Friday, April 3, 2026

From your standpoint: Topeka isn't unusually aggressive on the base charge compared to peers, but the fixed-heavy model always stings during low-use months (winter, conservation, small household). If your usage stays consistently low, the base will dominate — that's the trade-off for reliable service without massive per-gallon spikes.

 Here's a consumer-focused regional comparison of water base charges (the fixed "readiness-to-serve" or monthly meter fee) for a typical single-family residential customer with a standard 1" meter inside city limits. Your Topeka bill uses $21.94 for the 1" water base charge in 2026.

This fee covers infrastructure costs (pipes, plants, maintenance) regardless of how much water you use — which is why your low 1,699-gallon usage makes the bill feel top-heavy.

Regional Base Charge Comparison (2026 or Latest Available Rates)

Data drawn from city rate schedules, utility reports, and analyses for residential customers. Note: Many cities use 5/8" or 3/4" as the "standard" meter (cheaper base); 1" is common for some homes and slightly higher.

Region / CityBase Charge (1" or Standard Meter)Notes on Structure & "Hinkiness" for Low Users
Topeka, KS (your bill)$21.94High fixed portion (~68% of your $32 water subtotal). Feels expensive at low usage but moderate volume rate ($7.75/1,000 gal single-family).
Wichita, KS~$15–$25 (est. for standard)Generally lower fixed than Topeka; 2026 increases focused more on volume. Low users may feel less "hinky."
Lawrence, KSSimilar to Topeka or slightly lowerTiered volume rates higher; base comparable but overall bill driven more by usage.
Kansas City, MOHigher fixed portion (~$30–$50 combined water+sewer base est.)Wastewater and stormwater add significantly; base feels heavier due to infrastructure mandates.
Other Midwest (e.g., Columbia MO, Springfield MO, Indianapolis area)$12–$25 typicalOften lower-to-moderate bases; some shifting toward more consumption-based to ease low-user burden.
Northeast US$30–$60+ (often higher)Highest regional bases due to old infrastructure repairs; low users pay a lot for "availability."
West US (e.g., CA, OR, WA)$30–$60+ (drought-driven)Very high fixed + tiered penalties for high use; conservation pushes bases up.
South US$15–$35 typicalGenerally more affordable bases; lower overall regional bills.
National Average$20–$40 (standard meter)Varies widely; combined water+sewer fixed often $40–$80+. Topeka sits in the middle.

Key Takeaways from a Consumer Viewpoint:

  • Topeka's $21.94 base is not an outlier — it's right in the typical Midwest range and below many coastal or older Northeast/West cities where aging pipes and regulations drive fixed costs higher.
  • The "hinky" feeling is common nationwide for low-usage households. Most utilities use this two-part system (big base + smaller per-gallon) because infrastructure is expensive to maintain 24/7, even if you use little water. Shifting more to volume charges would punish heavy users (or during droughts) and risk system shortfalls.
  • In Kansas/Midwest, bases have risen steadily (Topeka's went from ~$15–$18 in prior years to $21.94 in 2026 as part of a planned schedule), but remain more moderate than national high-cost areas.
  • Low users like you (under 2,000 gallons) get hit hardest percentage-wise everywhere. Cities with lower bases or more tiered/inclining blocks feel "fairer" to conservative households.

Nationally, average household water bills (including base + usage) run ~$40–$80/month depending on region and usage, with combined water+sewer often $100–$150. Northeast and West lead in higher costs due to infrastructure needs; Midwest and South tend to be lower.

From your standpoint: Topeka isn't unusually aggressive on the base charge compared to peers, but the fixed-heavy model always stings during low-use months (winter, conservation, small household). If your usage stays consistently low, the base will dominate — that's the trade-off for reliable service without massive per-gallon spikes.

Sponsors?

These people want more power for the people

The four members of the Kansas House of Representatives who voted Nay (did not support) on Senate Bill 104 (granting the Shawnee County Board of County Commissioners discretion to create a citizens commission on local government) during its emergency final action on March 19, 2025, were:
  • Rep. Charlotte Esau
  • Rep. Ricky James
  • Rep. Bill Rhiley
  • Rep. Kevin Schwertfeger
The bill passed the House by a vote of 119 Yea to 4 Nay (with 2 absent and not voting). It later received gubernatorial approval and became law.
For full context on the roll call, including all Yea voters and those absent, refer to the official Kansas Legislature vote record.



