Thursday, April 2, 2026

Staying in topeka kansas for now

Moving to Iraq is currently extremely difficult and highly discouraged due to severe, escalating security crises and complex bureaucratic requirements. 
As of April 2026, major international authorities, including the U.S. Department of State and Government of Canada, have issued "Do Not Travel" advisories, explicitly ordering citizens to leave Iraq now if they are there. [1, 2, 3]  
1. Security and Practical Barriers 
The most significant barrier to moving is the current high-risk environment: 

• Active Conflict: Escalating regional tensions and militia activity have led to the closure of Iraqi airspace; commercial flights are currently not operating out of the country. 
• Personal Safety Risks: Foreigners face high risks of kidnapping, terrorist attacks, and civil unrest. Anti-U.S. militias have specifically threatened international companies and citizens. 
• Suspended Services: The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad has suspended routine consular services and ordered non-emergency employees to depart. [1, 2, 4, 5, 6]  

2. Legal and Visa Requirements 
If you still intend to proceed, the legal process is rigid and recently changed: 

• New eVisa System: Since March 1, 2025, Iraq has suspended its previous visa-on-arrival policy for most nationalities. You must now apply for an Iraqi electronic visa (e-Visa) before traveling. 
• Residency and Work Permits: Moving permanently requires a residency permit. You generally need a confirmed job or work contract before arrival, and employers must secure a work permit for you. 
• Health Checks: Long-term residents must undergo mandatory blood tests for transmittable diseases, including HIV and Hepatitis, upon arrival to secure residency stamps. 
• Kurdistan Region: The Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) has a separate immigration system. While it previously offered easier entry, its KRG e-Visa 
 is not valid for travel to central or southern Iraq. 

3. Logistical Challenges 

• Bureaucracy: Navigating the "bureaucratic maze" often requires documents to be translated into Arabic and authenticated by an Iraqi embassy. 
• Language Barrier: Official procedures are conducted in Arabic or Kurdish; without fluency, navigating residency offices is daunting. 
• Infrastructure: While some expat compounds in Baghdad offer modern amenities (gyms, supermarkets), daily life involves frequent security checkpoints and potential disruptions to transportation. [7, 15, 16, 17, 18]  

Recommendation: Given the current security alerts 
, you should consult with your country's embassy and monitor the Smart Traveler Enrollment Program (STEP) 
 for any changes before making plans. 

AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses




Henry McClure
785.383.9994 

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android

Iraq

As of early 2026, Iraq remains a politically fragile federal parliamentary republic facing persistent security challenges from ISIS, which has shifted to a hit-and-run insurgency. While Prime Minister al-Sudani works to position Iraq as a diplomatic mediator, the country battles corruption, economic instability, and high unemployment, leading to sporadic unrest. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]  
Key Aspects of the State of the State: 

• Security Situation: Despite significant, ongoing U.S. military support, ISIS 
 remains a threat, particularly in northern areas and through sporadic attacks. The U.S. Department of State maintains a "Do Not Travel" advisory due to terror, kidnapping, and armed conflict. 
• Government & Politics: The country operates under a fragile coalition government. The government is struggling with corruption, and there are frequent protests against it. The Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) remains a more stable but sometimes tense partner to the federal government. 
• Economy: The economy is heavily dependent on oil exports and is grappling with a high public sector salary bill, as seen in the 2026 budget. 
• International Relations: Iraq is attempting to bolster its role in the region as a neutral facilitator, as noted by Secretary of State Rubio's continued engagement with both federal and KRG leaders. 
• Humanitarian Concerns: Approximately 1.2 million people remain internally displaced. [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9]  

The country continues to struggle with the aftermath of decades of conflict, relying on international partners for aid and stabilization, especially in areas formerly under ISIS 
 control. 

AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses




Henry McClure
785.383.9994 

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android

Fw: Oakland Express meeting



Henry McClure
785.383.9994 

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android

From: chas <cbaylor1@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2026 7:34:14 PM
To: chas <cbaylor1@hotmail.com>
Subject: Oakland Express meeting
 
Dear everyone,

The April issue is out—a bit late admittedly—and barely distributed at all. Let's have our monthly meeting at the Blackbird, 4025 SW 10th, 5 p.m. Thursday April 9. Bring your  criticisms of the current issue (which you probably have not seen yet), as well as your ideas for the next one. There really is so much coming up--60th anniversary of the tornado, 75th of the flood, Germanfest, the Fiesta--we just need people to write about it. First beverage on me.

