Thursday, July 16, 2026

1. Exact Statutory Language (Key Sections of SB 98)

 Definition of “Qualified Data Center” (New Section 1(g)):

“Qualified data center” means one or more buildings that are constructed, reconstructed, enlarged, remodeled or leased to house a group of networked computer servers in this state to centralize the storage, management and dissemination of data and information pertaining to a particular business, taxonomy or body of knowledge and such buildings are connected to each other by fiber and associated equipment required for operating a fiber transmission network between data center buildings and internet points for the purpose of providing redundancy and resiliency for the data center services provided in each building.

Core Qualification (New Section 2(a)):

A qualified firm that makes an investment in eligible data center costs in a qualified data center of at least $250,000,000 in the aggregate by the fifth year of operations and creates and maintains at least 20 new jobs at the qualified data center within two calendar years after the commencement of operations shall receive a sales tax exemption...

Electricity Rate Prohibition (amended K.S.A. 66-101j):

A customer shall not be eligible for the discount authorized by this section for any new or expanded facility that is a qualified data center as defined in section 1, and amendments thereto.

Water Conservation Commitment (Section 2(b)(5)): The firm must commit to practices that will conserve, reuse and replace water, including (but not limited to) efficient fixtures, rainwater harvesting, recirculation, reclaimed water use, and watershed restoration support.

Clawback / Cure (Section 2(c)): 120-day cure period after written notice of breach. If not cured, Commerce can require repayment of all or part of the sales tax exemption received, terminate the exemption, or suspend it.


2. Comparison to Neighboring States (2026)

StateMain IncentiveMin InvestmentMin JobsDurationPower Discount Allowed?Security Review?Notes / Strength vs KS
Kansas100% state + local sales tax$250M2020 yearsNoYes (KIFC)Strongest security + ratepayer protection
Missouri100% state + local sales tax$25M (new) / $5M (expand)10 (new) / 5 (expand)Up to 15 yearsYes (local deals common)NoMuch lower thresholds; heavy local Chapter 100 property tax abatements (often 90%+ for 20+ years)
IowaSales tax exemption or refund$200M (full) or $1M–$10M (partial)Varies10–15 years (recently limited)YesNoLower bar; also property tax exemption starting 2027
NebraskaSales tax exemption on equipment + construction materials$3M–$37M+ (tiered)30+ or maintain employmentMulti-yearYesNoFlexible tiers via Advantage/ImagiNE programs
OklahomaSales tax exemption on equipment/machinery (and sometimes power for certain NAICS)None specificNone specificOngoingPartialNoBroad computer services exemption
ColoradoProposed/debated 20–30 year sales tax exemption (HB26-1030 style)VariesVaries20–30 yearsYesNoNot as mature; fiscal pushback ongoing

Takeaway: Kansas has the highest investment threshold ($250M) and the strongest ratepayer and security protections. Missouri is currently the most aggressive competitor in the KC metro with much lower bars and huge local property tax deals. Iowa and Nebraska are also active but less “hyperscale-focused.”


3. Sample Local Zoning Language That Interacts with SB 98

Here’s clean, professional language you (or a city/county attorney) can adapt for Topeka, Shawnee County, or any Kansas jurisdiction. It is designed to work with SB 98 while giving locals real control.

text
Section X.XX – Data Centers and Related Facilities

A. Definition. “Data Center” means a facility whose primary purpose is the storage, management, processing, and dissemination of digital data, including but not limited to facilities that would qualify as a “qualified data center” under K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 74-50,331 et seq. (SB 98).

B. Zoning Districts. Data Centers shall be permitted only in the following districts as a Conditional Use or Special Use Permit: [I-2 Heavy Industrial / PUD / specific overlay]. They are prohibited in all residential, agricultural, commercial, and mixed-use districts unless specifically rezoned after public hearing.

