Saturday, September 12, 2026

No respect

Rodney Dangerfield spent decades telling America that he got “no respect.” At 72, after a lifetime of turning rejection and failed relationships into punchlines, he married Joan Child, the Santa Monica florist who had spent ten years seeing the tender man behind the red tie. Their love story began in 1983, when Rodney wandered into her flower shop and delivered an opening line strange enough to sound like one of his routines.

Joan recognized him immediately. She had first watched him on television as a teenager, and now the comedian she remembered from “The Tonight Show” was standing at her counter. Rodney asked what kind of drugs she liked. Joan, raised in a conservative Utah Mormon family, innocently answered, “Antibiotics, I guess.” Rodney was charmed. He kept coming back, often while she arranged flowers, until those visits became something both of them expected.

Years later, Joan remembered the first sight of him with extraordinary warmth. “For me, it was love at first sight, the holy grail of encounters. He was fascinating and had those soulful azure-blue eyes, the color of the sky on a clear day. I couldn’t look at him without smiling.”

Rodney was already famous, but romance did not move quickly. He and Joan dated on and off for about ten years. He was roughly three decades older, lived an unconventional comedian’s life, and had already been through a difficult first marriage. Yet Joan found herself looking forward to his voice on the phone, his visits, and the private humor that existed when there was no audience waiting.

She later explained what the public rarely saw. “Rodney is the most unique individual I’ve ever met in my life. Well, obviously the funniest man in the world, but also he has a tender side. He’s intelligent. He’s so fun to be around.” That mattered because the stage character was built around rejection. At home with Joan, the joke no longer had to be true.

On December 26, 1993, they turned ten years of courtship into marriage almost impulsively. Rodney and Joan went to Las Vegas, found a wedding chapel, and married. He was 72. The comedian who had spent years making wives, loneliness, and romantic failure part of his act had entered a different chapter when most people would have assumed his personal life was already settled.

Marriage did not make Rodney stop joking about wives. Joan became his favorite test audience. He continued writing material and trying lines on her, including jokes about her cooking and married life. Joan laughed anyway. She understood that humor was not merely his profession. It was how he moved through depression, aging, and memories of a childhood in which affection had often been missing.

Their home life could be wonderfully odd. Rodney kept late comedian’s hours, sometimes staying awake until four or five in the morning. Joan handled many of his affairs and stayed close as his health became more fragile. When he underwent brain surgery in 2003, she was frightened but remained beside him. On television that year, Joan joked that she sometimes needed an even older husband because keeping up with Rodney was difficult.

By 2004, serious heart problems changed everything. Rodney underwent heart valve replacement surgery in August, then suffered a small stroke and developed infections and abdominal complications. He fell into a coma. Joan stayed near him through the uncertainty, the woman who had once watched him enter a flower shop now watching for the smallest sign that he was still there.

Near the end, Rodney emerged from the coma. Joan later said, “When Rodney emerged, he kissed me, squeezed my hand and smiled for his doctors.” He died on October 5, 2004, at 82, after nearly eleven years of marriage and more than two decades after that first flower-shop meeting.

The man who got no respect finally found someone who never stopped showing it.

Henry McClure
785.383.9994 

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android
Uploaded Image

Karma

A guest sued after claiming an Airbnb host sent a security-camera image of him with another woman to his wife.

Shawn Mackey rented a home in Memphis, Tennessee, in September 2022 for a weekend with friends.

During the stay, host Pamela Fohler accused him of breaking house rules involving additional guests.

After checking out, Mackey was charged an additional $502.46. He disputed the charge and left an unfavorable review.

According to his lawsuit, Fohler later texted him a security-camera image showing him entering the property with another woman.

She allegedly asked whether she should send the photos to his wife or whether he would.

Days later, Mackey claimed his wife received the image at her work email from an unfamiliar account.

He alleged the incident damaged his marriage and caused emotional distress.

Fohler denied creating the email account or sending the image to his wife.

Mackey sued Fohler and Airbnb in federal court in 2023.

What started as a dispute over guests and rental fees eventually became a lawsuit involving privacy, alleged extortion and a marriage.

Credit: Mississippi District Court

#fblifestyle #airbnb #airbnbhost #securitycamera #privacylaw

Henry McClure
785.383.9994 

Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
Get Outlook for Android
Uploaded Image

Friday, September 11, 2026

Subject: You exploded over a hot dog. The banquet checks did not even raise your pulse.

