Sunday, February 22, 2026

Flush Mitch

The X post from @its_The_Dr (Johnny Midnight) shares a screenshot or image of Mitch McConnell's key senior staff list (from his Washington, D.C. office and Kentucky offices), along with contact numbers. It accuses McConnell of involvement in "Ukrainian Kickback Deals" related to U.S. aid to Ukraine and suggests his staff (possibly "liberals") are blocking the **SAVE Act** (often referred to as the SAVE America Act in these contexts). It compares McConnell's condition to Joe Biden's, implying cognitive decline or that staffers are running things.

This reflects a common narrative in some MAGA/Trump-aligned circles on X right now, especially around frustration with Republican Senate leadership stalling election-related reforms.

### On "Ukrainian Kickback Deals"

Claims that McConnell (or other politicians like Biden, Schumer, etc.) received millions in personal kickbacks from Ukrainian officials tied to U.S. aid have circulated widely on social media since at least late 2023/early 2024. These often include viral lists or graphics alleging specific dollar amounts (e.g., $89 million to McConnell).

However, these are **unsubstantiated and repeatedly debunked** as false or baseless misinformation:

- Fact-checks (e.g., from PolitiFact) rate similar claims as "Pants on Fire" false, tracing them to recycled hoaxes without evidence from Ukrainian officials or any credible investigations.

- No official Ukrainian government releases, U.S. investigations (like those from the Ukraine Fraud and Corruption Investigative Working Group), or congressional oversight have produced evidence of such kickbacks to U.S. politicians.

- McConnell was actually one of the strongest GOP advocates for Ukraine aid packages (working with Democrats like Schumer), pushing through billions in military/economic support despite opposition from parts of his party and Trump-aligned figures. He framed it as vital for U.S. national security and emphasized oversight to prevent misuse.

Allegations of corruption in Ukraine aid exist (e.g., concerns about fraud in Kyiv or general oversight needs), but they focus on Ukrainian-side issues or general accountability—not proven personal kickbacks to U.S. leaders like McConnell.

### On Blocking the SAVE Act

The **SAVE Act** (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) is a bill requiring proof of citizenship for federal voter registration (often tied to efforts against non-citizen voting). It passed the House in prior sessions but has faced Senate hurdles.

Recent reports and posts indicate frustration among some Republicans (including Rep. Tim Burchett and others) that McConnell—chair of the Senate Rules Committee (which oversees election-related matters)—or his staff (particularly Legislative Director Tiffany Ge, also Majority Staff Director for the committee) have not advanced or scheduled it for markup/vote. This has fueled claims that staffers are obstructing it, possibly due to McConnell's age/health or political differences (e.g., his past tensions with Trump).

McConnell has stepped back from leadership roles but retains influence via committee positions. Critics in these circles argue this blocks a popular reform (polls show broad support for voter ID/citizenship proof requirements). Supporters of the bill see it as essential election integrity; opponents view it as unnecessary or voter-suppressive.

The post provides McConnell's office contacts, likely to encourage calls pressuring him/staff on the SAVE Act.

Overall, the claims mix real frustrations (e.g., SAVE Act delays in the Senate) with unsubstantiated conspiracy elements (kickbacks). If you're looking to verify staff details, contact info, or bill status, official Senate sources or Congress.gov would be reliable. Let me know if you'd like more on any part!

Henry McClure

785.383.9994

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android

Watch "STOP Everything! If You Use WINDOWS 11, You Need to Watch This NOW!" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/JCbdNyFb4MM?si=8Y-Ul_pHV-recmPb

Henry McClure
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

Saturday, February 21, 2026

faceless facebook

# Facebook: The Eternal High School Cafeteria That's Ruining Your Life

Imagine being trapped in high school forever—a never-ending loop of petty drama, superficial judgments, and endless gossip, where every interaction feels like a popularity contest judged by an algorithm. That's Facebook in 2026: a digital purgatory that masquerades as connection but delivers isolation, rage, and regret. Launched as a way to "connect the world," it has devolved into a toxic swamp where billions waste precious hours, amplify hate, and convince themselves they're living while their real lives atrophy. If you're still scrolling, it's time for a wake-up call. Facebook isn't just a platform; it's a parasite on your time, your mind, and society at large.