From: John Alcala <John.Alcala@house.ks.gov>
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2026 11:57 AM
To: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Cc: jalcala3@cox.net <jalcala3@cox.net>; Patrick Schmidt <Patrick.Schmidt@Senate.ks.gov>; Rick66.kloos@gmail.com <Rick66.kloos@gmail.com>; Ty Masterson <Ty.Masterson@senate.ks.gov>; Ken Corbet <Ken.Corbet@house.ks.gov>
Subject: Re: MTAA
 
Don't disagree Henry here's a replied to all if it was up to me I'd dissolve the whole board, make all expenditures and budget go through the city council. I'm not saying that's a better way. At least we would have elected officials that are handling tax dollars with transparency and I'm not saying that would be better but it's better than MTA handling it and creating lawsuits with people's tax dollars.
I wouldn't run a Bill but I sure would cosign on it.

Thank you for your email.

John Alcala
Kansas House of Representatives 
57th District 

On Apr 3, 2026, at 11:09 AM, Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com> wrote:


John and Patrick

Please change the state law so we can elect the board @ MTAA



From: Council Assist <Councilassist@topeka.org>
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2026 8:46 AM
To: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>; Molly Howey <Molly.Howey@topekapartnership.com>; Spencer Duncan <sduncan@topeka.org>; Kevin Cook <kevin.cook@snco.us>; countyclerk@snco.us <countyclerk@snco.us>; City Clerk <cclerk@Topeka.org>; MCRE Media <mcre1.9999@blogger.com>; Governing Body <governingbody@topeka.org>; Karen A. Hiller <khiller@Topeka.org>
Subject: RE: MTAA
 

Good morning Mr. McClure,

Thank you for your message.  This message serves as confirmation that your email has been received by the council members. 

 

Tonya L. Bailey

Sr. Executive Assistant to the City Council

City of Topeka

215 SE 7th St. Rm 211

785-368-3710

 

"The preceding email message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges or that may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not listed as a recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful."

 

 

 

 

 

From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2026 4:31 PM
To: Molly Howey <molly.howey@topekapartnership.com>; Spencer Duncan <sduncan@topeka.org>; Kevin Cook <kevin.cook@snco.us>; countyclerk@snco.us; City Clerk <cclerk@topeka.org>; MCRE Media <mcre1.9999@blogger.com>; Governing Body <governingbody@topeka.org>; Karen A. Hiller <khiller@topeka.org>
Subject: MTAA

 

Notice: -----This message was sent by an external sender-----

 

Molly as leading NGO

 

What are you thoughts on MTAA

 

 

This is Topeka (thisistopeka.com) is a small, independent local online news and community platform run as This Is Topeka, LLC, based right in Topeka, Kansas

