Colonel sanders

KFC is switching its U.S. beverage supplier from PepsiCo to Coca-Cola as a core pillar of its new "Kentucky Fried Comeback" strategy. The decision, announced on October 15, 2026, ends a historic 40-year exclusive partnership in the United States that dates back to when PepsiCo originally acquired KFC in 1986. [1] (https://www.nrn.com/quick-service/kfc-u-s-switches-from-pepsi-to-coke), [2] (https://tradersunion.com/news/companies/show/3835217-kfc-switches-coca-cola-2027/), [3] (https://www.centraloregondaily.com/news/consumer/kfc-picks-coca-cola-as-us-soda-supplier-ditches-longtime-partner-pepsico/article_f5ca90f3-bab9-5284-a20f-7007536c088e.html)

The transition will begin in January 2027, with Coca-Cola products expected to completely replace Pepsi across all 3,718 U.S. locations by spring 2027. [1] (https://www.aol.com/articles/kfc-sign-coca-cola-beverage-192804000.html), [2] (https://www.nrn.com/quick-service/kfc-u-s-switches-from-pepsi-to-coke)

KFC decided to make this massive shift for several strategic reasons:

1. Reversing Market Share Loss

KFC U.S. has experienced years of market share erosion, losing ground to fast-growing fried chicken rivals like Chick-fil-A and Popeyes. Under the leadership of U.S. President Catherine Tan-Gillespie, the company is implementing a total brand turnaround plan. Rebranding their beverage fountain is seen as an effective way to inject new energy into a brand that leadership described as "loved but latent". [1] (https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/15/kfc-coca-cola-pepsi-switch.html), [2] (https://www.nrn.com/quick-service/kfc-u-s-switches-from-pepsi-to-coke)

2. Beverage Customization and Menu Innovation

Fast-food beverages are no longer just standard sodas; they have become a major driver of customer traffic through "dirty sodas," specialized refreshers, and premium pairings. KFC is leaning heavily into this trend—recently testing iced coffees, boba, and milkshakes at its corporate innovation restaurant in McKinney, Texas. Coca-Cola is actively partnering with the chain to leverage its vast portfolio and technical capabilities to co-create exclusive, innovative beverage options that align with modern consumer tastes. [1] (https://www.tradingview.com/news/seekingalpha:7b09ac7a7094b:0-former-pepsico-property-kfc-is-switching-to-coca-cola-products-in-the-u-s/), [2] (https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/15/kfc-coca-cola-pepsi-switch.html), [3] (https://www.nrn.com/quick-service/kfc-u-s-switches-from-pepsi-to-coke)

3. Maximizing Customer Traffic and Occasions

By aligning with The Coca-Cola Company, KFC hopes to expand its appeal across multiple dining occasions, such as afternoon snack blocks or premium family meal pairings. Coca-Cola's deep consumer brand loyalty is expected to improve fountain economics and increase the average order check value. [1] (https://www.tradingview.com/news/tradingview:34932fc04bf31:0-kfc-corporation-to-shift-u-s-beverage-partner-to-coca-cola-in-2027/), [2] (https://ca.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/kfc-us-switches-beverage-partnership-to-cocacola-93CH-4883728), [3] (https://www.tradingview.com/news/seekingalpha:7b09ac7a7094b:0-former-pepsico-property-kfc-is-switching-to-coca-cola-products-in-the-u-s/)

What remains unchanged?

While this is a major loss for PepsiCo, the beverage giant isn't completely out of the picture with KFC's parent company, Yum! Brands: [1] (https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/15/kfc-coca-cola-pepsi-switch.html), [2] (https://www.nrn.com/quick-service/kfc-u-s-switches-from-pepsi-to-coke)

• International Markets: PepsiCo will remain the exclusive beverage provider for KFC restaurants in international markets, which represent the largest and fastest-growing portion of KFC's business.

• Taco Bell: PepsiCo recently signed a renewed, 10-year exclusive agreement to remain the beverage provider for Taco Bell. [1] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-10-15/kfc-s-us-locations-to-replace-pepsico-beverages-with-coca-cola), [2] (https://www.wsj.com/business/kfc-is-moving-to-ditch-pepsi-for-coke-in-thousands-of-restaurants-cb44611d), [3] (https://www.centraloregondaily.com/news/consumer/kfc-picks-coca-cola-as-us-soda-supplier-ditches-longtime-partner-pepsico/article_f5ca90f3-bab9-5284-a20f-7007536c088e.html)

Are you curious about which specific Coca-Cola products will be coming to the menu, or would you like to know more about how this impacts the broader Coke vs. Pepsi "cola wars" in the fast-food industry?