## The Time Sink: Hours Vanished into the Void

Let's start with the cold, hard numbers. The average Facebook user spends about 32 minutes a day on the platform, though some estimates peg it higher at around 40 minutes daily for active users. That might sound innocuous—after all, what's half an hour? But multiply it out: that's over 3.5 hours a week, or more than 180 hours a year. For context, that's equivalent to binge-watching an entire TV series multiple times over, except instead of entertainment, you're doom-scrolling through ads, arguments, and acquaintances' filtered fantasies.

And that's just Facebook-specific time; when combined with overall social media usage, people rack up an average of 18 hours and 36 minutes per week across platforms. In the U.S., adults average 31 minutes daily on Facebook alone, often split between phone and PC, leading to a cumulative drain that infiltrates every spare moment. Younger users aged 18-24 clock in at 22 minutes a day, while those 55-64 push it to 45 minutes. These aren't productive minutes; they're stolen from reading a book, calling a friend, or simply staring at the sky. Facebook's design—endless feeds, notifications, and autoplay videos—hooks you like a slot machine, turning "just checking" into hours evaporated.

Worse, this time theft creates an illusion of productivity. You think you're staying informed or connected, but you're not. You're trapped in an echo chamber, refreshing for dopamine hits that never satisfy. As one study notes, excessive use leads to "perceived insomnia" and disrupted sleep, compounding the waste by leaving you groggy and unproductive the next day.

## The Hate Factory: Spreading Venom at Scale

Facebook isn't just wasting your time; it's poisoning the well of human discourse. Hate speech and misinformation thrive here like weeds in an untended garden. A staggering 67% of internet users have encountered hate speech online, with Facebook cited as the primary culprit by 58% of them. Despite Meta's claims of progress, hate speech prevalence hovers at 0.10%-0.11% of content views—a seemingly small number until you consider the platform's scale, where billions of views mean millions exposed daily.

Misinformation is even more rampant. In the lead-up to the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack, Facebook hosted over 650,000 posts questioning election legitimacy, averaging 10,000 a day. Visual misinformation alone accounts for 23% of political image posts. During the COVID-19 pandemic, global misinformation networks racked up 3.8 billion views on Facebook in just one year. This isn't accidental; algorithms prioritize outrage to boost engagement, turning civil discussions into battlegrounds. Hate speech isn't just words—it's linked to real-world violence, from lynchings to ethnic cleansing. Facebook's half-hearted moderation fails spectacularly, removing only a fraction proactively while the damage spreads unchecked.

In this environment, users become unwitting vectors for vitriol. What starts as a "like" spirals into echo chambers of division, where high school-style cliques form around conspiracy theories and bigotry. It's not connection; it's combustion.

## Missing Life: The Illusion of Enjoyment in a Digital Prison

Perhaps the cruelest trick Facebook plays is convincing you you're enjoying yourself while your real life slips away. Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) is rampant, compelling constant checks that disrupt sleep, work, and relationships. Users report higher anxiety, depression, and loneliness from excessive scrolling, with those spending over three hours daily on social media doubling their risk of mental health issues. Facebook access in college settings led to a 7% increase in severe depression and 20% in anxiety disorders.

This isn't hyperbole. Social media replaces genuine interactions with superficial ones, reducing emotional support and heightening isolation. You think you're "catching up" with friends, but you're staring at screens instead of faces. Deactivating Facebook for a month boosts happiness and life satisfaction while cutting depression. The platform's addictive design—triggering dopamine rushes—mirrors gambling, pulling you back for more "rewards" that leave you emptier.

In essence, Facebook traps you in an eternal high school: comparing yourself to curated perfection, dodging bullies in comments, and wasting potential on popularity metrics. You're not living; you're performing for an audience that doesn't care.

## Break Free: Reclaim Your Time and Sanity

Facebook's empire is built on your addiction, profiting from your misery while society pays the price. It's time to log off—not just limit, but delete. Studies show cutting social media to 30 minutes a day slashes anxiety and FOMO. Rediscover real connections, unfiltered joy, and the quiet satisfaction of a life unlived online. The world outside your feed is waiting—don't let Zuckerberg's high school reunion steal it from you.

