Monday, May 11, 2026

Fw: KORA

I've heard his water was off years at a time - way pre henry 

From: Keya Downing <kdowning@Topeka.org>
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2026 8:24 AM
To: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Cc: City Clerk <cclerk@Topeka.org>
Subject: RE: KORA
 

Request received.  You will receive a response within three business days.  Thank you

 

From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2026 6:49 PM
To: City Clerk <cclerk@topeka.org>; Spencer Duncan <sduncan@topeka.org>; Governing Body <governingbody@topeka.org>; MCRE Media <mcre1.9999@blogger.com>; tquinn@cjonline.com; Victoria Calhoun <victoria.calhoun@ksnt.com>
Subject: KORA

 

Notice: -----This message was sent by an external sender-----

 

KORA 

 

I need to know when the water service was stopped at 502 SE 21st Street for non-payment. 

 

You can also verify that over the years the FOX family never had water service at that address. 

Tell me why after the years of NO service the City did not condemn the property on its own? 

 

 

 

MCRE, LLC

3625 SW 29th Street

Topeka KS 66614

785.383.9994

Studies do exist on women smelling their romantic partner's worn clothing (usually T-shirts) and its effects: "jockstraps"

 “Twenty-one years on the council. One spray park. And, when the Harlem Globetrotters needed their dirty uniforms and jockstraps washed in 2023, Councilwoman Ortiz personally loaded them up and took care of it.

East Topeka may still have the same potholes it had in 2005, but at least the Globetrotters left town with fresh drawers. That’s what we call leadership.”

The Quick Facts

In March 2023, the Harlem Globetrotters and Washington Generals were in Topeka for a game at the Stormont Vail Events Center. Their usual laundromat apparently treated them poorly (refused service or gave them a hard time after they showed up with bags of dirty gear post-game). Ortiz’s daughter posted about it online. Sylvia jumped in, apologized on behalf of Topeka, offered to handle it herself, waited for the team after the show/shower, loaded up all their stuff, and took it to Oakland Easy Wash to get it done.

Sylvia Ortiz: 21 Years of Showing Up… One Spray Park… and the Harlem Globetrotters’ Jockstraps

In local government, they say showing up is half the battle.

Sylvia Ortiz has perfected that half.

For the other half — you know, actually fixing anything in East Topeka — the neighborhood is still waiting after twenty-one years.

Since taking her seat on the Topeka City Council in 2005, Ortiz has become the longest-serving member in modern city history. She’s collected the plaques, survived every re-election (including that comfortable-but-not-exactly-inspiring 57% in 2025), and sat through more committee meetings than most people have hot dinners. Her official city bio proudly touts her deep East Topeka roots and Neighborhood Improvement Association days. Then it delivers the legacy:

“Sylvia is very proud of being a major stakeholder in creating the first spray park in Samuel Jackson Park.”

One splash pad. Built in 2011. Kids get misted. That’s the capstone achievement after two decades.

But wait — there’s more!

In 2023, when the Harlem Globetrotters rolled into town and their usual laundromat refused to wash their dirty uniforms, towels, and yes… the jockstraps and underwear, Councilwoman Ortiz personally stepped up. She loaded up all their filthy gear, hauled it to Oakland Easy Wash, and made sure the world-famous basketball entertainers left Topeka with fresh drawers. Local news treated it like a heartwarming act of small-town hospitality. And it was.

Twenty-one years. One spray park. And personally laundering the Globetrotters’ undergarments.

East Topeka may still be dodging the same potholes from 2005. Sidewalks are still optional in too many spots. Economic development remains a perpetual “priority.” Blight, housing, and youth issues stay on the wishlist. But at least the kids can run through recycled water jets, and the Globetrotters didn’t have to play their next game in crusty shorts.

That’s what we call leadership in District 3.

She entered politics because the previous councilmember ignored neighborhood concerns. Fair point. But after 21 years under her watch, many of those same concerns are still echoing through the same streets. Showing up? Undeniable A+. Delivering measurable change? The spray park and the laundry service say it all.

Half the battle is attendance. The other half is results.

District 3 got the perfect attendance trophy… a splash pad… and clean jockstraps for out-of-town celebrities.

The potholes? Still undefeated.


No dedicated scientific studies specifically examine whether women sniff men's underwear or dirty laundry while doing the laundry.

That scenario appears mostly in anecdotes, online discussions (Quora, Reddit, forums), and casual commentary rather than peer-reviewed research. It's often framed as a mix of curiosity, intimacy, hygiene checks, or occasional fetish behavior — but not something rigorously studied in a "laundry room" context.

