure
785.383.9994 

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android