Commissioner Cook:
You are a lawyer. You are an officer of the court. You sit on JEDO with a vote. That is not a hobby. That is a higher duty than the rest of the room, and you have spent years reminding people that you know the rules better than they do.
So let’s talk about the rule you applied to me.
You came at me personally over a hot dog. Electioneering, you said. A frank in a bun. Mustard. Onions. You treated that like I had stuffed the ballot box. Fine. You set the temperature. Live at that temperature.
Now apply it.
On May 6, 2024, Molly Howey sent me GO Topeka’s own list of “grants/contributions/sponsorships/scholarships” for 2022 and 2023. I published it. The line includes church dinners, ministry retreats, Juneteenth festivals, an NAACP Freedom Fund banquet, YWCA awards tables, Peace and Justice sponsorships, and a $10,000 night called For the Culture KS. The civic/banquet/church/festival slice that no honest person can call a factory is $93,235. The whole drawer Howey dumped those checks into totaled $861,750, because the banquet was hidden behind Choose Topeka, PTAC, Forge, and pitch prizes so JEDO would never have to say the word charity.
You are the lawyer on the board. You know K.S.A. 12-187 et seq. The purpose goes on the ballot. Special-purpose sales tax stays inside that purpose. Kansas AG Opinion 2001-014: sales-tax money may fund economic development if the electorate approved that use — not if a contractor later decides a church dinner “feels like vitality.” AG Opinion 2017-015 is your county’s own half-cent. Spending follows the ballot and the interlocal. The GO Topeka contract is tighter than both: no grant-fund spending except as specified in the annual budget JEDO approves.
A banquet table is not payroll. A ministry retreat is not a plant. A Freedom Fund banquet is not a widening of the tax base. If you can find the electioneering statute in a hot dog, you can find the purpose clause in a $2,500 banquet check. Do not tell me the statute is too hard. You have already demonstrated you can get theological about condiments.
Officer of the court means you do not sit mute while a contractor spends voter-pledged money as a customer-loyalty program. Recipients of those checks do not bite the hand. That is the point. Public money in. Political goodwill out. You are supposed to be the person in the room who says that out loud, louder than you said it to me over a frank.
I want three things from you in writing, as counsel and as a JEDO vote:
  1. Yes or no: is an NAACP banquet, a church dinner, or a YWCA awards table economic development payable from the half-cent tax?
  2. Will you demand GO Topeka split true deal incentives from contributions/sponsorships so the banquet never hides behind Choose Topeka again?
  3. Will you use the same voice on those expenditures that you used on me about the hot dog — or was the outrage only available when the target was Henry McClure?
If a hot dog is a hanging offense, a banquet paid with other people’s sales tax is a board failure. You do not get to be the smartest lawyer in the room only when it is convenient. Read Howey’s list. Read the statute. Then get as loud as you already proved you can get.
Henry McClure
3625 SW 29th Street #100
Topeka, KS 66614
785-383-9994
mcre13@gmail.com

Uploaded Image Uploaded Image Uploaded Image

Subject: Sales-tax charity is not economic development — JEDO should stop pretending it is