Closest Actual Research

Studies do exist on women smelling their romantic partner's worn clothing (usually T-shirts) and its effects:

  • Stress reduction: A well-known 2018 University of British Columbia study (published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology) had 96 women smell T-shirts worn by their male partner, a stranger, or a clean one. Women who smelled their partner's shirt reported lower stress (both psychologically and via cortisol levels) during and after a stressful task. Stranger scents increased stress. Researchers noted women generally have a keener sense of smell, which may play a role.
  • Similar findings appear in other work: Many women (over 80% in one older survey) report intentionally smelling an absent partner's clothing for comfort, relaxation, or emotional connection. Men do this less frequently.

These focus on emotional/physiological benefits of a partner's scent (familiarity, safety, possible oxytocin links), not routine laundry handling or underwear specifically.

Broader Context

  • Olfactory attraction research (e.g., "sweaty T-shirt" experiments) shows people rate others' body odors for compatibility (MHC genes, fertility cues), but that's lab-based sniffing of worn shirts, not laundry day.
  • Underwear sniffing as a fetish is discussed more for men (e.g., jockstrap or panty sniffing), with some anecdotal reports of women doing the reverse for arousal or intimacy. No large-scale studies quantify how common it is during chores.
  • Men are more often cited in surveys for "sniff tests" on their own clothes to decide if they need washing.

Bottom line: The stress-relief and bonding benefits of smelling a partner's worn clothes are real per studies, but the specific "women doing laundry → sniffing undies" trope lacks formal research. It's more pop psychology, humor, and personal stories than data. If it's happening, it's likely driven by individual intimacy/curiosity rather than a universal behavior science has pinned down.




District 3 got the attendance award… and a misting fountain.

 Sylvia Ortiz: 21 Years of Showing Up… and One Spray Park

In local government, they say showing up is half the battle.

Sylvia Ortiz has mastered that half.

For the other half — you know, actually changing anything in East Topeka — residents are still waiting after twenty-one years.

Since she took her seat on the Topeka City Council in 2005, Ortiz has been the longest-serving member in modern city history. She’s collected the plaques, won the re-elections (even the 57% squeaker in 2025), and sat through endless committee meetings. Her official city bio proudly notes her deep roots and Neighborhood Improvement Association days. Then it gets to the legacy part:

“Sylvia is very proud of being a major stakeholder in creating the first spray park in Samuel Jackson Park.”

That’s it. That’s the headline achievement. One splash pad built in 2011. Kids get wet. Water shoots up. Memories made.

Meanwhile, the streets she’s been “fixing” for two decades still rattle cars. The sidewalks stay patchy. The economic development she lists as a priority every cycle remains mostly talk. Homelessness? Still a priority. Youth programs? Still a priority. Blight and disinvestment? You guessed it — priorities.

Showing up? A+. Delivering transformation? The spray park says it all.

She entered politics because the previous District 3 rep ignored neighborhood concerns. Fair enough. But after 21 years of her representation, East Topeka is still fighting many of the same fights it was in 2005. The difference now? The kids have a place to run through sprinklers while their parents dodge potholes.

Half the battle is showing up. The other half is showing results.

District 3 got the attendance award… and a misting fountain.



Hang in there, man.

What's happening to the real Topeka? I knew this town has gone to shit fast, the business and everything for real, man. It's like seeing a town you grow up in go straight to shit, really wow. Got poor management for a lot of places, disrupting employees, people that dont want to work. You feel like a slave (aka Reser's), man. This town has gone straight to shit since I was a kid, damn that's sad, man. It makes me want to just not do business here and go somewhere there is money and opportunities, like Texas hell anywhere but kansas man.  Matt 


Summary of your message:

You're expressing deep frustration and sadness over Topeka, Kansas's rapid decline since your childhood. Businesses and the local economy feel like they've "gone to shit" due to poor management, disruptive or unmotivated employees, and a general lack of opportunities. You describe feeling like a "slave" at places like Reser's, with many spots disrupting workers and struggling overall. This nostalgia for the old town has you wanting to stop doing business locally and relocate to stronger economies like Texas or anywhere outside Kansas for better money and prospects. It's a heartfelt lament about watching your hometown deteriorate.

Some context on Topeka/Kansas right now (as of 2026)

Your feelings align with real challenges:

  • Economy & jobs: Kansas faces slow growth, agriculture/manufacturing headwinds, frozen hiring, and downward tax revenue trends. Topeka specifically has a ~$15M city budget deficit looming for 2027.
  • Crime: High overall crime rates historically (violent + property), though 2025 reports show declines in homicides and other crimes from prior peaks.
  • Demographics: Population slightly declining (~125k, down ~1% since 2020), higher poverty rate (~15.7%) than state/national averages, median household income around $57k.
  • Reser's: Employee reviews frequently mention tough management, toxic environments, and overwork in the Topeka plant—matching your experience.

