**I apologize for the omission in my initial summary.**
Project Otis came up **only briefly during the public comment portion** of the meeting (near the end, around the 1 hour 13–14 minute mark), not during the main Parks & Recreation Master Plan presentation. My summary focused on the primary agenda item (the detailed Parks update), which took up the bulk of the ~1 hour 48 minutes of relevant discussion. Public comments are typically shorter and secondary in work sessions unless they directly tie into the main topic.
### What was said about Project Otis:
A member of the public (identified in other sources as likely Henry McClure, based on context from prior meetings) spoke during public comment. He referenced an Attorney General's opinion regarding the allocation and accounting of funds from **liquor-by-the-drink collections** (approximately **$2.1 million** annually flowing to Shawnee County). He argued these funds are not being used as originally intended under "Project Otis" and urged the commission to "help Otis out" and support the project. He also briefly mentioned a personal mixed-use development idea involving pickleball that he discussed with others, emphasizing it should stand on its own without public money.
The commissioners thanked him, asked if anyone else wished to speak (none did), and then moved on to administrative items, communications, and executive session. No discussion or action followed on Project Otis during this meeting.
Project Otis appears to be a recurring local issue/advocacy topic related to the use of specific county revenue streams (liquor taxes), which has been raised in prior commission meetings as well. It wasn't connected to the Parks Master Plan in this session.
If you'd like me to expand the full summary to include more on public comments or dive deeper into Project Otis background, just let me know!