Thursday, February 19, 2026

Fw: NOTICE: March 3, 2026 Governing Body Meeting Agenda

From: City of Topeka, Kansas <no-reply@topeka.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2026 3:19 PM
To: mcre13@gmail.com <mcre13@gmail.com>
Subject: NOTICE: March 3, 2026 Governing Body Meeting Agenda

View this email in your browser

City of Topeka E-Notify

You are receiving this because you asked to be notified when City of Topeka shares City Council related information.

The March 3, 2026, Governing Body Meeting Agenda is posted online here: https://topeka.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=1

MEETING LOCATION:
City Council Chambers
214 SE 8th Street, 2nd Floor
Topeka, Kansas, 66603

MEETING TIME:
6:00 p.m.

Addressing the Governing Body: Public comment for the meeting will be available via Zoom or in-person. Individuals must contact the City Clerk's Office at 785-368-3940 or via email at cclerk@topeka.org by no later than 5:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting at which time the City Clerk's Office will provide Zoom link information and protocols prior to the meeting.

View the meeting online at https://www.topeka.org/communications/live-stream/ or at https://www.facebook.com/cityoftopeka/.

Written public comment may be sent to the City Clerk's Office located at 215 SE 7th Street, Room 166, Topeka, Kansas, 66603 or via email at cclerk@topeka.org on or before the date of the meeting for attachment to the meeting minutes.

Agendas are available by 5:00 p.m. on Thursday in the City Clerk's Office, 215 SE 7th Street, Room 166, Topeka, Kansas, 66603 or on the City's website at https://www.topeka.org.

Additional City Council information is located at https://www.topeka.org/citycouncil/

Privacy is important to us. Subscriber information will not be shared with anyone. Subscribers only receive the information requested.

Copyright © 2026 City of Topeka, Kansas, All rights reserved.
You subscribed to one or more e-Subscription lists asking to receive news and updates.

Our mailing address is:

City of Topeka, Kansas

215 SE 7th Street

City Hall Building

Topeka, KS 66603

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

20260215_155500-CINEMATIC_MOMENT_VIDEO.mp4

Henry McClure
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

RE: Look at this

Good morning, Henry.

Thank you for sharing the information regarding how other communities structure and market their economic development tools.

With respect to comments about governance structure, those matters would need to be directed to the JEDO voting board members, as policy decisions rest with the County Commission and City Council representatives serving in that capacity.

Thank you,

Leigha Boling

Economic Development Director

City of Topeka

215 SE 7th Street, Topeka, KS 66603

lboling@topeka.org

Phone: (785) 368-0974

NOTICE: This message and any attachments may be confidential and contain legally privileged information. If you are not an employee of the City of Topeka (see K.S.A. 75-6102(d)), we do not waive any legal protection that may apply such as attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the message and any attachments. Further, this communication is not intended to constitute, nor should it be relied upon, as legal advice to you.

From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2026 11:19 PM
To: Leigha Boling <lboling@topeka.org>; Spencer Duncan <sduncan@topeka.org>; MCRE Media <mcre1.9999@blogger.com>
Subject: Look at this

Notice: -----This message was sent by an external sender-----

Leigh,

We need to look at taking the land away for Go Topeka and put it in the Land Bank

This is Lawrence

The **Catalyst Incentive Program** is a special, temporary economic development initiative by the City of Lawrence, Kansas, designed to attract and support **new industrial projects**. Launched in 2017 (with expansions and renewals over time), it provides streamlined, expedited incentives for qualifying developments to stimulate growth, particularly in designated business parks and industrial-zoned areas.

### Key Features and Incentives

The program offers an automatic "basic assistance package" for projects meeting minimum eligibility criteria, with approvals handled directly by the City Commission for faster processing. Core components of the **Catalyst Business Park Assistance** package include:

- **10-Year Real Property Tax Abatement**: 50% abatement on the increased property value from the project; increases to **70%** if the building achieves LEED Silver equivalent standards (certification not strictly required, but encouraged for the higher rate).

- **Industrial Revenue Bond (IRB) Financing**: Includes a **sales tax exemption** on construction materials and equipment used in the project.

- **Land Assistance** (in select cases): City- or county-owned land provided at **no cost** for projects in Lawrence VenturePark or East Hills Business Park.

Additional perks may apply based on project specifics, such as location on brownfield sites (which can help toward LEED goals) or expansions of existing buildings (abatement applies only to the expanded portion).

