Truth

The post you shared from LindellTV (associated with Mike Lindell and featuring reporter Cara Castronuova) describes a recent confrontation where Castronuova questioned Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) as he exited a January 6-related hearing. She pressed him on topics like the death of Rosanne Boyland, accountability for January 6 events, his "autopen pardon," and potential future legal consequences for those involved in J6 (including himself). According to the post and similar recent shares on X, Raskin did not respond to any questions and walked away, prompting Castronuova's parting remark: "Thank you for the lies, Congressman. Keep spreading the propaganda."

This aligns with recent activity: Castronuova, now White House correspondent for LindellTV and a contributor to outlets like The Gateway Pundit, has been vocal on J6 issues for years. Recent X posts (from today, January 15, 2026) share the same or similar video clips of her confronting Raskin, describing her as a "truth warrior" pushing back against what they call lies from Raskin and former J6 committee members.

### Context on the Key Issues Raised

- **Rosanne Boyland's death**: Boyland died during the January 6, 2021, Capitol events. Official medical examiner reports concluded it was accidental acute amphetamine intoxication (drug overdose), with crowd crush contributing as she collapsed near the lower west terrace tunnel. Some conservative sources and activists (including Castronuova) allege police involvement, citing video of an officer (Lila Morris) striking a motionless person on the ground with a baton, claiming it contributed to or caused the death. Fact-checks and official accounts maintain it was not homicide by police, and no charges resulted from that specific action.

- **Accountability for January 6**: This remains highly partisan. Raskin was a key member of the House January 6 Select Committee, which investigated the attack as an insurrection. Hearings continue into 2026 (e.g., recent ones marking the 5-year anniversary and addressing pardons).

- **"Autopen pardon"**: In January 2025, outgoing President Biden issued preemptive pardons to members of the J6 committee (including Raskin) to shield them from potential future prosecution under the incoming Trump administration. Some critics (including Trump allies) claimed these were invalid if signed via autopen (a mechanical device for signatures). Raskin and others dismissed those claims as baseless, with no evidence they were voided.

- **Future legal consequences**: With Trump back in office and having pardoned many J6 defendants, the dynamic has shifted. Raskin has spoken out against broad pardons for rioters and called for hearings on related issues (e.g., crimes by pardoned individuals or hiring of former rioters in federal roles). No prosecutions of J6 committee members have occurred.

The video appears authentic based on matching descriptions and shares today, but it's from a strongly partisan source (LindellTV, tied to election fraud claims and pro-Trump/MAGA perspectives). Raskin has not publicly addressed this specific exchange in available recent coverage, consistent with politicians often avoiding ambush-style questions outside formal settings.

If this is the "truth" you're asking about, the core event (the unanswered confrontation) seems to have happened recently, but the framing and implications are heavily interpretive depending on political viewpoint. If you have the direct video link or more details, I can dig further!

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

J6th

Really 

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

KORA

Please send a copy of the fee schedule approved at January 13th meeting of city council 

KORA 

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

Governments suck

The claim in the post from @OffThePress (shared about 1 day ago) is **largely accurate** based on recent reporting, though the figure is slightly rounded up and the payments are described as "potentially erroneous" or "questionable" rather than definitively proven fraudulent in every case.

According to a New York Post article (widely cited and republished across outlets like AOL, Hannity.com, Fox News, and others in early January 2026), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) conducted a review of fiscal year 2024 rental assistance payments (October 2023–September 2024, during the Biden administration). Key details include:

- **Nationwide**: HUD flagged about **$5.8 billion** in "questionable" rental assistance payments out of roughly **$50 billion** distributed overall (primarily through Tenant-Based Rental Assistance and Project-Based Rental Assistance programs). This included payments to approximately **30,000 deceased tenants** and thousands of possible non-citizens, with issues like unverified eligibility affecting over 200,000 tenants.

- **Minnesota-specific**: The review identified **$84.6 million** in potentially erroneous or ineligible payments to Minnesota housing authorities (across 61 entities). This is the figure most sources report, though some round it to "nearly $85 million" or "up to $84–$85 million."

  - This included up to **$496,000** tied to **509 deceased tenants**.

  - Another **$246,000** went to **20 people** whose Social Security numbers couldn't be verified (likely non-citizens or ineligible).

- Current HUD Secretary Scott Turner (under the Trump administration) criticized the Biden-era HUD for "lack of stewardship" and "failure to implement strong financial controls," stating it amounted to a "massive abuse of taxpayer dollars." He emphasized that deceased recipients appeared in all 50 states, with concentrations in places like New York, California, and D.C.

- The audit notes these are **potentially erroneous** payments—flagged via data matching (e.g., against Treasury death records)—but it did not fully confirm fraud in every instance. Investigations are ongoing, and accountability measures are being discussed.

This fits into broader scrutiny of Minnesota's handling of federal funds, amid separate (but unrelated) large-scale fraud probes into state-run Medicaid programs like Housing Stabilization Services, child care, and others under Gov. Tim Walz—though those involve state-administered programs rather than direct HUD rental assistance.

The post's core facts align with the New York Post's reporting and HUD's findings, which have been echoed by conservative-leaning outlets and officials. No major retractions or debunkings appear in recent coverage. If you're looking for the original New York Post piece or more context on the nationwide audit, let me know!

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

Kansas House Speaker Dan Hawkins Delivers Republican Response to the Gov...