C. Additional Requirements for Conditional/Special Use Approval:
   1. Minimum lot size of 40 acres (or as determined by City/County).
   2. Minimum setbacks of 500 feet from any residential zoning district or dwelling, and 200 feet from any public right-of-way.
   3. Noise, vibration, light, and dust standards stricter than general industrial (e.g., no more than 55 dBA at property line, zero detectable off-site vibration).
   4. Water Conservation Plan approved by [City Water / County] that demonstrates net-zero or better impact on local aquifers and surface water (air-cooled or closed-loop preferred).
   5. Written will-serve letters from the electric utility and water provider confirming capacity without adverse impact on existing customers.
   6. Landscape and screening plan that fully conceals the facility from public view within 5 years.
   7. Decommissioning bond or escrow in an amount sufficient to restore the site.
   8. Community Benefits Agreement (optional but strongly preferred) addressing local hiring, road improvements, and annual payments in lieu of taxes.

D. Interaction with State Incentives. Approval of a Conditional Use Permit does not constitute endorsement for any state incentive under SB 98. The governing body may condition approval on the applicant agreeing not to seek, or to waive, any local portion of the SB 98 sales tax exemption, or on additional local performance guarantees.

E. Temporary Moratorium Authority. The governing body may by resolution impose a temporary moratorium of up to 12 months on new applications for Data Centers while studying impacts.

This language has already been used (in pieces) in places like Independence, Spring Hill, and Topeka’s recent discussions.


4. Analysis of the Compass Datacenters Proposal (Topeka / Shawnee County)

Current Status (as of July 16, 2026):

  • Proposed ~60 MW campus near the Walmart distribution center area in Shawnee County / Topeka vicinity.
  • No formal application submitted yet (as of early July).
  • Compass has been in preliminary talks with the City and County.
  • City of Topeka just enacted a 12-month moratorium (July 14–15, 2026) on data centers and battery storage systems specifically to study impacts — this freezes any city-side progress.
  • Shawnee County approved a resolution in early July raising conditional-use permit fees for “intelligence industry” projects to $15,000 and setting some frameworks.
  • Recent public controversy: Compass representative walked away from a scheduled meeting with local landowners when media arrived (July 15).

Under SB 98 Rules:

  • 60 MW is large enough that it will almost certainly clear the $250M investment threshold (hyperscale campuses routinely exceed this).
  • 20 permanent jobs is easy for them to meet (they typically create more).
  • They will need a 10-year power purchase agreement with Evergy and a water plan.
  • They must pass KIFC review (Compass is U.S.-based, so this is usually straightforward unless foreign tenants or technology raise flags).
  • They are ineligible for any discounted economic-development electricity rates.

Local Leverage Points:

  • Zoning / Conditional Use is still required → moratorium and high fees buy time.
  • Water, noise, traffic, and visual impact remain fully under local control.
  • Public pressure is already high and effective (Topeka moratorium is direct proof).
  • You can demand the Community Benefits Agreement language above as a condition of any future approval.

Bottom line on Compass: It is a real prospect but currently stalled by the City’s 12-month pause and rising local opposition. It is a classic “test case” of SB 98 — state incentives are ready and waiting, but local land-use control is still the decisive gate.


Kansas SB 98 – Summary and Deep Dive (Enacted 2025, effective July 1, 2025)

Quick Summary

SB 98 created the Kansas Data Center Sales Tax Exemption Program. It offers a 20-year 100% state and local sales and use tax exemption on construction, equipment, and related costs for large-scale data centers that invest at least $250 million and create at least 20 new full-time Kansas-resident jobs.

Key strings attached:

  • Must buy power from the local utility for 10 years.
  • Must have a water conservation plan.
  • Must pass a cybersecurity/critical-infrastructure review by the Kansas Intelligence Fusion Center (KIFC).
  • Explicitly banned from receiving the normal economic-development discounted electricity rates that other large industrial customers can get.

It is the state’s main tool to attract hyperscale and large data centers while trying to protect ratepayers and national security interests.


Deep Dive

1. Legislative Purpose and Background

SB 98 (Chapter 124 of the 2025 Session Laws) was designed to make Kansas competitive in the national race for AI and cloud data center investment.