### Eligibility Criteria

The program targets **new spec development** (speculative buildings ready for tenants) or **full build-out industrial projects**. Minimum thresholds vary by location:

- **Lawrence VenturePark**: New buildings ≥75,000 sq ft with ≥$5 million capital investment.

- **East Hills Business Park**: New buildings ≥25,000 sq ft with ≥$1.6 million capital investment.

- **Building Expansions** (anywhere): ≥15,000 sq ft added with ≥$1 million investment.

- **IG-Zoned Land Citywide**: New buildings ≥25,000 sq ft with ≥$1.6 million investment.

Projects must be industrial in nature and meet other city economic development standards. Spec or full-build projects hitting these marks qualify automatically for the base package.

### Program Status and Sunset

This is explicitly a **temporary program**. It is set to **sunset on April 1, 2025**, meaning no new applications or approvals will be accepted after that date unless the City Commission extends or replaces it. (As of early 2026, available information confirms the sunset has passed or is imminent, with no indications of renewal in recent public records.)

The program has been used for various industrial projects since inception, contributing to job creation and investment in Lawrence's business parks.

### Comparison Context (to Topeka)

Unlike Topeka's more general, discretionary fee reductions (capped at 25% via City Manager approval for economic projects), Lawrence's Catalyst Program focused on aggressive, predefined tax abatements and exemptions tailored to industrial growth. It offered fuller, longer-term relief (e.g., 50-70% property tax breaks over 10 years plus sales tax exemptions) but was limited to industrial sectors and specific sites—making it more targeted and generous in those areas than Topeka's broader but shallower approach.

For the most current details (especially post-sunset status or any successor programs), check the City of Lawrence's official economic development page at lawrenceks.gov/ed/catalyst or contact their Economic Development division directly. Lawrence continues to offer other incentives through programs like affordable housing policies or general IRBs.

Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Look at this

Leigh,

We need to look at taking the land away for Go Topeka and put it in the Land Bank

This is Lawrence

### Key Features and Incentives

- **Industrial Revenue Bond (IRB) Financing**: Includes a **sales tax exemption** on construction materials and equipment used in the project.

- **Land Assistance** (in select cases): City- or county-owned land provided at **no cost** for projects in Lawrence VenturePark or East Hills Business Park.

### Eligibility Criteria

The program targets **new spec development** (speculative buildings ready for tenants) or **full build-out industrial projects**. Minimum thresholds vary by location:

- **Lawrence VenturePark**: New buildings ≥75,000 sq ft with ≥$5 million capital investment.

- **East Hills Business Park**: New buildings ≥25,000 sq ft with ≥$1.6 million capital investment.

- **Building Expansions** (anywhere): ≥15,000 sq ft added with ≥$1 million investment.

- **IG-Zoned Land Citywide**: New buildings ≥25,000 sq ft with ≥$1.6 million investment.

Projects must be industrial in nature and meet other city economic development standards. Spec or full-build projects hitting these marks qualify automatically for the base package.

### Program Status and Sunset

The program has been used for various industrial projects since inception, contributing to job creation and investment in Lawrence's business parks.

### Comparison Context (to Topeka)

LOOK

Topeka and Lawrence, two mid-sized Kansas cities, both offer economic development incentives to attract projects, spur growth, and address challenges like rising construction costs and housing needs. However, their approaches to **development fee waivers** (such as building permits, planning applications, or related charges) differ in scope, flexibility, and focus.

### Topeka's Approach to Development Fee Waivers

Topeka provides limited, discretionary fee relief primarily through its Municipal Code (Section 109.6). The City Manager has authority to **waive or reduce fees up to 25%** for qualifying economic development projects. This is reviewed case-by-case, based on project scope, type, and public benefit—such as job creation, redevelopment, or community impact.

- This tool supports broader economic initiatives, including commercial, retail, or mixed-use developments tied to tools like Community Improvement Districts (CIDs).

- Examples include potential waivers for infrastructure-related costs or specific affordable/charitable housing scenarios (e.g., past discussions on emergency or nonprofit housing).

- Waivers are not automatic or full; they cap at 25% and require approval, reflecting a cautious, performance-oriented stance.

- Topeka's incentives emphasize consistency across projects, with no broad full waivers standardly available outside targeted cases.

This limited flexibility helps offset developer burdens from inflation and high construction costs but stops short of aggressive relief to avoid straining city revenues.