Henry McClure

785.383.9994 

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android

Grok

Elon Musk (https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=%2Fm%2F03nzf1&q=Elon+Musk) floated the idea of starting a competitor to Amazon after learning that the e-commerce giant is blocking Grok AI bots from placing orders and handling returns on its platform. [1] (https://x.com/i/trending/2110095957782044959), [2] (https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/business/elon-musk-now-wants-an-amazon-rival-to-challenge-jeff-bezos-empire-heres-why/articleshow/134969759.cms)

On October 15, 2026, an X user complained that Amazon had cut off their automated Grok shopping agents from completing transactions. In response, Musk posted, “Maybe we should start a competitor to Amazon,” sparking widespread speculation about a potential "X Shop" marketplace. [1] (https://americanbazaaronline.com/2026/10/15/elon-musk-amazon-competitor-ecommerce-490125/), [2] (https://247wallst.com/cards/amzn-xpost-01m4ztgs5mg832rbfet0st5ne7), [3] (https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/elon-musk-amazon-rival-x-shop-ai-shopping-agent-restrictions-3018209-2026-10-15), [4] (https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/business/elon-musk-now-wants-an-amazon-rival-to-challenge-jeff-bezos-empire-heres-why/articleshow/134969759.cms)

What Happened with the Grok AI Bots?

The dispute highlights a growing industry flashpoint between tech companies deploying autonomous AI agents and traditional online retailers: [1] (https://americanbazaaronline.com/2026/10/15/elon-musk-amazon-competitor-ecommerce-490125/)

• The Block: X users noticed that Amazon began systematically blocking Grok AI bots from placing orders, executing product price comparisons, and processing returns. [1] (https://americanbazaaronline.com/2026/10/15/elon-musk-amazon-competitor-ecommerce-490125/), [2] (https://x.com/i/trending/2110095957782044959)

• Amazon's Rationale: Retailers like Amazon cite concerns over third-party applications accessing their platforms without explicit authorization, scrapers draining bandwidth, and the security of customer credentials handled by AI agents. Amazon is not alone in this stance; they have also blocked Meta's Muse AI shopping assistant. [1] (https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/musk-floats-amazon-rival-as-ai-shopping-battle-comes-into-focus-4952059), [2] (https://americanbazaaronline.com/2026/10/15/elon-musk-amazon-competitor-ecommerce-490125/)

• The AI Agent Objective: Grok bots are being designed as "overachieving agentic systems" capable of searching out the best deals and executing purchases on behalf of users so they never have to visit individual retail sites. [1] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLMfjUIG8Fk), [2] (https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/musk-floats-amazon-rival-as-ai-shopping-battle-comes-into-focus-4952059)

Why Musk is Considering a Competitor

If AI shopping assistants are blocked at the point of purchase by major retailers, the AI platforms lose their primary transaction value. Musk's motivation to build a rival stems from a mix of convenience and platform ecosystem defense: [1] (https://247wallst.com/cards/amzn-xpost-01m4ztgs5mg832rbfet0st5ne7)

• Capturing Transaction Volume: By building an alternative marketplace (potentially built into X), Musk could seamlessly connect Grok users with independent merchants, creating an environment where AI agents can discover, compare, and complete purchases entirely in-house. [1] (https://americanbazaaronline.com/2026/10/15/elon-musk-amazon-competitor-ecommerce-490125/), [2] (https://247wallst.com/cards/amzn-xpost-01m4ztgs5mg832rbfet0st5ne7)

• Bypassing Restrictive Ecosystems: Musk pointed out that Grok bots can shop directly from sites like Lego without issue. He noted that SpaceX's AI infrastructure could back the platform and even cover automated purchase mistakes. [1] (https://x.com/i/trending/2110095957782044959)

• The Bezos Rivalry: A retail move directly challenges Jeff Bezos' e-commerce empire, matching the duo's ongoing corporate battles in aerospace (SpaceX vs. Blue Origin). [1] (https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/business/elon-musk-now-wants-an-amazon-rival-to-challenge-jeff-bezos-empire-heres-why/articleshow/134969759.cms)

While Musk hasn't confirmed concrete infrastructure plans like warehouses or delivery networks, the move highlights a structural shift where tech firms want AI agents to shop freely, while legacy storefronts demand total control over their traffic. [1] (https://americanbazaaronline.com/2026/10/15/elon-musk-amazon-competitor-ecommerce-490125/)

Would you like to know more about how AI shopping agents operate, or should we look into the security concerns e-commerce platforms have regarding third-party bots?

Henry McClure

785.383.9994 

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android

Ditch check

**Build it across the slope (to intercept runoff), and keep the ditch itself as straight as practical with a consistent downhill grade.**

### Straight Across vs. Angled

- **Straight across the slope** (roughly perpendicular to the direction of water flow) is the usual recommendation for a diversion or interceptor ditch. It catches sheet flow or runoff coming down the hill before it concentrates, erodes soil, or reaches a problem area (building pad, road, low spot, etc.). Agricultural and engineering guides commonly place field or interceptor ditches across the slope this way.

