Posts

There is no single universal “best,” but clear patterns emerge from lab testing, independent rankings, sales data, and enthusiast consensus.

What Actually Matters in a Lion’s Mane Extract Lion’s Mane ( Hericium erinaceus ) works primarily through two groups of compounds that stimulate nerve growth factor (NGF): Hericenones — mainly in the fruiting body. Erinacines (especially Erinacine A) — mainly in the mycelium; some research suggests they are more potent and better at crossing the blood-brain barrier. Key quality markers: Fruiting body vs. mycelium-on-grain : Pure fruiting body extracts are generally higher in beta-glucans and free of starch/alpha-glucans. Mycelium grown on grain is often diluted (sometimes dramatically) unless the brand is transparent and quantifies actives. Extraction method : Hot-water extraction pulls beta-glucans/polysaccharides. Alcohol extraction pulls the terpenes (hericenones/erinacines). Dual extracts capture more of the spectrum. Alcohol-free products (like yours) miss the alcohol-soluble fraction. Verification : Look for third-party testing that reports beta-glucan % (ideally ≥2...

Are there billionaires today supporting the NO vote in Kansas

Yes. Two clear connections to billionaires appear in the contribution list: Lynn Schusterman (Tulsa, Oklahoma) — $1,000,000 She is a confirmed billionaire. Forbes lists “Lynn Schusterman & family” with a real-time net worth of approximately $4.4 billion as of mid-July 2026. Bloomberg has carried higher estimates in the past. She is a major progressive philanthropist through the Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation. Open Society Policy Center (New York) — $400,000 This is the 501(c)(4) lobbying/political arm of the Open Society Foundations network founded and long funded by George Soros , one of the world’s best-known billionaires. (His son Alex Soros has taken a more public leadership role in recent years, but the organization remains the vehicle of the Soros family’s political and philanthropic spending.) No other individuals on the list are known billionaires. The remaining large donors are either organizations (ACLU entities, Planned Parenthood entities, Nat...

The NO's - Following the Money: Kansas United for Impartial Courts Files $7.6 Million Report Opposing Election of Supreme Court Justices

On July 20, 2026, Kansas United for Impartial Courts (KUIC), based at PO Box 3021 in Lawrence, Kansas 66046, filed its Receipts and Expenditures Report with the Kansas Public Disclosure Commission for activity promoting or opposing a Kansas constitutional ballot question. The report covers calendar year 2026 activity and was received by the Commission on July 22, 2026. It was signed by Micah Kubic. This is no small-dollar grassroots effort. The numbers are large, concentrated, and heavily tilted toward national progressive organizations, major trial-lawyer firms, and a handful of high-dollar individual and foundation donors. The group is the lead opposition force against the Kansas Elections for Supreme Court Justices Amendment that will appear on the August 4, 2026, primary ballot. The Ballot Question and the Stakes The amendment, placed on the ballot by the 2025 Legislature via SCR 1611, would change how Kansas selects its Supreme Court justices. Currently, Kansas uses a merit-se...

All figures come from the official Kansas Public Disclosure Commission filing. These are reported contributions supporting one side of a contested constitutional ballot question.

Image
1. In-Kind Contributions (~$260,516 total — fully detailed in the provided Schedule B) Key observation : In-kind support is heavily concentrated in reproductive-rights groups, with ACLU entities as the clear secondary source. kansasvaluesinstitute.org 2. Overall Contributions (Cash + In-Kind, ~$7.64 million) Public summaries of the full Schedule A and contemporaneous reporting show a similar progressive/advocacy tilt at much larger scale, with these major categories: National and state progressive nonprofits / advocacy groups (largest category by far): Multiple large gifts from ACLU entities (national and Kansas affiliates — hundreds of thousands to over $1 million combined in various reports), Planned Parenthood Action Fund and Planned Parenthood Great Plains Votes (hundreds of thousands combined), Open Society Policy Center (Soros-linked, reported at $400,000), National Education Association (NEA, reported at $250,000), and related foundations (e.g., Health Forward Foundation). Kans...

Vote

Image
Henry McClure   785.383.9994 sent from mobile 📱 time kills deals

Dollar General Trip Generation: A Data-Driven Assessment for Neighborhood Traffic Planning

Image
When evaluating the traffic impacts of a typical Dollar General store, the most reliable starting point is the company’s own operating performance rather than generalized assumptions. In fiscal 2025, Dollar General generated approximately $42.7 billion in net sales across a store base of roughly 20,900 locations. This equates to an average of about $2.05 million in annual sales per store. The average transaction, or ticket size, at Dollar General has historically fallen in the range of $18 to $20. Independent analyses of shopper behavior have placed the figure near $19.99 in earlier years, while more recent industry observations of the broader dollar channel remain clustered around $19 to $20. Using a midpoint of $19.50 produces a straightforward calculation: $2.05 million in annual sales divided by $19.50 yields roughly 105,100 customer transactions per year at an average store. Converted to a daily basis, this represents approximately 288 customer visits each day, or a practical work...

The core problem: Since 1960, Topeka’s land area grew about 65% while population grew only about 7%. The city has become less dense and more expensive to serve.

City of Topeka Land Use and Growth Management Plan (2014 video from the City of Topeka) This short promotional video explains Topeka’s updated Land Use and Growth Management Plan, an element of the city’s comprehensive plan. It promotes a shift toward fiscally responsible, sustainable “smart growth” instead of continued low-density sprawl. Key Points The core problem : Since 1960, Topeka’s land area grew about 65% while population grew only about 7%. The city has become less dense and more expensive to serve. Population has leaked to unincorporated Shawnee County (the city’s share of county population has declined, while the population outside the city has more than doubled). Only 2 out of every 10 new county residents have moved into the city, compared with Lawrence, where 8 out of 10 stayed in the city. Keeping Topeka’s historic share of county growth could have meant roughly 23,000 more residents and several million dollars more in annual revenue. Three-tier growth framework :...