Sunday, January 18, 2026

Doc

Doc Holliday's Last Words Were Not What Anyone Expected

For a man whose name became synonymous with gunfire, gambling tables, and frontier violence, John Henry "Doc" Holliday met death in a way that defied his entire reputation.

No shootout.
No final duel.
No boots, no gun, no dust-filled street.

Instead, on November 8, 1887, Doc Holliday died quietly in a rented room at the Hotel Glenwood, weakened by disease, watched over by people who barely knew who he was. He was just 36 years old.

And his final, clearly spoken words were not brave, threatening, or poetic.

They were ironic.
Almost amused.

"I always thought I'd die with my boots on."

The Man Who Was Never Supposed to Die in Bed

By the time of his death, Doc Holliday was already a legend of the American West. Born into a respectable Southern family in Georgia, Holliday trained as a dentist and earned his degree at a time when dentistry was a legitimate and rising profession.

But destiny intervened early.

In his early twenties, Holliday was diagnosed with tuberculosis, the same disease that had killed his mother. In the 19th century, tuberculosis was not just dangerous. It was a slow sentence. Doctors advised him to move west, believing dry air might prolong his life.

It did not cure him.
It gave him time.

And with that time, Holliday reinvented himself.

From Dentist to Gunfighter

The West offered freedom, but it also offered temptation. Holliday drifted into gambling, saloons, and violence. His sharp intellect and steady hands made him a feared card player, and when trouble followed, he proved just as deadly with a gun or knife.

He became closely allied with Wyatt Earp, standing beside him during the infamous O.K. Corral gunfight in 1881. That thirty-second shootout cemented Holliday's reputation forever.

Stories followed him across territories.
Some exaggerated. Some accurate.
All dangerous.

He survived ambushes, barroom brawls, arrests, and enemies who fully intended to kill him. His tuberculosis worsened every year, yet he continued moving, fighting, drinking, and gambling.

He outlived men who were stronger, younger, and healthier.

But he could not outrun disease.

The Slow Collapse

By the mid-1880s, tuberculosis had taken full control of Holliday's body. He coughed blood regularly. His breathing was labored. His once lean but capable frame deteriorated into something skeletal.

When he arrived in Glenwood Springs, he was already dying. The sulfur springs were believed to have medicinal value, but by then, no environment could save him.

Witnesses described a man over six feet tall weighing barely 120 pounds. His skin stretched tightly over bone. His hands, once famously steady, shook uncontrollably.

Yet mentally, Holliday remained sharp.

He understood exactly what was happening.

The Final Morning

On the morning of November 8, 1887, nothing dramatic occurred. A nurse checked on him. A doctor visited, fully aware there was nothing left to be done. Holliday drifted in and out of consciousness, muttering fragments of memory. Card games. Old fights. Names of people long gone.

Then, unexpectedly, he woke with clarity.

He looked down toward the foot of the bed.

His boots were gone.

Only socks covered his feet.

And that was when he laughed.

Not loudly. Not comfortably. A wheezing laugh that turned into coughing, but unmistakably real. According to those present, there was genuine amusement in his expression.

"Well, I'll be damned," he said.

When the nurse looked confused, he explained.

"I always thought I'd die with my boots on."

Within hours, he slipped back into unconsciousness. By late afternoon, Doc Holliday was dead.

Why Those Words Matter

For decades, the phrase "die with your boots on" had defined men like Doc Holliday. It meant dying violently, on your feet, weapon in hand. It was the expected ending for a man who lived by confrontation.

Holliday knew that.
And he knew it would not be his fate.

After years of dodging bullets and blades, tuberculosis claimed him quietly. No enemy stood across from him. No final stand was made. Just a bed, a nurse, and a truth he could no longer escape.

His final words were not denial.
They were acceptance mixed with irony.

He understood the contradiction of his life. That despite becoming one of the most feared men in the West, he would die the same way he might have if he had stayed a dentist in Georgia.

Slowly.
Painfully.
Inevitably.

The Death of a Legend, Not the Myth

No photograph captured Holliday's final hours. No friends gathered for a dramatic farewell. Most people in that hotel had no idea they were watching the end of a legend.

And that is precisely why the moment matters.

Doc Holliday did not romanticize his death. He did not pretend it fit the myth. He acknowledged the absurdity of it, even laughed at it.

That laugh was defiance.

Not against death itself, but against the idea that death had finally beaten him on its own terms.

What His Last Words Reveal

History remembers Doc Holliday as a gunfighter, gambler, and outlaw ally. But his final words show something deeper.