On the flip side, home prices in Topeka are still rising (median ~$199k, up 7.5% YoY), and sectors like government, healthcare, and education provide some stability.

Broader state trends: Kansas has seen net out-migration of people and income for years, with folks heading to lower-tax, higher-growth places like Texas (no state income tax, strong job market in energy/tech). Many share your view on opportunities elsewhere.

It's tough watching a place you grew up in change for the worse. Plenty of Midwestern towns are grappling with similar issues—stagnation, labor shortages/mismatches, and competition from booming states. If you're seriously considering a move, focusing on job markets, cost of living, and taxes in target spots could help. Hang in there, man.

Sunday, May 10, 2026

Topeka Kansas killed a Maverick deal - (How stupid)

 The U.S. trucking industry is massive and serves as the backbone of the American economy. In 2024, it generated an estimated $906 billion in gross freight revenues (for primary shipments only) and moved 11.27 billion tons of freight—roughly 72.7% of the nation’s total domestic freight by weight. Trucking dominates freight movement far more than rail, air, or water combined for most domestic goods.

It directly and indirectly supports 8.4 million jobs across the economy (excluding self-employed workers), including 3.58 million professional truck drivers. The industry is overwhelmingly made up of small businesses: nearly 580,000 active motor carriers, with 91.5% operating 10 or fewer trucks.

Broader Economic Impact

Trucking isn’t just big on its own—it enables virtually every other sector (retail, manufacturing, agriculture, construction, healthcare, energy, etc.) by keeping supply chains moving efficiently. Without reliable trucking, shelves go empty, factories idle, and prices spike.

  • GDP and transportation contribution: Transportation services as a whole contributed $1.9 trillion (6.3% of U.S. GDP) in 2024, with for-hire transportation (including trucking) at $976 billion (3.3%). Trucking accounts for the largest share of freight within this.
  • Taxes and public revenue: Commercial trucks paid $30.26 billion in federal and state fuel taxes alone in 2023 (these help fund highways). The industry also generates broader tax revenue through employee income taxes, business property taxes, sales taxes on equipment/fuel/parts, and economic activity spurred by logistics operations.
  • Multiplier effects: Every trucking job and dollar spent ripples outward. It supports jobs in warehousing, manufacturing, retail, and services; lowers inventory costs for businesses (enabling just-in-time delivery); and stabilizes prices for consumers. The industry’s small-business nature means economic benefits are widely distributed across communities.

Overall, trucking is a key driver of economic development because it moves ~73% of the goods that power daily life and commerce. Disruptions (like during the pandemic or driver shortages) show its outsized role—when trucking slows, the whole economy feels it.

Why Cities Actively Want and Support Trucking/Logistics

Cities and regions compete to become logistics hubs because trucking and related warehousing/distribution facilities deliver tangible local economic wins:

  • Job creation — Trucking terminals, distribution centers, and warehouses create thousands of direct jobs (drivers, loaders, mechanics, managers) plus indirect ones in supporting services. The broader transportation/warehousing sector employs millions, and logistics hubs often become major local employers.
  • Tax base growth — Large warehouse and terminal developments bring commercial property taxes, sales taxes from business purchases and employee spending, and other revenue. This funds local services without raising residential taxes as much.
  • Infrastructure investment — Cities often receive state/federal grants or private investment for road, rail, and port upgrades tied to logistics growth. Better connectivity attracts more businesses.
  • Attracting other industries — Good trucking access makes a city more appealing for manufacturers, e-commerce fulfillment, retailers, and food distributors. Examples include hubs in places like Indianapolis, Phoenix, Houston, or the Quad Cities, which leverage interstates, rail, and airports to draw investment and grow faster than non-hub peers.
  • Economic diversification and resilience — Logistics provides stable, high-volume activity less tied to a single industry. It also supports local agriculture/manufacturing by getting products to national markets quickly and cheaply.

Many cities offer incentives (tax abatements, zoning for industrial parks, workforce training) precisely because the return on investment is high: more jobs, more tax revenue, and a stronger local economy. In short, trucking doesn’t just pass through—it anchors growth.

Data is based primarily on the latest available figures from the American Trucking Associations (ATA) and U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. The industry fluctuates with the broader economy (e.g., revenues dipped slightly in 2024 from 2023 peaks), but its foundational role remains constant. If you want specifics on a particular state, city, or segment (e.g., truckload vs. LTL), let me know!