--Charley

A private real-estate management company charging a standard 5% fee on MTAA’s $3.945 million non-tax income would generate only $197,262 in revenue and keep operating expenses under $140,000 — yet MTAA’s actual costs are 87 times higher, subsidized by your taxes.

 

MTAA Board of Directors – Qualifications Comparison (Current Term: December 2025 – November 2026)

The five-member MTAA Board is 100% appointed (3 City seats by the Mayor with City Council approval; 2 County seats by Shawnee County Commissioners). Kansas statute (K.S.A. 27-330) requires only that City appointees be Topeka registered voters and County appointees be Shawnee County residents living outside Topeka city limits. No aviation experience, airport management expertise, finance credentials, or infrastructure background is required.

Here is a side-by-side comparison based on public records, LinkedIn/professional profiles, board minutes, news coverage, and official bios:


















































Key Takeaways for Taxpayers
  • Aviation-specific expertise is extremely limited. Only Samuel Sutton has direct flying/pilot experience. No board member has professional airport management, FAA Part 139 compliance, large-scale FBO operations, or commercial aviation finance experience.
  • Strengths are in adjacent fields: Engineering/infrastructure (Armstrong), banking/legal/risk (Munson), small-business/transportation operations (Cortez), and community/economic development (Odupitan). These are valuable civic skills but do not substitute for specialized airport operations knowledge.
  • No statutory or public vetting for technical qualifications. Appointments appear driven by civic leadership, political connections, and community involvement rather than proven airport or complex public-authority management experience.
  • This pattern aligns with the broader issues documented in this report: an appointed board levying $5.28 million in annual property taxes while overseeing $12.18 million in 2026 expenditures, chronic operating losses, personnel costs of $5.5 million, prolonged litigation (MTAA v. Rural Development Corp. with forensic metadata issues), and the judgment.

A private real-estate management company charging a standard 5% fee on MTAA’s $3.945 million non-tax income would generate only $197,262 in revenue and keep operating expenses under $140,000 — yet MTAA’s actual costs are 87 times higher, subsidized by your taxes.

Conclusion: The current board brings civic commitment, but the lack of aviation/airport-specific qualifications underscores why the appointed structure enables opacity, inefficiency, and taxpayer exposure. This is why privatization (or expanded private FBO contracting) or an elected board (or both) is urgently needed to bring professional expertise and direct voter accountability.




 

MTAA

Molly as leading NGO

What are you thoughts on MTAA


~40–49 full-time employees. Key public roles: Eric Johnson (President), Curtis Sneden (Development), Laura Hartley (Admin/Finance), Col. John Ross & Maj. Chris Ortega (Police/Fire), Terry Poley (Maintenance), Don Loyd (Fuel)

 

Comprehensive Report for Shawnee County / Topeka Taxpayers Metropolitan Topeka Airport Authority (MTAA): A Taxing Authority That Is “Crazy Expensive,” Opaque, and Unaccountable Prepared April 2026 – Based on Official 2026 Budget, Audits, Court Documents, and Public Records

Dear Fellow Taxpayers,

The Metropolitan Topeka Airport Authority (MTAA) owns and operates Topeka Regional Airport (Forbes Field) and Philip Billard Municipal Airport. It is a separate political and taxing subdivision of the State of Kansas (K.S.A. 27-327 et seq.) that levies an ad valorem property tax mill levy on every Shawnee County / Topeka property owner.

Its 5-member board is 100% appointed — 3 seats by the Mayor (with City Council approval) and 2 seats by the Shawnee County Commissioners. There are no direct elections. This report shows why that structure has produced chronic operating losses, skyrocketing personnel costs, prolonged litigation with serious transparency red flags, and heavy reliance on federal grants while local taxpayers foot the day-to-day bill.

The numbers are “crazy expensive.” We deserve better: either full privatization (run the airports like a business) or an elected MTAA board (true “no taxation without representation”). Below is every verified fact from official sources.