### Lawrence's Approach to Development Fee Waivers

Lawrence offers more targeted and sometimes fuller fee waivers, often integrated into specific programs like affordable housing incentives or industrial development.

- For **affordable housing**, the city has a dedicated policy (including a 2025 draft Affordable Housing Incentive Policy) that allows **planning and development fee waivers** to promote 99-year affordable units for households at or below 80% Area Median Income (AMI). These waivers can be full or substantial when projects meet criteria like income-restricted units and public benefits.

- Recent examples include the City Commission approving an $80,000 fee waiver for the 9 Del Lofts II project in East Lawrence (2025), conditional on adding more affordable units to boost eligibility for state tax credits.

- The **Catalyst Incentive Program** (temporary, sunsetting in 2025 for new industrial projects) waives city application fees and Industrial Revenue Bond (IRB) origination fees for qualifying industrial developments.

- Waivers appear more project-specific and generous in sectors like housing and industrial growth, often tied to broader incentives (e.g., grants, land donations, or tax abatements) under the city's Economic Development Policy.

Lawrence's framework prioritizes equity, affordability, and targeted sectors, enabling fuller waivers in high-priority areas compared to Topeka's percentage-based cap.

### Key Comparison

- **Scope and Generosity** — Topeka caps at 25% discretionary reduction (via City Manager approval), making it more conservative and broadly applicable to economic projects. Lawrence allows potentially full waivers in focused programs (e.g., affordable housing or industrial), providing stronger relief for aligned developments.

- **Focus Areas** — Topeka ties waivers to general economic development (e.g., CIDs, redevelopment). Lawrence emphasizes affordable housing and industrial growth, with recent actions showing willingness to waive significant fees (e.g., $80,000 cases) to secure state/federal leverage.

- **Consistency and Process** — Both require case-by-case review and alignment with policy goals. Topeka stresses uniform application to avoid favoritism; Lawrence integrates waivers into structured policies (e.g., housing toolkit or Catalyst program) for transparency.

- **Impact on Developers** — Amid rising costs (e.g., 4-6%+ annual construction inflation), Lawrence's targeted full waivers may better "give a pass" in priority sectors, potentially attracting more housing or industrial deals. Topeka's 25% cap offers meaningful but partial help, encouraging projects while protecting city funds.

Both cities use waivers strategically to combat economic pressures and foster growth without broad tax hikes. Lawrence appears more aggressive in housing-related relief, while Topeka maintains a balanced, limited approach suitable for diverse projects. For specific proposals, developers should consult current city policies, as incentives evolve (e.g., Lawrence's Catalyst sunsetting in 2025). Contacting economic development offices in either city can provide tailored guidance.

CID

Topeka Residents: Rally for Community Improvement Districts and Fee Waivers to Fuel Equitable Growth

**By Henry McClure, Topeka Resident and Advocate**

TOPEKA, Kan. – As Topeka stands on the brink of significant revitalization, Community Improvement Districts (CIDs) emerge as a vital tool for driving economic development without imposing immediate tax burdens on residents. These districts, enabled by Kansas law, facilitate targeted investments that spawn new projects, generate employment, and elevate our community's overall appeal. With developers grappling with unprecedented challenges like skyrocketing construction costs and persistent inflation, now is the time for Topeka to not only champion CIDs but also waive development fees to ensure inclusive, sustainable progress for all.

CIDs function as specialized districts designed to fund enhancements in designated areas, typically via a modest sales tax addition—ranging from 1% to 2%—levied exclusively within the district. This isn't a citywide tax increase; it's a focused charge on transactions from the new development, ensuring no upfront costs to existing taxpayers. The essence is simple: Without the project, there's no tax. But with a CID, Topeka gains thriving retail, commercial, or mixed-use spaces that might otherwise remain unbuilt.

The incentive power of CIDs is transformative. In areas plagued by blight or underuse, developers often encounter financial hurdles that render projects unviable. By redirecting a share of the project's future sales tax to cover costs like infrastructure, utilities, or site work, CIDs close these gaps. This "but-for" mechanism guarantees that developments proceed only with district support, converting dormant sites into vibrant economic hubs. Take the 911 Walnut project at SW 32nd Terrace and Topeka Boulevard, which utilized a 2% CID sales tax to attract $15 million in investment, including fresh dining and shopping options.

The rewards for Topeka are undeniable: soaring property values, job creation, and amplified local tourism and facilities. All this without tapping general funds or hiking taxes across the board today—the income stems directly from the project's vitality, creating a symbiotic benefit for developers and the community.

To harness CIDs' full potential, Topeka must enforce a uniform policy. The city's guidelines, revised in 2025 through Resolution No. 9625, detail a review process by a committee and governing body, with sales tax rates up to 2% in increments. Yet, inconsistencies arise, raising equity issues. When the city awards a 2% incentive to prominent or government-supported ventures—like the California Crossing Shopping Center CID—that benchmark should extend to all eligible projects, irrespective of the developer's profile or project size. Uniformity dispels favoritism and grants "everyday" developers fair access, democratizing community investment.

Recent updates, such as aligning CID application fees with other incentives at $5,000, underscore Topeka's dedication to efficiency. By committing to a single, steadfast policy, we promote transparency and inclusivity, avoiding capricious alterations based on influence.

Moreover, to truly propel growth amid today's economic headwinds, Topeka should waive development fees for qualifying CID projects. The city already permits the City Manager to reduce permitting costs by up to 25% for economic development initiatives under Municipal Code 109.6, recognizing their value in spurring progress. But given the burdens developers face, a full waiver—or at least an expansion beyond 25%—is warranted. Construction costs have surged, with national indices showing a 6.6% rise over the past year and projections for 4-5% inflation in non-residential building in 2025-2026. In the Midwest, including Kansas, material prices for steel, concrete, and lumber remain elevated due to supply chain volatility and tariffs, while labor wages outpace general economic growth. Overall inflation hit 2.7% in December 2025, with housing and energy costs climbing even faster, eroding developers' margins.

These pressures—compounded by Kansas-specific forecasts of 6% cost escalation in FY25 and 10% in FY26—make it tougher to launch community-boosting projects. Waiving fees like building permits, planning applications, or site plan reviews (which can total thousands per project) would alleviate this load, enabling developers to invest more in quality and innovation. This isn't a handout; it's a strategic pass to foster growth, keeping overall project costs manageable and accelerating Topeka's expansion. Precedents exist, such as fee waivers for charitable housing, proving the city's flexibility in supporting vital developments.

Looking forward, embracing CIDs with consistent policies and fee waivers positions Topeka as a developer-friendly hub. Reach out to your city council to endorse these measures and insist on equitable implementation. United, we can cultivate a dynamic city where growth be

Fw: Links to our properties

You might want to start looking for a real deal.

We just toured the market.

From: Moreno, Rob <rob.moreno@wyndham.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2026 12:53 PM
To: mcre13@gmail.com <mcre13@gmail.com>; wible.pd@gmail.com <wible.pd@gmail.com>
Subject: Links to our properties

click links below for more information on each brand

LaQuinta, Hawthorn, Dual Brand - New Construction and Conversion

ECHO Suites, Microtel, AmericInn, Wingate, & Baymont - New Construction

Rob Moreno

Director, Franchise Development

La Quinta, Hawthorn, ECHO Suites, Microtel

AmericInn & Wingate

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

M 720 490 9091

rob.moreno@wyndham.com

www.wyndhamdevelopment.com

This email message (including all attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Unless otherwise indicated in the body of this email, nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic signature and this transmission cannot be used to form, document, or authenticate a contract. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts and/or its affiliates may monitor all incoming and outgoing email communications in the United States, including the content of emails and attachments, for security, legal compliance, training, quality assurance and other purposes.

The information in this electronic mail ("e-mail") message may contain information that is confidential and/or privileged, or may otherwise be protected by work product or other legal rules. It is solely for the use of the individual(s) or the entity (ies) originally intended. Access to this electronic mail message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized review, disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this electronic message by mistake, and destroy all copies of the original message.

The sender believes that this e-mail and any attachments were free of any virus, worm, Trojan horse, malicious code and/or other contaminants when sent. E-mail transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free, so this message and its attachments could have been infected, corrupted or made incomplete during transmission. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for any viruses or other defects that may arise, and for taking remedial action relating to such viruses and other defects. Neither Wyndham Worldwide Corporation nor any of its affiliated entities is liable for any loss or damage arising in any way from, or for errors or omissions in the contents of, this message or its attachments.

mcre Media