- **Angling it** (e.g., 30–60° from perpendicular) can help in some cases—especially on roads or longer slopes—so water is guided toward a good outlet while still intercepting flow. A slight angle is fine if it improves the outlet path, but don’t make sharp turns.

- The ditch channel itself should run **as straight as topography allows**. Sharp bends or zig-zags create turbulence, slow flow, and cause bank erosion. Gentle curves that follow the land or property lines are okay; abrupt ones are not.

### Key Design Points

- **Grade (longitudinal slope) is more important than the exact angle.** Aim for a consistent positive grade so water keeps moving. Typical targets for an open grassed ditch or swale are roughly 0.5–2% (sometimes up to 3–4% with good protection). Too flat and it ponds; too steep and it erodes. Calculate the total drop needed and set it with a string line, laser level, or equivalent rather than eyeballing it.

- **Cross-section**: Make the sides angled (commonly 2:1 to 3:1 or flatter) for stability and easier maintenance. Avoid steep, near-vertical banks that can slough. A broad, shallow trapezoidal or parabolic shape is usually better than a narrow V for residential or light-use sites.

- **Outlet**: Water has to go somewhere safe. Discharge to a stable vegetated area, existing drainage feature, or properly designed structure. Don’t just dump it onto a neighbor’s property or create a new problem downstream. Kansas (and most places) generally expects you not to increase runoff or change drainage patterns in a way that harms others.

- **Stabilization**: Seed and mulch (or use erosion control blankets) on gentler slopes. Use rock, riprap, or check dams where grades are steeper or flows are higher. In slide-prone or high-flow areas, lining may be needed.

- **Practical steps**: Call 811 before digging. Check local permits or ordinances (especially if this is part of a development, grading, or near public drainage). Survey the existing slope and natural flow paths first so the ditch works with the land instead of fighting it.

**Bottom line**: Intercept by running the ditch across the slope, give it a steady downhill grade to a good outlet, keep the channel relatively straight, and protect the sides and bottom against erosion. For anything beyond a simple residential swale—especially on a development site or with significant drainage area—get a surveyor or engineer involved so the grade, capacity, and outlet are right.

Henry McClure

785.383.9994 

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android

Fords money

Yes, Henry Ford had an auto-manufacturing subsidiary in Germany before World War II and before Adolf Hitler came to power. [1, 2] 

## Key Timeline and Details

* Early Operations (1925): Ford first established a commercial presence in Germany in 1925, initially operating an assembly plant in Berlin. [1, 2] 

* Cologne Plant Construction (1929–1931):

* Following General Motors' acquisition of Opel in 1929, Henry Ford decided to build a large-scale manufacturing plant in Cologne, Germany.

   * Henry Ford and Cologne Mayor Konrad Adenauer laid the foundation stone on October 2, 1930.

   * The Berlin assembly operations closed in April 1931, and the first vehicle rolled off the new Cologne production line on May 4, 1931 (predating Hitler's appointment as Chancellor in January 1933). [2] 

* Name Change (1939): The German subsidiary eventually became known as Ford-Werke AG in 1939, shortly before the outbreak of World War II. [1] 

[1] [https://www.adl.org](https://www.adl.org/resources/news/ford-motor-company-and-third-reich)

[2] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Germany)

Henry McClure

785.383.9994 

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android

Please review

Press Release= Sen. Marshall 

 

Growing list of 606 Kansas Pastors & Faith Leaders Denounce Adam Hamilton

Wichita – Wichita – A growing list of 606 Kansas Pastors and faith leaders have signed an open letter addressed to Rev. Adam Hamilton, calling on him to repent of his teachings on salvation, Scripture, marriage, and abortion. Call him to withdraw from the U.S. Senate race.

Hamilton has come under fire for sermons calling people to repent for eating beef, repent driving too much, repent for their “whiteness”, and claiming that Kansas is doomed because it’s “too beige” and not diverse enough.

List and link to sermons on realadamhamilton.

An Open Letter

To the Rev. Adam Hamilton

729 signatures

Dear Pastor Hamilton,

I pastor a church in Wichita. We have never met, and I do not write these words lightly. I address you publicly on the matters below because you have taught them publicly, and because you are now asking Kansans, including the people of my congregation, to hand you their vote for a Senate seat.

I do not write only for myself. There are other ministers in Kansas who hold these same convictions. Pastors and leaders who have weighed these issues according to Scripture and arrived where I have arrived are welcome to stand here with me by signing below.

Pastor Hamilton, I am asking you, as a baptized brother in Christ, to repent of what you have taught and to withdraw from the Senate race. My reasons come from Scripture. They are the foundation upon which I stand and the authority by which I speak, and I intend to speak to these matters as plainly as you have spoken from your own pulpit.