He was self-aware.
He was honest.
He was unafraid to recognize the irony of his own story.

In that moment, stripped of weapons, reputation, and myth, he was still himself. A man who understood that life does not grant us the ending we imagine.

We do not choose how we die.
We only choose how we face it.

Doc Holliday faced it with clarity, dark humor, and dignity.

And somehow, by laughing at the absurdity of his own legend, he turned even a quiet death in a rented room into something unforgettable.

That is why his last words still echo.

"I always thought I'd die with my boots on."
I put a lot of effort into researching and sharing stories that matter. If you'd like to support the work, here's the link:
Every coffee helps me keep creating.



Yeah, that's a solid retelling of one of the most poignant and ironic moments in Old West history. Doc Holliday's death really does stand out for how **un-dramatic** it was compared to the myth that built up around him.

The core of the story checks out historically: He died on November 8, 1887, in Glenwood Springs, Colorado, at age 36 from tuberculosis (consumption), after spending his final weeks in the Hotel Glenwood trying the sulfur springs for relief. No big shootout, no dramatic farewell—just a quiet end in bed.

His actual last words, according to multiple historical accounts (including nurse recollections and early biographies), were **"This is funny."** He reportedly looked down at his bare feet (or bootless feet), realized the irony after a life of violence where he expected to "die with his boots on" (i.e., in a gunfight or on his feet in action), and found it amusing in that dark, wry way of his.

The expanded version you shared—"I always thought I'd die with my boots on"—is a common paraphrase or elaboration that captures the spirit perfectly. It appears in popular retellings, articles, and even ties into how the phrase is explained in sources discussing his death. The movie *Tombstone* (1993) went with the concise "This is funny" for authenticity (Val Kilmer's delivery sells the irony without spelling it out), but many books and stories fill in the "boots on" context because that's exactly what he was referencing—the old cowboy/outlaw expectation of dying violently rather than wasting away in bed.

It's a great example of how legend and reality collide: The man who stood with Wyatt Earp at the O.K. Corral, who survived countless scraps, ended up taken out by the same slow disease that drove him West in the first place. That self-aware chuckle (or wheeze) at the absurdity feels very "Doc"—sharp, unflinching, and a little defiant even at the end.

Your write-up nails the emotional weight of it. The irony isn't just funny; it's kind of profound. He faced death on its terms, not his, and still managed one last clever line.

If you're into more on this, accounts from places like True West Magazine or the Glenwood Springs Historical Society add nice details about his last days (like the whiskey request and the people around him). Solid research on your part—stories like this deserve to be told.

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

Now you know

The **best deal** by far is **option 3: $2 million per hour**.

Here's the breakdown (using ~365.25 days/year for realism, including leap years):

- **Option 1**: $10 trillion today = **$10,000,000,000,000** (a one-time lump sum).
- **Option 2**: $20 million/day  
  → ~$7.305 billion per year  
  → Takes ~1,369 years to reach $10 trillion.
- **Option 3**: $2 million/hour  
  → ~$17.532 billion per year (that's over **$48 million per day**)  
  → Takes ~570 years to reach $10 trillion.  
  → This is roughly **2.4× more per year** than option 2.
- **Option 4**: $5 billion/year  
  → Takes 2,000 years to reach $10 trillion.  
  → Weakest ongoing rate here.

**Option 3 crushes the others** for long-term wealth. You would earn **more in one year** (~$17.5B) than option 4 does in **3.5 years**, and **way more** than option 2 (~$7.3B/year). In just ~10 years you'd have ~$175 billion—already far beyond what most people could ever spend—while the money keeps pouring in forever at an insane clip.

Option 1's $10 trillion sounds unbeatable at first (it's an enormous fortune today), but the perpetual streams in options 2–4 keep generating wealth indefinitely. Among those, option 3 is the clear winner because of its much higher rate.

If the question assumes you're thinking practically (like "how much could I actually enjoy/spend in a normal human lifetime?"), option 3 still wins easily—you'd be making tens of millions **daily** without ever running out.

