Fwd: public comment

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Megan J. Brunson <mjbrunson@topeka.org>
Date: Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 3:57 PM
Subject: RE: public comment
To: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>, City Clerk <cclerk@topeka.org>, Robert M. Perez <rmperez@topeka.org>, MCRE Media <mcre1.9999@blogger.com>, Karen A. Hiller <khiller@topeka.org>

Hi Henry,

 

This email confirms you are signed up to speak under Item 5A.  Approval - Special Alcohol and Drug Funding Recommendations and Item 6. General Public Comment at the October 21, 2025 Governing Body meeting. The meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at 214 SE 8^th Street, 2nd Floor, Topeka KS.  

 

You will have 4 minutes to address the Governing Body for each item.

 

Per Governing Body Rule 5.5, public comments are limited to topics directly relevant to the business of the Governing Body.  Comments pertaining to personnel and litigation matters are not allowed.

 

Procedures for Addressing the Governing Body

In accordance with Governing Body Rules 5.6 and 5.7, the following protocols for public comment apply:

 

• Each person shall state his or her name and city of residence in an audible tone for the record.
• All remarks shall be addressed to the Governing Body as a whole -- not to any individual member.
• In order to provide additional time for as many individuals as possible to address the Governing Body, each individual signed up to speak will need to complete his or her comments within four minutes.

 

Per Governing Body Rule 5.7, the following behavior will not be tolerated from any speaker:

 

• Uttering fighting words
• Slander
• Speeches invasive of the privacy of individuals (no mention of names) Unreasonably Loud Speech
• Repetitious Speech or Debate
• Speeches so disruptive of proceedings that the legislative process is substantially interrupted

 

Any speaker who engages in this type of behavior will be warned once by the presiding office (Mayor).  If the behavior continues, the speaker will be ordered to cease his or her behavior.  If the speaker persists in interfering with the ability of the Governing Body to carry out its function, he or she will be removed from the City Council Chambers or Zoom meeting room.

 

Thank you!

 

Megan Brunson

Administrative Officer, Special Events

mjbrunson@topeka.org

785-368-3940

 

"The preceding email message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges or that may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not listed as a recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful."

 

 

From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2025 3:36 PM
To: City Clerk <cclerk@topeka.org>; Robert M. Perez <rmperez@topeka.org>; MCRE Media <mcre1.9999@blogger.com>; Karen A. Hiller <khiller@topeka.org>
Subject: public comment

 

Notice: -----This message was sent by an external sender-----

 

sign me up 

 

Action item 5 a

 

Approval - 2026 Special Alcohol and Drug Funding Recommendations APPROVAL of the 2026 Special Alcohol and Drug funding recommendations and allocations in the amount of $720,206.

6 - end of meeting public comment 

 

--

Henry McClure 

Time kills deals

785-383-9994

 

www.henrymcclure.live

--

Henry McClure 

Time kills deals

785-383-9994

www.henrymcclure.live

RE: public comment

Hi Henry,

 

This email confirms you are signed up to speak under Item 5A.  Approval - Special Alcohol and Drug Funding Recommendations and Item 6. General Public Comment at the October 21, 2025 Governing Body meeting. The meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers located at 214 SE 8^th Street, 2nd Floor, Topeka KS.  

 

You will have 4 minutes to address the Governing Body for each item.

 

Per Governing Body Rule 5.5, public comments are limited to topics directly relevant to the business of the Governing Body.  Comments pertaining to personnel and litigation matters are not allowed.

 

Procedures for Addressing the Governing Body

In accordance with Governing Body Rules 5.6 and 5.7, the following protocols for public comment apply:

 

• Each person shall state his or her name and city of residence in an audible tone for the record.
• All remarks shall be addressed to the Governing Body as a whole -- not to any individual member.
• In order to provide additional time for as many individuals as possible to address the Governing Body, each individual signed up to speak will need to complete his or her comments within four minutes.

 

Per Governing Body Rule 5.7, the following behavior will not be tolerated from any speaker:

 

• Uttering fighting words
• Slander
• Speeches invasive of the privacy of individuals (no mention of names) Unreasonably Loud Speech
• Repetitious Speech or Debate
• Speeches so disruptive of proceedings that the legislative process is substantially interrupted

 

Any speaker who engages in this type of behavior will be warned once by the presiding office (Mayor).  If the behavior continues, the speaker will be ordered to cease his or her behavior.  If the speaker persists in interfering with the ability of the Governing Body to carry out its function, he or she will be removed from the City Council Chambers or Zoom meeting room.

 

Thank you!

 

Megan Brunson

Administrative Officer, Special Events

mjbrunson@topeka.org

785-368-3940

 

“The preceding email message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges or that may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not listed as a recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.”

 

 

From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2025 3:36 PM
To: City Clerk <cclerk@topeka.org>; Robert M. Perez <rmperez@topeka.org>; MCRE Media <mcre1.9999@blogger.com>; Karen A. Hiller <khiller@topeka.org>
Subject: public comment

 

Notice: -----This message was sent by an external sender-----

 

sign me up 

 

Action item 5 a

 

Approval - 2026 Special Alcohol and Drug Funding Recommendations APPROVAL of the 2026 Special Alcohol and Drug funding recommendations and allocations in the amount of $720,206.

6 - end of meeting public comment 

 

--

Henry McClure 

Time kills deals

785-383-9994

 

www.henrymcclure.live

AG opinion

When a public official, such as a county commissioner, fails to implement a state law, the remedies are typically political or administrative, not a personal lawsuit from a citizen. The official's status as a lawyer and "officer of the court" is unlikely to change this, as their obligations in that capacity primarily relate to their practice of law, not to their political duties. 