Commissioner Cook
Councilmember Hiller
You both vote on JEDO. One of you is my county commissioner. One of you is my city councilmember. That is why this is going to both of you and not into another staff graveyard.
On May 6, 2024, Molly Howey sent me GO Topeka’s own list of what they booked as “grants/contributions/sponsorships/scholarships” for 2022 and 2023. I published it. It is still sitting there. Read it as JEDO voting members, not as guests at their podium.
What they called economic development included Juneteenth celebrations, church dinners and back-to-school events, an NAACP banquet, YWCA banquets and scholarships, peace-and-justice sponsorships, Alvin Ailey camp, a Brown Foundation anniversary, “For the Culture KS,” Mana De Topeka, New Mount Zion, Bring Back the Blvd, Oakland Garden, Living the Dream, Women of Excellence, Kansas Chamber conference tickets, Discovery Center kindergarten, and pitch-contest prize checks dressed up as development.
That is not a jobs program. That is a patronage list.
The half-cent sales tax is taken from people buying groceries, parts, and pizza. JEDO’s deal with GO Topeka is supposed to buy economic development: payroll, investment, sites, deals that widen the tax base. It is not a municipal United Way with a government credit card.
Kansas law does not give you the cover you think it does.
Local retailers’ sales tax is authorized by K.S.A. 12-187 et seq. Voters must approve it. The purpose goes on the ballot. KDOR’s own rule is simple: general-purpose local sales tax may be used for any lawful purpose; special-purpose sales tax may be used only for the purposes stated to the voters. JEDO’s levy was not sold as a charity pot. It was sold as economic development.
Kansas Attorney General Opinion 2001-014 says a city or county may use sales-tax proceeds for economic development if the electorate approved that use. It also says public funds must serve the public welfare, and courts defer to the governing body on that finding. That is the loophole GO Topeka lives in: call a banquet “vitality,” call a church dinner “talent,” and hope JEDO never asks the next question. The AG did not say banquet tickets are economic development. The AG said you have to own the finding. You two now own it.
Attorney General Opinion 2017-015 is even closer to home. It concerned Shawnee County’s earlier half-cent. The AG tied spending to the ballot list and the interlocal agreement. Excess after those purposes were met could fall to general funds. That opinion is not a license to bury civic donations inside an annual contractor lump and call the lump “ED.” Howey’s list is not leftover money after a bridge was built. It is the program.
Kansas is stingy the other direction. Most charities still pay sales tax on what they buy unless a specific exemption applies. 501(c)(3) status is not an automatic sales-tax holiday. So the state will tax a nonprofit when it buys tables and linens, then JEDO lets a contractor use other people’s sales tax to buy that same nonprofit a sponsorship. Tax the charity on the way in. Baptize the donation as “development” on the way out. That is not law. That is a racket with letterhead.
The contract is tighter than the statute. GO Topeka is not supposed to spend grant funds except as specified in the annual budget JEDO approves. If sponsorships were stuffed into a line called grants/contributions/sponsorships/scholarships, you did not approve economic development. You approved a black box.
And love is the point. Nobody who cashes a $2,500 or $10,000 “sponsorship” walks away thinking GO Topeka is a problem. They walk away thinking GO Topeka is generous. That is how you build a cheering section. That is how you get rooms that clap when the quarterly slideshow comes on. That is how you get people who will defend the machine that just wrote them a check — including the candidates that machine prefers. You do not need a smoke-filled room. The transaction is the mechanism. Public money in. Political goodwill out. Recipients do not bite the hand that funds their banquet.
If those groups are worthy, they can raise private money. If GO Topeka’s private board wants to pass the hat among its own directors, fine. What they may not do is launder a sales tax into charity and then brief JEDO as if Juneteenth catering and banquet tables are the same species as a plant expansion.
Wednesday night they spent an hour on $20,000 gymnastics equipment and a moving company’s TV ads and called it rigor. Then the public had four minutes to talk about land bought with that same tax, sitting under a data-center play, with GO Topeka holding the paper. You both sat there as voting members. You now own the contradiction.
I want three things from each of you, in writing, as my elected officials and as JEDO votes:
  1. A plain statement whether you consider banquet sponsorships, church events, and cultural celebrations to be economic development payable from the half-cent tax. Yes or no. Not a paragraph about “community vitality.”
  2. A demand that GO Topeka separate, forever, true deal incentives from contributions/sponsorships — and that JEDO stop approving a lump that lets them hide the second inside the first.
  3. An answer on who authorized using tax-bought land and tax-funded goodwill as if they were GO Topeka’s private inventory.
Government has no moral license to tax a cashier in Topeka so a development contractor can buy affection. Kansas sales-tax law requires a purpose. The ballot stated one. The contract requires a budget. Banquet tables are not that purpose. If JEDO will not say so out loud, it is not an oversight board. It is an applause track.
I expect a reply from both of you. Not a forward to staff.
Henry McClure
3625 SW 29th Street #100
Topeka, KS 66614
785-383-9994
mcre13@gmail.com

Uploaded Image Uploaded Image

Subject: Sales-tax charity is not economic development — JEDO should stop pretending it is

Commissioner Cook

Councilmember Hiller

You both vote on JEDO. One of you is my county commissioner. One of you is my city councilmember. That is why this is going to both of you and not into another staff graveyard.

On May 6, 2024, Molly Howey sent me GO Topeka’s own list of what they booked as “grants/contributions/sponsorships/scholarships” for 2022 and 2023. I published it. It is still sitting there. Read it as JEDO voting members, not as guests at their podium.