It does three main things:

  1. Creates a long-duration sales tax exemption for qualified data centers.
  2. Prohibits public utilities from giving data centers the standard 40%/20% economic-development electricity rate discounts.
  3. Requires a mandatory national-security-style review before any public incentive can be awarded.

The bill amends K.S.A. 79-3606 (sales tax exemptions) by adding new subsection (xxxx) and amends K.S.A. 66-101j (electric utility economic development rates) to carve data centers out of the discount program.

2. Key Definitions (from the statute)

  • Qualified Data Center: One or more buildings (or leased space) in Kansas that house networked computer servers for storage, management, and dissemination of data. Buildings must be connected by fiber for redundancy and resiliency.
  • Qualified Firm: A business (or affiliate) registered with the Kansas Secretary of State that is engaged in developing, operating, or leasing a qualified data center. Excludes traditional telecom, wireless, and video service providers.
  • Eligible Data Center Costs: Land, buildings, site improvements, data center equipment, software, engineering/design, permitting, site characterization, lease payments, and other direct costs. Electricity costs are excluded.
  • Data Center Equipment: Servers, routers, cooling systems (chillers, towers, fans), generators, cabling, software, security systems, water conservation systems, and related personal property used exclusively for data processing/storage/communication.
  • New Jobs: Full-time positions filled by Kansas residents, located at or directly associated with the data center.

3. Eligibility Requirements

To qualify, a firm must:

RequirementDetailsDeadline
Capital Investment≥ $250 million in eligible data center costsBy end of 5th year of operations
Job Creation≥ 20 new full-time jobs filled by Kansas residentsWithin 2 years of commencement of operations
ElectricitySigned 10-year purchase agreement with the local retail electric utilityRequired in the Incentive Agreement
WaterComprehensive water conservation/reuse planRequired for approval
Security ReviewFull KIFC review + Fusion Center Oversight Board approvalBefore any incentive is awarded
Construction StartMust begin construction within 10 years of the agreement (or earlier as negotiated)Per Incentive Agreement
OtherRegistered & in good standing with Kansas SOS; project capital not from federally sanctioned entitiesOngoing

The exemption period is 20 years from commencement of operations (or as certified).

4. What the Exemption Covers

100% exemption from state and local sales and use tax on:

  • Tangible personal property and services used in construction, reconstruction, enlargement, or remodeling.
  • Purchase and installation of data center equipment and eligible data center costs.
  • Labor to install, repair, service, alter, or maintain data center equipment.

It does not cover electricity, construction tools/machinery of the contractor, or general administrative equipment.

5. Critical Side Provisions

Electricity Rate Ban (the most important “protection”) Public utilities cannot grant data centers the economic-development rate discounts available to other large industrial customers under K.S.A. 66-101j. This was intentional — Kansas lawmakers wanted the tax break but did not want residential ratepayers subsidizing cheap power for data centers.

KIFC Security Review Before Commerce can approve the incentive, the Kansas Intelligence Fusion Center evaluates:

  • Equipment and software
  • Ownership structure and foreign affiliations
  • Operational purpose
  • Critical infrastructure risk

The Fusion Center Oversight Board can approve, require modifications, or deny. This is a national-security gate that most states do not have.

Water Conservation Applicants must submit a plan that typically includes recirculation, rainwater harvesting, reclaimed water, efficient cooling, etc. Air-cooled or closed-loop systems are strongly preferred by communities.

6. Application & Certification Process

  1. Submit complete application + $1,000 non-refundable fee to Kansas Department of Commerce.
  2. Simultaneously submit detailed technical/ownership package directly to KIFC (Commerce never sees the sensitive materials).
  3. KIFC / Oversight Board review and approval.
  4. Commerce eligibility review.
  5. Execute binding Incentive Agreement.
  6. Commerce issues Certification Letter to Kansas Department of Revenue.
  7. KDOR issues the project exemption certificate (Form PR-70 series process).
  8. Contractor uses the certificate for tax-free purchases and retains invoices for 5 years.

Applications are accepted year-round.