1. Governance & Oversight

  • Board (appointed, not elected): Chair Michael Munson, Vice-Chair Samuel Sutton, Secretary Brian Armstrong, Carlos Cortez, Michael Odupitan (terms through Nov. 2026).
  • Your elected officials hold the power: Mayor Spencer Duncan (appoints 3 seats), City Councilperson Karen Hiller (approves the 3 City seats), and County Commissioner Kevin Cook (appoints the 2 County seats).
  • MTAA must follow Kansas Open Meetings Act and Open Records Act, but day-to-day accountability flows only through these appointees. Most Kansas taxing entities (schools, cities, counties, special districts) are elected. Appointed boards are the rare exception — and exactly why problems persist.

2. 2026 Official Budget – The Taxpayer Hit

From the newly filed 2026 Adopted Budget (certified to Shawnee County Clerk, exceeds revenue-neutral rate):

General Fund (main operating fund)

  • Expenditures: $12,179,073
  • Ad valorem tax levy (your property taxes): $5,279,625 at 2.176 mills (above the 2.141 revenue-neutral rate)
  • Self-generated non-tax income: ~$3,945,240 (leases/rents $2.5M, fees $256k, reimbursements $549k, interest $120k)
  • Personnel costs: $5,501,745 (largest line item — up from $5.19M in 2025 estimate and $4.56M actual 2024)

Non-budgeted (grant-funded) capital projects (2024 actuals shown in budget): $13.48 million in receipts/expenditures, almost entirely FAA/DOD grants for TOP Terminal, Fuel Farm, Taxiway A&D, Snow Removal Equipment, Passenger Boarding Bridge, etc.

Debt: Zero.

Bottom line: Your ~$5.28 million annual mill levy subsidizes 45–57% of operations year after year. Self-generated revenue has never come close to covering expenses.

3. Personnel & Operations

~40–49 full-time employees. Key public roles: Eric Johnson (President), Curtis Sneden (Development), Laura Hartley (Admin/Finance), Col. John Ross & Maj. Chris Ortega (Police/Fire), Terry Poley (Maintenance), Don Loyd (Fuel).

Police & Fire is the largest cost center because of FAA-mandated 24/7 Aircraft Rescue & Firefighting (ARFF). Forbes Field is joint-use with the Kansas Air National Guard’s 190th Air Refueling Wing (KC-135 tankers, potential KC-46). The military presence raises the FAA ARFF Index — requiring bigger vehicles and more on-duty staff. Military side funds its own fire/security; MTAA’s costs are for civilian certification (which unlocks federal grants).

4. Capital Projects & Federal Grants

  • Philip Billard New Terminal: General contractor Icon Structures (Wichita) — $4,669,000 contract (lowest bid, awarded Oct. 2022). Funded by federal CARES Act + Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) — zero local tax dollars for construction. Opened 2024.
  • Forbes Field: $30M+ in federal AIP/CARES/BIL grants since 2020 for runways, taxiways, fuel farm, ARFF truck ($870k), north apron ($5.986M in 2026), etc. DOD/190th ARW matching funds also appear.

Federal money builds the shiny stuff. Your taxes keep the lights on.

5. The Active Lawsuit & Transparency Failures

Metropolitan Topeka Airport Authority v. Rural Development Corporation (Shawnee County Case No. 2019-CV-816)

  • Filed 2019 over a February 3, 2016 lease for Building 281 — still active 7+ years later.
  • MTAA retained digital forensics expert Michael Snodgrass (INS Professionals LLC).
  • Feb. 20, 2025 Deposition (by defense counsel Bryan W. Smith): Snodgrass testified on his CV and findings.
  • Forensic Report (Exhibit 29, dated 01/15/2021): Analyzed two lease versions. Original MTAA file (“1925.01 Bldg 281 Lease.doc”) last modified by Jane Young on Dec. 3, 2015. RDC-produced “revised” version shows attorney Bryan Smith modified it on Feb. 2, 2016 — yet its “Last Printed” date remains Dec. 3, 2015. Snodgrass concluded it “does not appear possible” the revised document produced the printed lease. This raises serious questions about document authenticity and discovery.

Citizen Carol Marple highlighted similar issues at the February 2026 Shawnee County Commission meeting regarding the separate Zebell judgment (~$1.8–2 million owed to longtime tenant Bob Zebell, entered Dec. 2025). She cited lack of transparency, potential abuse of power, high manager salaries, holiday parties with alcohol, and taxpayer exposure.

Legal services already exceeded $93k in 2023; this case and the Zebell matter add expert fees, attorney hours, and staff time — all ultimately subsidized by your mill levy.

