Sunday, May 17, 2026

If the shoe fits

Narcissistic behaviors are centered on an inflated sense of self-importance, a deep need for admiration, and a profound lack of empathy for others. These behaviors, which can range from mild tendencies to a clinical diagnosis of Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), are designed to protect a fragile, hidden sense of insecurity by projecting an image of superiority and entitlement. [1, 2, 3]  
A mental health condition characterized by a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and lack of empathy, often causing significant impairment in relationships. Key behaviors include: 
Core Characteristics 

• Grandiose Sense of Self-Importance: Exaggerating achievements, talents, and expecting to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements. 
• Need for Excessive Admiration: Constantly requiring praise, validation, and attention to bolster their ego. 
• Lack of Empathy: Being unwilling or unable to recognize or care about the feelings, needs, and perspectives of others. 
• Sense of Entitlement: Believing they are special and deserving of favorable treatment,, often disregarding the rules or rights of others. [2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]  

Interpersonal Behaviors 

• Exploitative Relationships: Manipulating, taking advantage of, or using others to achieve their own goals. 
• Arrogant Attitudes: Displaying haughty, snobby, or disdainful behavior, often looking down on others. 
• Envy and Competition: Frequently envying others' successes or believing others are envious of them. 
• Fantasies of Power/Success: Being preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love. [3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10]  

Emotional and Tactical Responses 

• Fragile Self-Esteem: Despite the outward confidence, they are highly sensitive to criticism, reacting with rage, shame, or humiliation. 
• Gaslighting and Manipulation: Using manipulative tactics to control the narrative, distort reality, or shift blame onto others. 
• Boundary Violations: Ignoring personal boundaries, such as invading privacy or ignoring time/space constraints. 
• Boundary Blame-Shifting: Refusing to take responsibility for their actions and instead blaming others for their issues. [2, 3, 8, 10, 11, 12]  

These behaviors often form a rigid pattern that persists across different settings, such as in romantic, familial, or professional relationships. [13]  

AI responses may include mistakes.




Henry McClure
785.383.9994 

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android

City

**Deep dive into the Topeka City Council meeting on April 14, 2026 (YouTube video: ~4 hours 10 minutes).**

This was a standard regular governing body meeting with all 10 council members present (Mayor Spencer L. Duncan presiding). It followed the typical structure of proclamations, presentations, consent agenda, ordinances/resolutions, discussion items, public comment, and announcements.

### Key Segments and Timestamps (from video description)
- **0:00–3:00+**: Call to Order, Invocation (by Pastor Delmer Allen White), Pledge, Roll Call.
- **3:34–10:55**: Proclamations.
  - **Fraud Prevention Month (April 2026)**: Highlighted billions in annual fraud losses, with older adults disproportionately affected (FTC estimates up to $81.5B stolen from them in 2024, average loss ~$83K). AARP representatives spoke on education, red flags, and victim support.
  - **Take Action for Autism (last weekend of April 2026)**: Easter Seals Midwest promoted awareness, inclusion, fundraising, and their Autism Summit. Representatives emphasized new Kansas initiatives and community events (April 24–26).

- **10:55–40:20**: Appointments and presentations.
  - ADA Advisory Council annual update.
  - Friends of the Topeka Zoo update.
  - **Oakland WWTP Remediation Review** (detailed technical discussion on wastewater treatment plant issues, bacterial/mold testing, endotoxins, health concerns in affected buildings, and remediation efforts).

- **1:49:08–2:17:40**: Consent Agenda (approved with minor pull for discussion on meeting schedules) and early ordinances (e.g., property maintenance code notices, 2024 International Building Code adoption with local amendments, pet permit deadlines).

- **2:26:35 onward – Item 6D: Ordinance Amending TMC Chapter 6.30 (Chickens and Roosters)**: The most discussed and widely covered item.

### Detailed Breakdown of the Chicken Ordinance Discussion
**Current Code (pre-proposal)**: No numeric limits on poultry. Domestic fowl/poultry must be kept ≥50 feet from neighboring dwellings and cannot create a public nuisance (noise, sanitation, etc.). No permit required.

**Proposed Changes** (presented by Animal Control Supervisor Jessica Bowers):
- **Limits**: Up to **8 hens** (no roosters) on properties <3 acres. Larger properties potentially exempt or different rules.
- **Permit**: Annual permit required (~$20 fee, subject to adjustment).
- **Rationale** (cited in meeting and follow-up reporting):
  - Rising complaints about noise (especially roosters at dawn), odors, sanitation, inadequate coops/shelters, and potential health/disease risks.
  - Surge in backyard chicken popularity (post-egg price spikes, homesteading interest).
  - Enforcement challenges without clear caps or permitting for tracking/inspections.

**Council Action**: The item was **not approved** at this meeting. It was referred back to the Policy & Finance Committee for further review, refinements, and public input. As of mid-May 2026, it remained under discussion (next committee meeting: June 3, 2026, at 1:30 PM). No final vote had passed; enforcement delays (e.g., to Oct. 1, 2026) were considered in committee talks.

**Public/Community Reaction**:
- Local business owners (e.g., chicken coop builders) criticized the “magic number” of 8, fees, and perceived overreach into personal food production/homesteading.
- Concerns about impacts on self-sufficiency amid rising egg costs.
- Calls for more community engagement and comparisons to peer cities.

### Other Notable Items
- **Fee Schedule Updates** and Governing Body meeting resolutions.
- **Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Budget Discussion** (~3:16).
- **Public Comment** (~3:50): Open period for residents.
- **Announcements and Adjournment**.

### Context and Outcomes
This meeting reflects routine local governance with proactive code updates (building/property codes) alongside responsive animal control adjustments driven by constituent complaints. The chicken ordinance gained traction online due to broader cultural interest in backyard farming. It highlights tensions between urban nuisance management, public health, and resident freedoms.

For the absolute fullest details, watch the video directly (especially 2:26:35+ for chickens) or check the City of Topeka’s Granicus site for the official agenda packet and (eventual) minutes. The ordinance remains pending as of the latest reports.

Henry McClure
785.383.9994 

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android