7. Compliance, Monitoring & Clawbacks

  • Commerce conducts ongoing monitoring + mandatory formal review every 5 years.
  • Firms must report investment, jobs, power purchases, and water measures.
  • 120-day cure period for deficiencies.
  • Remedies for uncured breaches: suspension, modification, termination of the exemption, and clawback (repayment of previously exempted sales tax, proportional to the violation).
  • False information or failure to cooperate can trigger full recapture.

8. Practical Implications (“The Real Deal”)

  • Attractiveness: The 20-year full sales tax holiday is one of the cleaner, longer incentives in the Midwest. Combined with land availability and (in many places) power headroom, it is working — planned capacity in Kansas has exploded since mid-2025.
  • Ratepayer Protection: Stronger than many peer states. Data centers pay full or premium industrial rates and fund their own upgrades.
  • Local Control Still Intact: The state incentive does not override local zoning. Cities and counties can still impose moratoriums, special-use permits, or refuse rezoning (as Topeka did in July 2026).
  • Jobs Reality: Only 20 permanent jobs required. Most employment is temporary construction. Multipliers (indirect jobs) exist but are often overstated.
  • Water & Noise: These remain the biggest local flashpoints. The statute requires a water plan but does not set hard numerical limits — that is left to local negotiation and permitting.
  • Security Layer: The KIFC review is unique and can slow or kill projects with problematic foreign ownership or technology.

Bottom Line

SB 98 is a deliberate, carefully structured invitation to large data centers. Kansas opened the door with a generous tax exemption while building in two major guardrails (no power discounts + mandatory intelligence review).

The horse is out of the barn at the state level. Whether individual projects succeed now depends almost entirely on local zoning, politics, water availability, and community resistance. 

I say the horse is out of the barn, what do you say? Yes — the horse is largely out of the barn at the state level, but local zoning and political resistance still give neighborhoods real leverage.

Here's the clear-eyed breakdown of data centers in Kansas as of mid-July 2026.

Current Landscape

Kansas has a small existing footprint but a massive pipeline. Operating capacity is only about 20 MW across a handful of facilities (mostly smaller/colocation sites). Planned projects would add roughly 1,350 MW, for a potential total around 1,370 MW.

The market is concentrated near the Kansas City metro (both KS and MO sides) and is spilling into rural areas. Sources tracking facilities put total data centers (operating + smaller) in the low-to-mid 20s, with hyperscale interest rising fast. Examples of activity include:

  • Industrial parks marketing specifically for data centers (e.g., Great Plains Industrial Park).
  • Proposed hyperscale or large projects in places like Emporia (“Flint Hills Digital Campus”), Osawatomie, Leavenworth area, Pottawatomie/Manhattan region, and near Topeka.
  • Compass Datacenters has been in preliminary talks for a ~60 MW facility near Topeka (around the Walmart distribution area). No formal application yet in some reports, but enough chatter to trigger local backlash.

Kansas is being pitched nationally as a secondary/power-available market for AI/cloud growth, with advantages in land, fiber, and (until recently) more flexible local rules compared to overloaded Virginia or Texas hotspots.

State-Level Incentives and Policy: Horse Is Out

Yes, the state deliberately opened the door in 2025.

SB 98 (enacted 2025, effective July 1, 2025) created the Kansas Data Center Sales Tax Exemption Program, administered by the Department of Commerce:

  • 20-year 100% state and local sales/use tax exemption on construction materials, equipment, eligible data center costs, certain labor, etc.
  • Minimum thresholds: $250 million capital investment (completed within 5 years of operations) + 20 new full-time Kansas-resident jobs (within 2 years of operations).
  • Requirements: 10-year electricity purchase agreement with the local retail utility; comprehensive water conservation plan; cybersecurity/critical-infrastructure review and approval by the Kansas Intelligence Fusion Center (KIFC) + Oversight Board.
  • Application is year-round with a $1,000 fee; final certification goes to the Department of Revenue.

Important protections built in (this is the “not a free-for-all” part):

  • Data centers are explicitly barred from the standard economic-development discounted electricity rates (the 40%/20% deals other large industrial customers can get). Kansas law prohibits public utilities from granting those to data centers.
  • Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) large-load rules (approved Nov 2025) require big users (75 MW+) to sign long-term contracts (12–17 years), post collateral, pay high minimum demand charges, and fund their own transmission upgrades. They effectively pay market or premium rates and cannot shift costs directly onto residential ratepayers.

There have been follow-on bills (e.g., SB 526) that would further restrict the sales-tax exemption to land that was already zoned industrial/manufacturing or unzoned as of July 1, 2025. That would make it harder for developers to chase greenfield ag land purely for the incentive.

Bottom line on state policy: Kansas wants the capital investment, construction jobs, tax base (property taxes largely remain), utility infrastructure upgrades, and AI/digital-economy positioning. It is actively competing for these projects with a clean, long-duration sales-tax holiday while trying to shield ordinary ratepayers on power costs and requiring security reviews. No statewide moratorium or ban has passed; attempts in the 2026 session mostly died.

Zoning and Local Control: Still the Real Battlefield

Kansas does not preempt local zoning for data centers. Cities and counties retain authority over land-use decisions, special-use permits, rezoning, site plans, and temporary moratoriums. That is where the “local guy” still has power.

What’s happening on the ground (2026):

  • Topeka just passed a 12-month moratorium (voted ~July 14–15, 2026) on new data centers and battery energy storage systems to study health/safety/infrastructure impacts. Triggered by resident pushback and Compass interest.
  • Similar pauses or tighter rules in Independence (considering 180-day moratorium + special-use requirements), Geary County, Sedgwick County (earlier temporary pause for zoning review), Jackson County (MO side), Spring Hill, Osawatomie, Emporia, and others.
  • Kansas City, MO (highly relevant for the metro) reclassified data centers as industrial uses, limited districts, required special approvals/will-serve letters for large ones, and added noise/vibration/ground-floor limits downtown.
  • Rural counties often start with ag zoning, so any project needs rezoning or annexation — which creates public-hearing flashpoints.

Developers prefer already-industrial or unzoned land (especially with SB 98 incentives), fiber, and abundant power. Where locals organize early (public comment, moratoriums, zoning text amendments requiring special permits + impact studies), they can slow or kill projects. Where officials chase “economic development” hard or zoning is loose, projects move faster.

Is the Local Fight a No-Win Battle Against Corporate America + the Statehouse?

Not completely no-win, but it is asymmetric and exhausting.

  • Advantages for opponents: Zoning is local. Moratoriums buy time. Public pressure works (Topeka just proved it). Water, noise, visual impact, property values, and long-term power/water infrastructure risks are legitimate local concerns. Direct permanent jobs are low (often ~100 or fewer per large facility; most employment is temporary construction). Modern air-cooled or closed-loop systems can minimize water use, but communities must demand those commitments in writing.
  • Advantages for the other side: Enormous capital ($250M+ minimum for the big incentive). State incentives reduce effective costs. Utilities get large, predictable loads that justify transmission builds. Construction booms help local contractors. National AI race narrative + “if not here, somewhere else” pressure. Deep legal and lobbying resources. Once a site is industrial-zoned and power-secured, momentum is hard to reverse.
  • The “matrix” reality: Data centers are the physical backbone of cloud, AI, streaming, banking, logistics, etc. Demand is structural and exploding. Kansas (and every Midwestern state with power and land) will keep getting pitched. Fighting every single one is like fighting the internet in 1998 — you can shape the terms, demand better cooling/setbacks/taxes, and protect sensitive areas, but you cannot stop the overall wave.

Practical Takeaway

The state already “let the horse out” with SB 98 and related rules. The incentive is real and working as designed to attract large projects while protecting residential power rates more than many states. Locals still control the land-use gate and are actively using it (Topeka’s brand-new moratorium is proof). A neighborhood fighter is not powerless — organized, early, fact-based opposition focused on zoning, water plans, noise, traffic, and net fiscal impact can win or extract major concessions. But pure “stop everything” is fighting both corporate capital and a state policy that has already chosen to compete for these facilities.