6. The Private Real-Estate Management Hypothetical

If MTAA operated like a normal private property management company charging a standard 5% fee on collected income:

  • Gross non-tax income base (2026 budget) = $3,945,240
  • 5% fee revenue = $197,262
  • Realistic operating expenses for a lean private firm = $70,000 – $140,000 (leaving room for profit).

Actual MTAA General Fund spending = $12,179,073 (with $5.5 million in personnel alone). The difference is paid by your taxes. A private company could not survive on a 5% fee while spending $12 million — it would go out of business. MTAA survives only because it is a taxing authority with no direct voter accountability.

7. The Core Problem & the Solution

MTAA levies $5.28 million in property taxes every year yet its board is appointed, not elected. This structure has produced:

  • Chronic multimillion-dollar operating losses
  • Personnel costs that dwarf any private equivalent
  • Prolonged litigation with forensic red flags
  • Opaque spending highlighted by citizens like Carol Marple

We the taxpayers deserve better.

Recommended actions:

  1. Privatize the airports so they are run like a business (no more tax subsidy).
  2. Make the MTAA board elected (direct voter accountability).
  3. Or pursue a combination of both.

Your elected officials — Mayor Spencer Duncan, Commissioner Kevin Cook, and Councilperson Karen Hiller — have the statutory power to make this happen. They appoint the entire board and can champion statutory changes or refuse reappointments.

Call to Action

Contact them today. Demand full disclosure of the MTAA v. RDC case, the Zebell judgment, and all spending. Demand they either privatize MTAA or make the board elected.

The three letters below are ready to send. Copy, paste, attach this report + the 2026 budget PDF + Snodgrass deposition/forensic exhibits, and hit “send.”


Letter to Mayor Spencer Duncan Subject: Urgent Demand for MTAA Reform – Privatize or Elect the Board: $5.28M Annual Tax Levy Is Unsustainable

Dear Mayor Duncan,

As a Topeka resident and taxpayer, I demand you exercise your appointment authority over the Metropolitan Topeka Airport Authority under K.S.A. 27-330. The facts in the attached comprehensive taxpayer report prove MTAA is “crazy expensive” and unaccountable: $12.18 million in 2026 General Fund spending, $5.28 million tax levy, $5.5 million personnel costs, a 7-year lawsuit with forensic metadata discrepancies (Snodgrass report), and the Zebell judgment. A private 5% management company would operate the same assets for under $140,000 in expenses — yet we subsidize 87 times that amount with local taxes while federal grants pay for capital projects.

Appointed boards that tax us violate “no taxation without representation.” I request you immediately:

  1. Demand full public disclosure of the MTAA v. Rural Development Corporation file, Zebell judgment payments, and all board decisions.
  2. Refuse reappointment of any board member tied to this opacity and mismanagement.
  3. Champion legislation or charter changes to make MTAA board seats electedor pursue full privatization.

Please provide a written action plan within 14 days. I am available to meet.

Sincerely, [Your Full Name] [Your Address] [Phone / Email]


Letter to Commissioner Kevin Cook (Identical content — change salutation and first sentence to “As a Shawnee County resident and taxpayer…”)


Letter to Councilperson Karen Hiller (Identical content — change salutation and first sentence to “As a Topeka resident in your district and taxpayer…”)


This report and the letters give every taxpayer the full picture. Share the report widely (social media, neighborhood meetings, next County Commission or City Council session). The more of us who speak up, the faster change happens.

If you need a printable PDF version, one-page flyer, or any tweaks, just let me know. Together we can end the taxpayer-funded bloat at MTAA.

MTAA Hires Curtis Sneden as Inaugural Director of Development — TK Business  Magazine