**So: Choose #3.** $2 million per hour is the mathematically dominant choice.



Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

Sit this one out

The best way to meditate depends on your goal and comfort, but sitting up with a straight spine is generally recommended for awareness, while lying down (Savasana) is great for deep relaxation but risks sleep; use cushions for support in seated poses like Sukhasana (easy cross-legged) to keep knees lower than hips, ensuring comfort without strain, as stability and alertness are key, notes. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]  
Sitting Up (Recommended for Alertness) 

• Why: Promotes alertness, proper breathing, and a stable base for focus. 
• How: 

 • Use Support: Sit on a cushion or folded blanket to elevate your hips above your knees. 
 • Easy Pose (Sukhasana): Simple cross-legged, but use support so your knees are lower than your hips. 
 • Chair: Feet flat on the floor, spine straight, pelvis tilted slightly forward. 
 • Upright Spine: Imagine a string pulling the crown of your head up, shoulders relaxed and back. [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7]  

Lying Down (For Relaxation, but Be Aware) 

• Why: Excellent for deep relaxation and restorative practices (Savasana/Corpse Pose). 
• How: 

 • Corpse Pose (Savasana): Lie on your back, arms at your sides, palms up, body still. 
 • Watch for Sleep: This position can induce sleep, so it's best for shorter sessions or if sitting causes pain. 
 • Tip: Some suggest holding a hand on your chest; if it falls, you're falling asleep. [3, 8, 9]  

Key Principle: Comfort & Stability 

• Avoid Pain: Discomfort (from hard surfaces or cramped limbs) becomes a distraction. 
• Stability: A stable, comfortable posture allows the mind to settle. 
• Experiment: Try different supports (cushions, blankets) and positions to find what keeps you awake and relaxed. [2, 3, 4, 8, 10, 11]  

AI responses may include mistakes.




Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

Richard

The statement refers to **Laura Kelly**, the Governor of Kansas (a Democrat who has served since 2019, and previously a state senator). Public biographical records confirm her educational background matches what you described exactly.

- She holds a **Bachelor of Science (B.S.) in Psychology** from Bradley University.
- She earned a **Master of Science (M.S.) in Therapeutic Recreation** from Indiana University.

These degrees are in the fields of psychology and recreational therapy (also called therapeutic recreation), which focuses on using leisure activities, recreation, and structured programs to improve physical, cognitive, emotional, and social well-being—often for people with illnesses, disabilities, injuries, or in rehabilitation settings (e.g., hospitals, mental health facilities, senior care, or veteran programs).

Therapeutic recreation is a recognized allied health profession. Practitioners (often called Certified Therapeutic Recreation Specialists or CTRS after certification) design and implement activity-based interventions to support treatment goals, drawing on psychology principles, anatomy, program planning, and client assessment. It's distinct from clinical psychology or counseling but overlaps in mental health applications.

Laura Kelly does **not** have a law degree (J.D.) or any formal legal education. Her pre-political career included working as a recreation therapist, director of recreation therapy and physical education, and executive director of the Kansas Recreation and Park Association—roles aligned with her degrees in psychology and therapeutic recreation.

Your point about her lacking legal credentials appears accurate based on available records; she has no reported law school attendance or bar admission. The suggestion to "go back to her corner" is colorful political rhetoric, but her background is solidly in behavioral health, recreation, and public service rather than law. If this is about a specific debate or claim (e.g., on legal matters), her expertise lies elsewhere.

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

In the end, economic development isn't about charity—it's about smart, sustainable investments that pave the way for a thriving future.