Why suing is difficult

• Official duties vs. personal capacity: When serving as a commissioner, the lawyer is acting in their official capacity as an elected official, not as a private attorney. Their conduct is therefore governed by public office laws, not the rules of professional conduct that apply to them as an attorney.
• Discretion vs. ministerial duty: In some cases, a law is not a simple, mandatory instruction but rather one that gives an official discretion in how to implement it. Suing for failure to perform a discretionary duty is extremely difficult because courts generally will not second-guess a public official's policy-based decision.
• Political vs. legal issue: An official's refusal to implement a state law is usually viewed as a political dispute to be resolved by political means, such as voting them out of office, not a legal one for the courts to decide.
• The requirement of harm: As discussed previously, you must show you suffered a unique, specific harm to have "standing" to sue. The refusal to implement a program that affects the general public is not considered sufficient for a personal lawsuit. 

"Officer of the court" obligations

While a lawyer is considered an "officer of the court," this duty typically obligates them to uphold the law in their professional capacity—for example, not presenting false evidence or lying to a judge. This obligation does not extend to forcing a public official to act in their legislative or executive role. Disciplinary action for a lawyer's misconduct is handled by the state bar association, and an official's inaction in office is not a matter for the bar. 

Alternatives to suing

• Involuntary removal from office: Some state laws, including in Kansas, provide a mechanism for removing officials for "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or misconduct in office". This process is typically initiated by another government body, such as a higher-ranking executive official or the courts, following a formal hearing.
• Citizen recall election: In some jurisdictions, citizens can initiate a recall election to remove a public official from office before their term is over. The requirements for this process are defined by state and local laws.
• Refer the issue to the Attorney General: The state Attorney General is the chief legal officer and is responsible for enforcing state law. If a local official is refusing to implement a state mandate, the AG has the authority to investigate and take action. Kansas has seen recent examples of this, as when the Attorney General filed a lawsuit against the Governor to compel the turning over of data.
• Organize political opposition: As a concerned citizen, you can rally support within the community to influence the official through protests, public pressure, and supporting an opponent in the next election.
• Pursue a lawsuit under civil rights law (very limited): If the official's failure to act can be framed as a systemic failure that deprives citizens of specific, protected constitutional rights, a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 may be possible. However, this is a very high legal bar to clear and requires proving an abuse of power, not just a policy disagreement. 

--

Henry McClure 

Time kills deals

785-383-9994

www.henrymcclure.live

public comment

sign me up 

Action item 5 a

Approval - 2026 Special Alcohol and Drug Funding Recommendations APPROVAL of the 2026 Special Alcohol and Drug funding recommendations and allocations in the amount of $720,206.

6 - end of meeting public comment 

--

Henry McClure 

Time kills deals

785-383-9994

www.henrymcclure.live

FYI

Dr. Gundry views millet positively as a gluten-free and lectin-free grain that is a good alternative to other grains like rice. He points to its benefits, such as being high in fiber, protein, and micronutrients, and notes its potential for improving blood sugar control, lowering insulin resistance, and supporting gut health. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]  

Positive aspects highlighted by Dr. Gundry: 

• Lectin-free: Dr. Gundry identifies millet as a lectin-free grain, which is a key component of his dietary recommendations. [1, 2]  

• Gut health: He notes that millet is high in fiber, which is beneficial for gut health. [1]  

• Blood sugar management: Research cited in sources aligned with Gundry's views indicates that millet consumption can lead to a lower increase in blood sugar compared to rice and can reduce insulin resistance, which may help move individuals with pre-diabetes to a non-pre-diabetic state. [3]  

• Nutrient-dense: Millet is a good source of protein, iron, magnesium, and phosphorus. [1]  

How millet fits into his broader dietary philosophy: 

• Alternative to high-lectin grains: For those avoiding lectins, millet is a suitable alternative to grains like wheat, which are staples in many diets. [2, 6, 7]  

• Healthy substitute for oatmeal: It is suggested as a good lectin-free substitute for oatmeal, which can be high in lectins depending on the preparation. [1, 8, 9]  

• Part of a healthy diet: Overall, it is considered a beneficial and nutrient-dense addition to a diet that prioritizes avoiding lectins and improving metabolic health. [1, 3, 10]  

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://creativeinmykitchen.com/how-to-make-millet-porridge/

[2] https://www.pinterest.com/pin/the-4-guthealthy-glutenfree-and-lectinfree-grains--454371049925281424/

[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6xfwjOY_wM

[4] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11091339/

[5] https://sevensons.net/blog/what-are-lectin-free-eggs

[6] https://www.everydayhealth.com/diet-nutrition/lectin-free-diet/

[7] https://zegofoods.com/what-is-millet-and-why-arent-we-eating-more-of-it/

[8] https://irc.lush.co.uk/13665992/understanding-dr-gundry-039-s-perspective-on-oatmeal/

[9] https://www.grapetree.co.uk/blog/millet-benefits-uses-and-best-organic-millet

[10] https://www.smartfood.org/project/study-shows-millets-can-reduce-risk-of-developing-cardiovascular-diseases/

Not all images can be exported from Search.

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

Watch "Eat These 7 Foods Daily | Your Body Will Cure Its Own Diseases Without Medicines | Buddhist Wisdom" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/iZS05Ds-wqk?si=VtFahs4GB3jOW0_Y

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals