Thursday, December 18, 2025

Ice 🧊 is not a race thing.

Yes, white people who are not U.S. citizens and are in violation of immigration law can be, and are, detained and deported by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). [1]  
ICE does not track deportations based on race or ethnicity, but rather by the country the individual is being removed to. Countries in Europe, such as Ireland, Russia, and Norway, have received deported individuals, who are likely white. News reports have noted cases of white immigrants being detained and deported, including a Polish person and an Irishman. [1, 2, 3]  
Key points regarding deportations: 

• Citizenship Status is the Key Factor: U.S. citizens (whether by birth or naturalization) generally cannot be legally deported. The government can only pursue denaturalization in specific, rare circumstances involving fraud or national security concerns, which requires a formal court process. 
• Wrongful Detentions Occur: ICE has sometimes detained and even wrongfully deported U.S. citizens due to errors such as misidentification or outdated records, regardless of race. 
• Focus on Non-Citizens: ICE's mission is to identify, arrest, and remove non-citizens who are in the U.S. illegally or who have committed crimes. 
• Race vs. Ethnicity: Hispanic or Latino individuals, who are often the top demographic in deportation statistics because they typically come from top-deportation destination countries like Mexico and Guatemala, can be of any race, including white. [1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]  

While statistics often focus on top deportation destination countries, individuals from various countries across the world, including those with predominantly white populations, are subject to U.S. immigration law and potential deportation if they are in the country without proper legal status. [1]  

AI responses may include mistakes.




Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
on No comments:

Gundry

Dr. Gundry distinguishes between two types of starches: those to avoid and those that are beneficial for health, specifically resistant starches. [1, 2, 3, 4]  
Starches to Avoid 
Dr. Gundry generally recommends avoiding refined, easily digestible starches found in the standard Western diet. These foods are often high in lectins (proteins that he argues can damage the gut lining) and can cause rapid spikes in blood sugar and insulin levels. [5, 6, 7]  
Foods on his "No" list include: 

• Potatoes (white/yellow) 
• Rice 
• Breads, pastas, cereals, and other flours made from grains 
• Oatmeal 
• Corn and corn products (like tortillas) [3, 6, 8, 9, 10]  

Beneficial Starches (Resistant Starches) [11]  
In contrast, Dr. Gundry highly recommends resistant starches, which are starches that the human body doesn't digest well but serve as a crucial food source for beneficial gut bacteria. These resistant starches promote a healthy microbiome, may aid insulin sensitivity, and contribute to overall gut health. [1, 11]  
Approved resistant starches include: 

• Tubers like sweet potatoes, yuca, taro root, jicama, parsnips, rutabaga, and turnips 
• Green plantains and green bananas 
• Millet and sorghum 
• Cassava and coconut flours [1, 2]  

Preparation Tip: You can increase the resistant starch content of approved starchy foods, such as sweet potatoes, by cooking them and then cooling them in the refrigerator before reheating. [13]  

AI responses may include mistakes.




Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
on No comments:

Starch

Starch, especially resistant starch, offers benefits like improved gut health (acting as a prebiotic for good bacteria), better blood sugar control (slowing glucose absorption), increased fullness for weight management, and potential heart health benefits by lowering cholesterol. As a primary energy source, it fuels the brain and body, and whole-grain starches provide essential fiber, vitamins, and minerals, supporting overall digestion and reducing chronic disease risk. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]  
Key Health Benefits 

• Gut Health & Prebiotic Effects: Resistant starch feeds beneficial gut bacteria, producing short-chain fatty acids (like butyrate) that nourish colon cells, reduce inflammation, and support immunity. 
• Blood Sugar & Insulin Sensitivity: It slows sugar absorption, leading to more stable blood glucose and insulin levels, and can even improve sensitivity over time, beneficial for preventing type 2 diabetes. 
• Weight Management: By promoting satiety (feeling full) and reducing appetite, resistant starch can help lower overall calorie intake. 
• Heart Health: Consumption is linked to lower "bad" (LDL) cholesterol and a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease. 
• Energy & Nutrients: Starchy foods provide essential energy (glucose), B vitamins, iron, and fiber, especially whole-grain varieties, notes the NHS (https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/eat-well/food-types/starchy-foods-and-carbohydrates/) and Medical News Today. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]  

Types of Resistant Starch 

• Type 1: In grains, seeds, legumes (bound by cell walls). 
• Type 2: Raw potatoes, green bananas (found in uncooked foods). 
• Type 3: Cooked and cooled starches like potatoes, rice, pasta. [2]  

To get these benefits, focus on whole grains, legumes, and potatoes with their skins on, and consider incorporating cooled cooked starches. [2, 6, 10]  
To make these benefits more concrete, would you like examples of specific foods high in each type of resistant starch? 

AI responses may include mistakes.




Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
on No comments:

Star anise

Star anise offers health benefits like antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory effects, helping with digestion (bloating, gas), respiratory issues (coughs, congestion), and boosting immunity, thanks to compounds like anethole and shikimic acid, but it must be used cautiously as it can be toxic if contaminated or consumed in large amounts. [1, 2, 3, 4]  
Key Benefits: 

• Antioxidant & Anti-inflammatory: Rich in antioxidants like linalool and quercetin, it fights free radicals, reducing oxidative stress linked to chronic diseases, and soothes inflammation. 
• Digestive Aid: Traditional use for relieving gas, bloating, indigestion, and cramps by relaxing gastrointestinal muscles. 
• Antimicrobial: Shows promise against various bacteria (like E. coli) and fungi, potentially helping fight infections, notes a 2010 lab study (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7797340/) and this Healthline article. 
• Respiratory Support: Acts as an expectorant to clear mucus and soothe coughs; shikimic acid is a component in some flu medications, say the fullleafteacompany.com page (https://fullleafteacompany.com/pages/what-is-star-anise-tea-history-benefits-more) and the Dr. Axe article. 
• Immune Booster: Vitamin C and other compounds help support immune health, according to this Full Leaf Tea Company page and the Times of India article. 
• Cardiovascular Health: Antioxidants and coumarin may help reduce blood clots and blood pressure. [1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]  

Important Warning: 

• Toxicity Risk: Star anise from the Illicium verum tree (Chinese star anise) is safe in small culinary amounts, but it's often confused with the toxic Japanese star anise (Illicium anisatum), which can cause seizures and intoxication, notes Verywell Health (https://www.verywellhealth.com/star-anise-benefits-8597823) and Health.com (https://www.health.com/star-anise-benefits-8425939). [2, 4]  

To get the most personalized benefits and ensure safety, it's best to consult with a healthcare provider before using star anise as a medicinal supplement, especially if you have existing conditions or are pregnant. [6, 14, 15, 16]  

AI responses may include mistakes.




Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
on No comments:

Dirty deals?

MTAA
Historical Background and Initial Lease ArrangementsIn the summer of 1986, the Rural Development Corporation ("RDC") entered into a ground lease agreement with the Metropolitan Topeka Airport Authority ("MTAA") for three buildings located on MTAA-owned property. At the time, these structures were slated for potential demolition due to their condition. The leases were executed at the prevailing standard ground lease rate, as the cost of demolition would have imposed a significant financial burden on the MTAA, a public entity funded in part by taxpayer resources.In consideration for the favorable lease terms, RDC undertook the obligation to perform substantial remodeling and improvements to the buildings. RDC duly fulfilled these commitments, thereafter subleasing the renovated properties to third-party tenants. Over the ensuing period exceeding 39 years, these arrangements have facilitated ongoing economic activity, including the creation and sustenance of employment opportunities within the Topeka community.Subsequent Lease of Building 281 and Ensuing DisputeApproximately in 2015–2016, RDC identified an opportunity to lease Building 281—a facility comprising approximately 30,000 square feet—to a national tenant. The proposed tenancy contemplated the employment of between 300 and 400 office personnel at the Forbes Field location, thereby promising substantial economic benefits to the region. However, realization of this project necessitated a comprehensive renovation of the existing structure, coupled with the construction of an additional 15,000 square foot expansion.Given that RDC held only a leasehold interest (rather than fee simple ownership) in the underlying real property, securing long-term financing from lending institutions required assurance of tenure stability. Accordingly, the parties negotiated and executed a lease agreement providing for an initial term of ten (10) years, together with six (6) successive ten-year renewal options, exercisable at RDC's discretion.Several years subsequent to execution, RDC ascertained discrepancies between the parties' respective copies of the lease document. Specifically, it was alleged that the MTAA's version had been materially altered, including modifications to the notarized signatures. These allegations of unauthorized alteration and potential fraud were substantiated through forensic examination by multiple qualified expert witnesses retained by both parties, resulting in expert fees and related costs aggregating tens of thousands of dollars.The matter proceeded to litigation, wherein claims were asserted including, inter alia, breach of contract, fraud, and related causes of action.Mediation and Settlement EffortsTo resolve the protracted dispute amicably and avoid further expenditure of resources, the parties engaged in mediation. This process culminated in the execution of a Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement (alternatively referred to as a remediation agreement) on or about July 17, 2025. Pursuant to the terms thereof, the MTAA assumed the obligation to tender a final payment to RDC by no later than December 31, 2025, in exchange for a full release of claims and termination of RDC's leasehold interest.Notwithstanding the binding nature of this agreement, the MTAA has failed or refused to perform its payment obligations thereunder. As a consequence, the litigation has persisted, with the presiding court issuing an order directing the MTAA to remit the agreed settlement sum, together with accrued interest on the principal amount and reimbursement of RDC's reasonable attorneys' fees and litigation expenses.Impact on Public ResourcesThis ongoing controversy has resulted in substantial financial detriment to the public fisc. Taxpayer funds have been expended not only on the MTAA's defense costs and attorneys' fees but also on the underlying settlement obligation, statutory or contractual interest accruing thereon, and the court-mandated reimbursement of RDC's legal fees. Such duplicative and avoidable expenditures underscore the broader implications for fiscal responsibility in the management of public authorities.The foregoing facts are derived from documented transactions, expert analyses, court proceedings, and the executed agreements, many aspects of which are matters of public record or otherwise verifiable through appropriate channels.Note: Recent public sources (as of December 18, 2025) indicate that the settlement involves a total payment of $1.8 million by MTAA to acquire RDC's leasehold interest in Building 281, structured in installments, with the agreement dated July 17, 2025. Certain details, such as the specific allegations of document alteration or the current status of court-ordered enforcement, appear limited to a single critical blog post and are not corroborated in mainstream news outlets or official MTAA records. For any formal report, public dissemination, or legal filing, it is strongly recommended to consult primary documents (e.g., court filings in Shawnee County District Court), verify all assertions with counsel, and ensure compliance with applicable rules governing statements of fact.


--
Henry McClure 
Time kills deals
785-383-9994

www.henrymcclure.live
on No comments:
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)