Misallocation of Economic Development Funds: Sales Tax Dollars Diverted from Infrastructure to Charities in Topeka
In Shawnee County, Kansas, a half-cent sales tax was implemented to fuel economic growth, generating millions annually for initiatives like site acquisition, infrastructure improvements, equipment purchases, and workforce training. This tax, approved by voters, is explicitly designated for economic development activities through GO Topeka, the economic arm of the Greater Topeka Partnership. Yet, a closer look at how these funds are being spent reveals a troubling pattern: significant portions are funneled into grants, sponsorships, and contributions that resemble charitable donations rather than strategic investments in the local economy. This raises a critical question—should taxpayer dollars earmarked for building a stronger economic foundation be used to support community events, churches, and non-profits, or should they be strictly allocated to tangible infrastructure projects that create jobs and drive long-term growth?The Funding Mechanism: A Sales Tax for Growth, Not GiveawaysGO Topeka's budget is primarily supported by this countywide half-cent sales tax, which brings in over $10 million yearly for economic incentives. The intent is clear: to attract businesses, expand operations, and enhance infrastructure to make Topeka more competitive. Examples of appropriate uses include cash incentives for machinery, building improvements, utility extensions, and land development for target industries or headquarters. Infrastructure assistance is explicitly mentioned as a key component, allowing for road improvements, utility lines, and other essential upgrades that support business expansion. However, this sales tax is distinct from Topeka's separate half-cent sales tax dedicated solely to street maintenance and infrastructure repairs, which funds projects like sidewalks and road fixes. While the economic development tax can include infrastructure elements tied to growth, it was never meant to become a slush fund for feel-good community initiatives. Blurring these lines risks diluting the impact of both taxes, as funds that could bolster critical infrastructure are instead scattered across non-essential programs.Examining the Expenditures: Charities Masquerading as Economic DevelopmentA 2024 inquiry into GO Topeka's grants and contributions for 2022 and 2023, as detailed in a public email from President Molly Howey, exposes how these funds are being allocated. Under the budget line for "grants/contributions/sponsorships/scholarships," millions were disbursed, but many recipients bear little resemblance to economic engines. Instead, they appear as charitable handouts, supporting events, churches, and social programs that, while worthwhile, do not directly contribute to job creation, business attraction, or infrastructure.Key Examples from 2022:
  • Community Events and Churches: $300 to New Mount Zion Baptist Church for a community dinner; $2,000 to Topeka Family and Friends Juneteenth Celebration; $1,500 to Shampayne Lloyd Ministries for a retreat; $2,000 to Oakland Garden A Community of Growers. These resemble philanthropy, not investments in economic infrastructure.
  • Non-Profits and Social Initiatives: $3,000 to Topeka Center for Peace and Justice; $5,000 to YWCA Northeast Kansas; $2,500 to Bring Back the Blvd.; $3,000 to Junior Achievement of Kansas. While these organizations do valuable work, funding them with economic development sales tax diverts resources from roads, utilities, or business incentives.
  • Larger Programs: Even bigger line items like $174,000 for Choose Topeka (talent recruitment) and $134,774 for PTAC (procurement assistance) are defensible as economic tools, but they are outnumbered by smaller, scattershot grants that total hundreds of thousands.
Key Examples from 2023:
  • Similar Patterns: $2,500 to New Mount Zion Baptist Church for a back-to-school event; $2,500 to NAACP Topeka Branch for a banquet; $2,500 to Revelations Evangelistic Ministry for a teen employment program; $10,000 to Community Resource Council for an event sponsorship.
  • Pitch Contests and Sponsorships: Winners like Chef LaMona LLC ($15,000) or Paletas Royale ($8,000) from minority-owned business pitch contests show some entrepreneurial focus, but overall, the list includes $2,500 to Black Entrepreneurs of the Flint Hills and $5,000 to Mana De Topeka—again, more aligned with social equity than hardcore economic development.
  • Educational and Other: $25,000 to Washburn University Foundation for a pitch competition; $50,000 to Forge (likely a co-working or startup space). These have economic ties, but when mixed with church dinners and festivals, the focus blurs.
In total, these expenditures highlight a shift from targeted economic strategies to broad community support. While GO Topeka frames them as part of larger programs like pitch competitions and regional investments, critics argue they waste money on items that don't yield measurable economic returns. Why These Aren't True Economic DevelopmentEconomic development funds should prioritize initiatives with a clear return on investment: job creation, capital attraction, and infrastructure that enables business growth. Infrastructure, in particular, is a cornerstone—extending utilities, improving roads, or acquiring sites for new facilities directly supports expansion. Sponsoring a church event or a Juneteenth celebration, however noble, does not build bridges, upgrade sewers, or lure manufacturers. These are charitable acts, better suited for private donations or separate community funds, not taxpayer sales tax.This misallocation has real consequences. Topeka faces ongoing infrastructure needs, from street repairs funded by a dedicated tax to broader challenges like aging utilities. Diverting economic development dollars to charities means less for performance-based incentives that could attract high-wage jobs or fund critical projects. Moreover, it erodes public trust in how sales taxes are used, potentially jeopardizing future voter approvals for such levies.A Call for Reform: Redirect Funds to Infrastructure and Real GrowthIt's time to realign GO Topeka's spending with its original mandate. Sales tax revenues should be restricted to verifiable economic development— infrastructure upgrades, business recruitment incentives, and training programs with tracked outcomes. Charities and community events deserve support, but not at the expense of roads, utilities, and jobs.Policymakers in Shawnee County must audit these grants, impose stricter criteria for what qualifies as "economic development," and consider reallocating funds to pressing infrastructure priorities. Voters approved this tax for growth, not giveaways. By refocusing on infrastructure, Topeka can build a foundation for prosperity that benefits everyone, rather than scattering dollars on short-term feel-good.
In the end, economic development isn't about charity—it's about smart, sustainable investments that pave the way for a thriving future.

https://mcremedia.blogspot.com/2024/05/fwd-go-topeka-inquiry.html


--
Henry McClure 
Time kills deals
785-383-9994

www.henrymcclure.live