It's not a big media company or formal political group—just a handful of local writers and contributors putting out daily articles on local news, crime, arts/entertainment, food, events, sports, history, and a lot of satire. They launched around late 2024 (they had a launch party), and it seems designed to fill a gap in hyper-local coverage with a casual, opinionated voice that the bigger papers might not have.
Who runs it / key people
The main figure is Jeffery W. Fogg II (often credited as Jeff Fogg or This Is Topeka Staff). He's the one most tied to the site—writer, storyteller, and apparently the registered agent for the LLC. Background: He grew up or spent time in Colorado (B.A. in Religious Studies from University of Colorado, with a thesis on rural religious movements), then came to Topeka for his J.D. at Washburn University School of Law. He's now a local resident focused on narrative journalism, research, and "uncovering compelling narratives" about the human experience and community issues. The LLC is registered at an address in Topeka (1428 SW Washburn Ave.).
Other regular contributors (all local Topekans or Kansas-based):
  • Mack Callahan (most prolific on the "Police Beat" and satire): Writes the snarky "Catch and Release" series on arrests, repeat offenders, and the justice system—often with a tone criticizing lenient policies or "bad decisions." He's described elsewhere as a retired political reporter; no big public bio, but his email and posts are tied directly to the site.
  • Bob Cutler: Handles music/live scene stuff; he also runs the related Dystopeka.com (edgier, watchdog-style local commentary that powers some of the site's music content).
  • Others like Lila Marquez (arts, food, news), Andrew Evans (reviews), and occasional pieces from Kansas News Service or Kansas Reflector (statewide public-affairs reporting). Some "staff" bylines for breaking news. One former contributor, Tevyn Harmon, announced a mayoral run on the site.
No giant "team" page or corporate staff list—it's a shoestring, contributor-driven blog/LLC.
Mission / goals / what they do
From their own About page:
"We are dedicated to shining a light on the vibrancy, creativity, and spirit of our city. Our mission is to celebrate the best of Topeka by connecting our community with events, local news, fresh places to eat, and new experiences that make Topeka a great place to live, work, and explore. We believe in fostering a sense of pride and community by highlighting the diversity of our city... Let's continue to build a positive, inclusive space where the pulse of our city comes alive for all to enjoy!"
In practice, they do straightforward local coverage plus heavy doses of:
  • Crime/police beat with sarcastic headlines (e.g., "CATCH AND RELEASE: STAB A WOMAN — DOOR NEVER STAYS CLOSED").
  • Food guides, book/film reviews, music venue spotlights, event calendars, sports, and history pieces.
  • Some political/news roundups (including reprints) and satire that pokes at local and national figures.
They push subscriptions to "stay informed" and run sponsored content. It's not investigative deep dives or a nonprofit—more like a lively, unfiltered community blog/newsletter for people who live in Topeka and want the daily pulse (good, bad, and ridiculous).
Political vibe / "liberal Democrats always backbiting"?
You're not wrong that the tone can feel opinionated and critical ("backbiting"). The About page leans into "inclusive," "diversity," and positive community pride language, and they reprint from outlets like Kansas Reflector (generally seen as center-left/public media). Satire sometimes targets Republican figures (e.g., an April Fools piece on Rubio). At the same time, the heavy "Catch and Release" crime coverage is often blunt about repeat offenders and the justice system in a way that sounds frustrated with leniency—not exactly classic liberal framing. It's a mixed bag: progressive-leaning on diversity/culture stuff, watchdog/critical on local crime and governance. No evidence they're a formal Democratic outfit or activist group—just locals with strong opinions running a scrappy independent site. That mix probably comes off as "backbiting" depending on what side of a local issue you're on.
Bottom line: They're Topeka locals (mostly), running a small, recent online hub for news + snark because they like telling stories about their city. Not a grand political mission—just "here's what's happening in Topeka, with our take on it." If you've been following their crime or political posts, the sarcastic edge is intentional and part of the brand.


MTAA

Mr. Williams 

You are always telling me the City should be fire and police

Spencer

Take your City Manager off Go Topeka and make him work for the City. 

If MTAA loses any more money Eric Johnson can take Braxton's place.



From: John Alcala <John.Alcala@house.ks.gov>
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2026 11:57 AM
To: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Cc: jalcala3@cox.net <jalcala3@cox.net>; Patrick Schmidt <Patrick.Schmidt@Senate.ks.gov>; Rick66.kloos@gmail.com <Rick66.kloos@gmail.com>; Ty Masterson <Ty.Masterson@senate.ks.gov>; Ken Corbet <Ken.Corbet@house.ks.gov>
Subject: Re: MTAA
 
Don't disagree Henry here's a replied to all if it was up to me I'd dissolve the whole board, make all expenditures and budget go through the city council. I'm not saying that's a better way. At least we would have elected officials that are handling tax dollars with transparency and I'm not saying that would be better but it's better than MTA handling it and creating lawsuits with people's tax dollars.
I wouldn't run a Bill but I sure would cosign on it.

Thank you for your email.

