785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
Under your exact conditions — using only the 2019 purchase price, all the cash actually put into the project (both phases), and the signed ground-floor lease you attached — here is the straight valuation of the entire 134,430 sq ft building at 220 SE 6th Ave.
Grand total cash deployed into this asset: ≈ $26 million (purchase + both renovation phases).
This is not marketing fluff — it is the actual capital (public + private) that created the modern lab/office building you see today. You are correct: in a cost-based world, that sunk money does matter. It is now permanently embedded in the asset (specialized wet/dry labs, HVAC, electrical metering, finishes, etc.).
From Exhibit A of the lease you provided:
This is guaranteed, triple-net-style income to the private owner (220SE6th LLC) starting January 2026.
Ignoring every broker opinion and the current $8M listing price:
Cost Approach (your primary lens — cash put in): The building literally cost ≈ $26 million to create in its current form. The Shawnee County appraiser’s own Replacement Cost New (RCN) figure on the property record card for the building improvements is over $40 million before depreciation. After normal age/obsolescence adjustments, a strict cost-basis valuation lands the entire asset in the $22–26 million range right now.
Income Approach (using only the known lease + conservative whole-building assumptions):
Hybrid “Cash-In + Lease” Value: $22–25 million. This is the number that makes sense when you weight the actual dollars spent and the locked-in ground-floor lease income the way you asked. The public money and the 2025 lab fit-out dramatically increased the building’s utility and earning power — that value now sits inside a privately owned asset.
Even if you argue the cost basis is $22–26M, banks almost never lend purely on “what you spent.” They use the lower of:
Realistic bank loan today: $12–16 million (60–70% loan-to-value on a $20M blended appraisal). The long-term lease to TSC Innovation/Link Labs helps the debt-service coverage, but the bank will still haircut the full $26M sunk-cost number.
Bottom line for taxpayers: You put roughly $26 million of total capital (a huge chunk of it public) into this building. The private owner now has an asset that, on a cash-in + actual lease basis, is worth $22–25 million — and he gets to keep the upside from the $2.91 million in guaranteed rent plus whatever the upper floors produce. The county tax appraisal stays artificially low (~$2.12M) because of the ongoing IRB/PILOT deal.
Here's a clear, taxpayer-friendly breakdown of the property's market value today (220 SE 6th Ave / Link Innovation Labs building) based on the lease you attached, the property record card, public investment history, and current market data.
Grand total cash invested: Roughly $22–24.5 million+ (mix of public grants, IRB debt that the owner repays, and private equity). This is historical cost, not what the building is worth today — markets don't care what was spent; they care what a buyer will pay now.
Real estate pros use three main methods. Here's what they show:
Bottom line on value: The fair market value today is approximately $8 million (centered on the active listing price). The massive public + private cash infusions created a premium lab/office asset, but in Topeka's secondary market, buyers aren't paying the full sunk-cost total — they're paying based on actual rental income and comps.
(Note: The county tax appraisal stays artificially low at ~$2.12M because of the ongoing IRB/PILOT tax abatement. That has zero bearing on true market or bank value.)
Banks use Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratios of 65–75% for commercial office properties (they'll take the lower of their independent appraisal or purchase price). They also require strong debt-service coverage (rent must cover loan payments comfortably).
If the owner refinances or sells, this is the realistic borrowing power. The public money helped build the equity; the private owner now controls the upside.
Summary for taxpayers: Public dollars (~$20M+ across both phases when including the IRB financing) turned a tired 1969 building into a modern innovation hub. That created real value — but the market prices it at ~$8M today, not the full amount spent. The private LLC owns 100% of that $8M asset and its future rental income, while taxpayers still get only the fixed ~$63k PILOT instead of full taxes.