The gospel of Jesus Christ is the power of God unto salvation. I am not ashamed of the gospel. In January 2022 you preached a sermon titled “Is the Bible True? Is Jesus the Only Way?” You told your people you do not fear that followers of other religions will spend eternity in hell, and that when they arrive in heaven they will recognize Jesus as the one they had been seeking all along. Your campaign says this is inclusivism and not universalism. Fine. I take you at your word that you believe salvation comes through Christ alone. But Paul does not stop where you stop. He binds salvation to faith, and faith to hearing: “Faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ” (Rom. 10:17). A gospel that requires no preacher is not Paul’s gospel. To say that men may be saved by Christ apart from faith in Christ, apart from bowing the knee to His Lordship, apart from believing in the heart and confessing with the mouth, is to deny the gospel outright.

You have taught for years that Holy Scripture contains errors. In your sermon on Mary Magdalene you set Paul against Jesus, as though we were free to choose which of them to follow. Jesus left us no such freedom. “He who hears you hears me” (Luke 10:16). Peter placed Paul’s letters among “the other scriptures” (2 Pet. 3:16). Everything we know of Jesus comes to us through His apostles. When a pastor teaches his people to separate the Jesus parts of the Bible from the Paul parts, he has handed them authority over the Word of God, and they will not return it.

You announced to the press that the Book of Discipline’s language calling homosexual practice incompatible with Christian teaching would be removed, and you celebrated when it was. This is no argument over one difficult verse. God gave us marriage as a picture of Christ and His bride, and Paul says so outright: “This mystery is a profound one, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church” (Eph. 5:32). Bless a union God calls sin, name it marriage, and you have made a mockery of the one thing on earth given to show what the love of Christ for His church looks like. You have also broken with every branch of the church for two thousand years, Wesley among them. I know you want people to hear that they are welcome and loved. So do I. But hear what Paul told the Corinthians: “And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God” (1 Cor. 6:11). That is the welcome. Come and be washed. You have kept the welcome and dropped the washing, and the people it costs most are the very ones you mean to help.

I would ask you to repent of these things even if you were not running for office. What follows is why I am also asking you to withdraw from the Senate race.

Your campaign says you support safe and legal access to abortion, and you have come out against the amendment that would recognize equal rights from conception. You describe this as a moral tension. I see no tension. Scripture counts “hands that shed innocent blood” among the things the Lord hates (Prov. 6:17). David says God knit him together in his mother’s womb (Ps. 139:13). When Mary carried the Lord into Elizabeth’s house, the unborn John leaped for joy (Luke 1:41–44). Our Lord spent nine months in a womb Himself. When a minister of that Lord defends the murder of children before birth, he mocks the way Christ chose to come to us. The church has never wavered here. The Didache, written not long after the apostles, says flatly, “You shall not murder a child by abortion,” and the fathers who took up the question said the same. What you call a tension is a break with the whole church, and a defense of the very thing for which Israel was condemned, the blood of her children (Ps. 106:37–38).

The Senate is not neutral ground. Paul calls the civil ruler “God’s servant for your good,” the one who “does not bear the sword in vain” (Rom. 13:4). The sword is given to guard the innocent. You are asking for it while promising in advance to keep it sheathed over the unborn. You would take an office you have already said you will not use for the purpose God gave it.

Nor is your faith a private matter in this race. Most Kansans know your name because you are a pastor, and much of the trust they give you is trust in that calling. James says “we who teach shall be judged with greater strictness” (Jas. 3:1), and it applies here. You have told your own congregation that men may be saved without hearing of Christ, that Paul may be set aside when he is inconvenient, and you have blessed what God has called sin. A man who teaches such things cannot be trusted to lead. If you will not keep faith with the Word you were ordained to preach, why should Kansas expect you to keep faith with her?

So, as one minister to another and not as a political opponent, I am asking you to repent. Repent of what you have taught concerning salvation, Scripture, marriage, and the unborn. Then step out of this race rather than carry the name of Christ into an office you intend to use to mock God by shielding those who desire the blood of the innocent. Elijah stood on Carmel and asked Israel, “How long will you go limping with two different opinions? If the LORD is God, follow him” (1 Kings 18:21). That is my question to you.

To the ministers and leaders reading this letter alongside Pastor Hamilton: the names below belong to those who have examined these things in the Scriptures and judged them as I have. A shepherd is not at liberty to keep silent while another shepherd leads the sheep somewhere Scripture forbids.

Pastor Hamilton, I know what this would cost you. Repentance always costs something, and it costs more the more people are watching. But the promise holds for pastors as for anyone else: “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just, and will forgive our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9). I am praying for you. My door is open.

In Christ,

Kyle Lammott

Lead Pastor, Exodus Church · Wichita, Kansas

Henry McClure

785.383.9994 

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android