John Alcala
Kansas House of Representatives 
57th District 

On Apr 3, 2026, at 11:09 AM, Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com> wrote:


John and Patrick

Please change the state law so we can elect the board @ MTAA



From: Council Assist <Councilassist@topeka.org>
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2026 8:46 AM
To: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>; Molly Howey <Molly.Howey@topekapartnership.com>; Spencer Duncan <sduncan@topeka.org>; Kevin Cook <kevin.cook@snco.us>; countyclerk@snco.us <countyclerk@snco.us>; City Clerk <cclerk@Topeka.org>; MCRE Media <mcre1.9999@blogger.com>; Governing Body <governingbody@topeka.org>; Karen A. Hiller <khiller@Topeka.org>
Subject: RE: MTAA
 

Good morning Mr. McClure,

Thank you for your message.  This message serves as confirmation that your email has been received by the council members. 

 

Tonya L. Bailey

Sr. Executive Assistant to the City Council

City of Topeka

215 SE 7th St. Rm 211

785-368-3710

 

"The preceding email message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges or that may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not listed as a recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful."

 

 

 

 

 

From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2026 4:31 PM
To: Molly Howey <molly.howey@topekapartnership.com>; Spencer Duncan <sduncan@topeka.org>; Kevin Cook <kevin.cook@snco.us>; countyclerk@snco.us; City Clerk <cclerk@topeka.org>; MCRE Media <mcre1.9999@blogger.com>; Governing Body <governingbody@topeka.org>; Karen A. Hiller <khiller@topeka.org>
Subject: MTAA

 

Notice: -----This message was sent by an external sender-----

 

Molly as leading NGO

 

What are you thoughts on MTAA

 

 

Shawnee County Case No. 2019-CV-000816 -List the chronological order of this case. I want to know everything from beginning to end, how it started, when it started, anything that you can tell me about the chronological order of this case.

**The full chronological details (docket or "register of actions") for Shawnee County District Court Case No. 2019-CV-000816 are available through the official Kansas state court public records portal.**


This is a **civil (CV) case** filed in 2019 in the Third Judicial District Court (Shawnee County, Kansas), which covers Topeka and the surrounding area. Shawnee County civil records from 2004 onward are digitized and publicly accessible online (or via public terminals at the courthouse).


### How to view the complete chronological order

1. Go to the official **Kansas Courts Case Search** portal: [https://casesearch.kscourts.gov/](https://casesearch.kscourts.gov/).

2. Search by **case number** (enter exactly “2019-CV-000816” or the format accepted by the system).

3. The docket will show the full timeline: every filing, motion, order, hearing, notice, attorney appearance, and disposition in date order from the very first document through the end of the case (or current status if still active).


**Note**: Some users report needing a free account (name, email, phone, security questions) for full access; basic case information is often viewable publicly. If documents themselves are needed beyond the docket summary, you may need to request copies from the Shawnee County District Court Clerk’s Office (200 SE 7th Street, Topeka, KS 66603; 785-251-4350 or 785-251-4270).


### What the docket typically includes (general structure for any 2019-CV case)

- **Filing date** (when the case officially started — almost certainly sometime in 2019, based on the case number).

- **Parties** (plaintiff(s)/petitioner(s) vs. defendant(s)/respondent(s)) and their attorneys.

- **Initial filing** (e.g., Petition/Complaint).

- Subsequent events in strict chronological order: summons/ service of process, answers, motions (e.g., for summary judgment, discovery, TRO/injunction if applicable), hearings, orders, judgments, appeals (if any), satisfaction of judgment, or dismissal/closure.

- Any post-judgment activity.


No publicly indexed news articles, appellate decisions, or third-party legal databases (such as Trellis) contain details or the docket for *this specific Shawnee County case*. It does not appear to be a high-profile matter that generated media coverage or public discussion.


### Other ways to access the records

- **In person**: Visit the Shawnee County District Court Clerk’s Office or use the public access computer terminals in the courthouse (200 SE 7th Street, Topeka).

- **By phone/mail**: Contact the Clerk’s Office with the case number for docket information or copies (fees may apply for copies).


If you already have access or can share any additional details (such as party names), I can try to cross-reference for any publicly available secondary sources, but the official Kansas Case Search is the authoritative and most complete source for the full end-to-end chronology. Let me know if you need help navigating the portal or interpreting typical docket entries!