Bottom Line for Taxpayers & MTAA Reform

Kansas Airport Privatizations: A Deep Dive (No Full Precedents Exist)
Kansas has no fully privatized airports. All 387 public-use and private airports listed in FAA records (including Topeka Regional/Forbes Field and Philip Billard) remain under public ownership or authority structures. Searches across official sources, news archives, and FAA programs confirm this: no Kansas airport has been sold, leased long-term to a private operator, or transferred out of public control in a manner that eliminates public ownership or taxing authority.
What Has Happened Instead?
Kansas airports follow the national pattern for general-aviation (GA) and small commercial facilities:
  • Public ownership with private contractors: Most airports (like MTAA) are owned by cities, counties, or authorities. They often contract out day-to-day operations to Fixed Base Operators (FBOs) for fuel sales, maintenance, hangars, and ground handling. Examples:
    • Ottawa Municipal Airport: Managed/operated by a contracted private FBO.
    • Johnson County Executive Airport: County-owned and operated via its Airport Commission, with private FBO services.
    • Many small GA airports (e.g., Augusta, Pittsburg/Atkinson) use private FBOs or city contracts for fuel and services while the airport itself stays public.
  • TSA screening privatization (partial, not airport ownership): Kansas City International Airport (MCI, Missouri side but serving the KC metro) uses private contractors for passenger screening under the TSA's Screening Partnership Program. This has been discussed as a model during federal shutdowns to avoid disruptions, but it applies only to security screening — the airport itself remains city-owned and public.
  • Past privatization discussions (never implemented):
    • Kansas City International (MCI): In 2009 and 2015, city officials explored leasing the airport to a private operator to generate revenue (potentially $1+ billion). Proposals were defeated by the City Council or withdrawn. MCI is now completing a $1.5 billion public-funded single-terminal project.
    • No similar proposals appear for Topeka Regional (Forbes Field) or other Kansas GA airports.
Federal Barriers to Privatization (Critical for MTAA)
MTAA receives tens of millions in FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants, CARES Act funds, and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) money for runways, terminals, fuel farms, etc. Full privatization is governed by the FAA Airport Investment Partnership Program (formerly Airport Privatization Pilot Program, established 1997). Key rules:
  • Only a limited number of U.S. airports can participate (currently very few slots; none in Kansas).
  • Sponsors must repay federal grants or agree to continued public-use obligations.
  • Private operators must maintain public access, safety standards, and non-discrimination rules.
  • Revenue from the airport generally cannot be diverted to non-airport uses without FAA approval.
No Kansas airport has ever entered this program. Most Kansas airports (including MTAA) continue receiving annual FAA/Kansas grants for infrastructure, reinforcing public ownership.
Feasibility for MTAA Specifically
  • Full privatization (selling/transferring ownership or long-term lease to a private company) would require:
    • State legislative approval (K.S.A. 27-327 et seq. governs MTAA as a public authority).
    • Repayment or forgiveness of all outstanding federal grants.
    • A buyer/operator willing to assume operations without the $5.28 million annual tax subsidy.
    • Voter or elected-official approval (your commissioner, councilperson, and mayor appoint the board and could initiate this).
  • Partial privatization (more realistic short-term step) is already happening elsewhere in Kansas: Expand private FBO contracts for fuel, maintenance, hangars, and even some management functions. MTAA already uses private FBOs at Billard and is leasing land for new hangars (e.g., recent Davcon Aviation deal for an 80,000 sq ft cargo/MRO hangar at Forbes). This could reduce personnel costs and tax reliance without full sale.
  • Elected board as alternative: Far simpler legally — amend K.S.A. 27-330 via the Kansas Legislature to make the 5 seats elected. This keeps public ownership but adds direct voter accountability (the model used by almost every other Kansas taxing entity).
Bottom Line for Taxpayers & MTAA Reform
Kansas has zero examples of full airport privatization. The closest are private FBO contracts and one-off TSA screening pilots. MTAA's heavy federal grant dependency, joint military use at Forbes, and role as a public authority make full privatization complex and unprecedented in the state — but not impossible with legislative action.
This strengthens your case for the letters we drafted: privatize (or expand private contracting) OR make the board elected (or both). The current appointed model has produced the $12.18 million budget, $5.5 million personnel line, lawsuit opacity, and ongoing tax subsidy with no private-sector efficiency pressure.
Next Steps You Can Take
  1. Attach this exploration (or the full report) to the letters to Mayor Duncan, Commissioner Cook, and Councilperson Hiller.
  2. Ask them directly: "Has the City/County explored private FBO expansion or full privatization options for MTAA? If not, why not — given the $5.28 million annual taxpayer cost?"
If you want me to:
  • Draft a specific "privatization feasibility" section for your taxpayer report
  • Search for model private FBO contracts from other states
  • Or refine the letters with this new Kansas-specific context
—just let me know. The facts are clear: Kansas has not gone the privatization route yet, which makes your push for reform even more timely and impactful.


Henry McClure on TikTok



Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals