Posts

Topeka Consultant Spending vs. Payroll: What the Data Shows

A City of Topeka KORA response shows Public Works and Utilities alone paid $20.7M (2024) and $17.9M (2025) on professional engineering and contract-service lines, and a separate KORA response shows Bartlett & West was paid $52.37M over ten years (Dec. 2015–Dec. 2025), about $436K a month. That is far above what the operating budgets imply. General Fund ratios still look normal against Springfield, MO, so the evidence supports heavy, concentrated reliance on a few outside firms, not a proven lack of in-house competence. On this page Bottom line Topeka: professional services by year Share of payroll and budget Peer benchmark Henry's specific claims Payments by firm (KORA records) Bartlett & West: 10 years of payments Definitions and data gaps Draft post language Sources Contact Bottom line Reliance confirmed; incompetence not proven. City payment records obtained by KORA show Bartlett & West was paid $52,371,843 from Dec. 31, 2015 to Dec. 5, 2025, about $436K a month, mor...

Fw: The But-For Test Is the Failure: Topeka Should Retire It

From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2026 1:31 PM To: marcusm@topeka.org <marcusm@topeka.org>; Governing Body <governingbody@topeka.org>; City Clerk <cclerk@topeka.org>; Braxton Copley <bcopley@topeka.org>; John Kollhoff <johnkollhoff@gmail.com> Subject: The But-For Test Is the Failure: Topeka Should Retire It The But-For Test Is the Failure: Topeka Should Retire It Take one Topeka building as an example. A city water main broke, and deferred maintenance meant there was no way to shut it off. Water backed up inside and flooded the space, and the sheetrock was ruined. The owner has spent years paying for damage he didn't cause. If that owner ever wanted to set up a Community Improvement District (CID) to help rebuild, he would first have to pay a consultant to run a "but-for" test. That's a theoretical exercise to decide whether the project "needs" help and what his rate of...