What they called economic development included Juneteenth celebrations, church dinners and back-to-school events, an NAACP banquet, YWCA banquets and scholarships, peace-and-justice sponsorships, Alvin Ailey camp, a Brown Foundation anniversary, “For the Culture KS,” Mana De Topeka, New Mount Zion, Bring Back the Blvd, Oakland Garden, Living the Dream, Women of Excellence, Kansas Chamber conference tickets, Discovery Center kindergarten, and pitch-contest prize checks dressed up as development.

That is not a jobs program. That is a patronage list.

The half-cent sales tax is taken from people buying groceries, parts, and pizza. JEDO’s deal with GO Topeka is supposed to buy economic development: payroll, investment, sites, deals that widen the tax base. It is not a municipal United Way with a government credit card.

Kansas law does not give you the cover you think it does.

Local retailers’ sales tax is authorized by K.S.A. 12-187 et seq. Voters must approve it. The purpose goes on the ballot. KDOR’s own rule is simple: general-purpose local sales tax may be used for any lawful purpose; special-purpose sales tax may be used only for the purposes stated to the voters. JEDO’s levy was not sold as a charity pot. It was sold as economic development.

Kansas Attorney General Opinion 2001-014 says a city or county may use sales-tax proceeds for economic development if the electorate approved that use. It also says public funds must serve the public welfare, and courts defer to the governing body on that finding. That is the loophole GO Topeka lives in: call a banquet “vitality,” call a church dinner “talent,” and hope JEDO never asks the next question. The AG did not say banquet tickets are economic development. The AG said you have to own the finding. You two now own it.

Attorney General Opinion 2017-015 is even closer to home. It concerned Shawnee County’s earlier half-cent. The AG tied spending to the ballot list and the interlocal agreement. Excess after those purposes were met could fall to general funds. That opinion is not a license to bury civic donations inside an annual contractor lump and call the lump “ED.” Howey’s list is not leftover money after a bridge was built. It is the program.

Kansas is stingy the other direction. Most charities still pay sales tax on what they buy unless a specific exemption applies. 501(c)(3) status is not an automatic sales-tax holiday. So the state will tax a nonprofit when it buys tables and linens, then JEDO lets a contractor use other people’s sales tax to buy that same nonprofit a sponsorship. Tax the charity on the way in. Baptize the donation as “development” on the way out. That is not law. That is a racket with letterhead.

The contract is tighter than the statute. GO Topeka is not supposed to spend grant funds except as specified in the annual budget JEDO approves. If sponsorships were stuffed into a line called grants/contributions/sponsorships/scholarships, you did not approve economic development. You approved a black box.

And love is the point. Nobody who cashes a $2,500 or $10,000 “sponsorship” walks away thinking GO Topeka is a problem. They walk away thinking GO Topeka is generous. That is how you build a cheering section. That is how you get rooms that clap when the quarterly slideshow comes on. That is how you get people who will defend the machine that just wrote them a check — including the candidates that machine prefers. You do not need a smoke-filled room. The transaction is the mechanism. Public money in. Political goodwill out. Recipients do not bite the hand that funds their banquet.

If those groups are worthy, they can raise private money. If GO Topeka’s private board wants to pass the hat among its own directors, fine. What they may not do is launder a sales tax into charity and then brief JEDO as if Juneteenth catering and banquet tables are the same species as a plant expansion.

Wednesday night they spent an hour on $20,000 gymnastics equipment and a moving company’s TV ads and called it rigor. Then the public had four minutes to talk about land bought with that same tax, sitting under a data-center play, with GO Topeka holding the paper. You both sat there as voting members. You now own the contradiction.

I want three things from each of you, in writing, as my elected officials and as JEDO votes:

  1. A plain statement whether you consider banquet sponsorships, church events, and cultural celebrations to be economic development payable from the half-cent tax. Yes or no. Not a paragraph about “community vitality.”
  2. A demand that GO Topeka separate, forever, true deal incentives from contributions/sponsorships — and that JEDO stop approving a lump that lets them hide the second inside the first.
  3. An answer on who authorized using tax-bought land and tax-funded goodwill as if they were GO Topeka’s private inventory.

Government has no moral license to tax a cashier in Topeka so a development contractor can buy affection. Kansas sales-tax law requires a purpose. The ballot stated one. The contract requires a budget. Banquet tables are not that purpose. If JEDO will not say so out loud, it is not an oversight board. It is an applause track.

I expect a reply from both of you. Not a forward to staff.

Henry McClure
3625 SW 29th Street #100
Topeka, KS 66614
785-383-9994
mcre13@gmail.com