Saturday, March 7, 2026

B & W

Bartlett & West is a prominent **employee-owned engineering firm** headquartered in **Topeka, Kansas**. Founded in 1951 by Charlie West and Harry "Bus" Bartlett as a small, entrepreneurial partnership, the company began with land development projects, including contributions to the Kansas Turnpike. Over the decades, it has grown steadily into a nationally recognized multi-disciplinary leader, celebrating its **75th anniversary** in 2026.

Today, Bartlett & West employs more than **475 employee-owners** and operates offices across the Midwest and beyond. As a 100% employee-owned company (ESOP), it emphasizes a client-focused culture, community involvement, and innovative solutions. The firm has earned accolades such as repeated rankings among the nation's **Top 500 Design Firms** by Engineering News-Record (ENR)—most recently for an 18th consecutive year—and recognition as one of the best places to work.

Specializing in building **stronger, smarter, more connected infrastructure**, Bartlett & West offers a wide range of services, including:

- Civil and structural engineering
- Transportation (roads, highways, rail)
- Water supply, wastewater, and stormwater management
- Energy and renewable energy solutions (including biogas)
- Site development, landscape architecture
- Surveying, construction management, and GIS
- Strategic planning and asset management

The firm's work supports communities and industries nationwide, from rural water systems to transmission lines and industrial parks. With a commitment to sustainability, technology integration, and giving back through volunteerism and philanthropy, Bartlett & West continues to lead communities toward a better tomorrow.

(Word count: 248)

Watch "#motivation #changeyour #youtubeshorts #dothingsyoudontwanttodo #habitsthatchangeyourlife #relations" on YouTube

https://youtube.com/shorts/DSU1VmD-v-8?si=QRVgLPp7xgZEksKU



Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

Friday, March 6, 2026

Public records show others, like you (Henry McClure), have referenced his work in KORA requests for his past inquiries into GO Topeka board meetings.

Joseph Ledbetter: Background and Profile
Joseph Robert Ledbetter (commonly known as Joe Ledbetter) is a licensed attorney in Topeka, Kansas, with over 15 years of experience. He operates Ledbetter Law Office at 1734 SW Van Buren St., Topeka, KS 66612, specializing in areas like lobbying, legal research, budget analysis, and assisting neighborhood associations in navigating bureaucratic challenges. His practice emphasizes helping underserved communities "fight red tape to get things done." He is also involved in political and civic activism, including founding or leading Citizens for Accountability in Government (CAG) in Topeka, a group focused on promoting transparency and accountability in local government. Ledbetter has a history of pro se litigation, including a 2003 federal civil rights lawsuit against the City of Topeka (Ledbetter v. City of Topeka, 318 F.3d 1183), where he alleged Fourth Amendment violations related to an arrest warrant and search; the case was dismissed on summary judgment, but it highlighted his willingness to challenge city officials.
Ledbetter is known locally as a vocal critic of Topeka's government, often using the Kansas Open Records Act (KORA, K.S.A. 45-215 et seq.) to request documents and expose perceived inefficiencies or lack of transparency. Examples include a 2012 KORA request revealing inconsistencies in city billing practices, which triggered a review, and multiple requests to the city for contracts and financial details. His activism extends to public comments at city council and county meetings, where he has advocated for better governance, such as suggesting a "readiness to serve" charge for utilities. Despite his critical stance, Ledbetter has transitioned into consulting roles with the entities he once challenged, including paid work for the City of Topeka and lobbying for the Greater Topeka Partnership (GTP).
Ledbetter's Challenges to Go Topeka and JEDO on KORA and Transparency
Ledbetter has repeatedly "put Go Topeka to the test" on open records and transparency, particularly regarding its use of public funds from the Joint Economic Development Organization (JEDO), which allocates about $5 million annually in sales tax revenue to Go Topeka for economic incentives. Go Topeka, as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit under the GTP, is not automatically subject to KORA like public bodies, but Ledbetter has argued that its receipt of substantial tax dollars should make its expenditures and records accessible under the act, citing precedents where "quasi-governmental" entities or those handling public functions must comply. He has described "battles" to obtain information, including denials of requests for salaries (e.g., GO Topeka President Doug Kinsinger's compensation), bonuses, board minutes, and details on fund transfers (e.g., $811,000 to the Chamber of Commerce not reflected in budgets).
Key Instances and Timeline
  • 2010: In a letter to the editor, Ledbetter questioned whether GO Topeka's records were subject to KORA, referencing a conversation with Shawnee County Commissioner Ted Ensley who confirmed they were. He criticized potential secrecy around economic development deals, arguing public funds demand openness.
  • 2011: During a JEDO meeting discussing GO Topeka transparency, the board adjourned without hearing public comments from Ledbetter and others, prompting criticism of the process.
  • 2014 (Major Push): At the May 14 JEDO board meeting, Ledbetter provided extensive public comment on the RFP and contract renewal for GO Topeka's economic development services. He argued the RFP stated expenditures would be subject to KORA, but the proposed contract omitted this, potentially leading to costly court fights. He cited AG opinions, including one on Finney County economic development funds (where significant public money to private orgs triggers KORA) and another on nonprofits. Ledbetter proposed specific contract language: "This grant/contract is subject to Kansas Open Records Act, and all records of expenditures of this money shall be deposited with the City of Topeka Clerk every 30 days." He criticized GO Topeka's lack of responsiveness to his requests and emphasized transparency for public money, land purchases, and incentives (e.g., questioning a deal with Yantra Services). Despite support from Councilman John Campos II for adding KORA language, the board approved the contract without it after debate clarifying JEDO's oversight but not full public access. Ledbetter vowed to continue advocating and provided the AG opinion for the record.
  • 2015: Ledbetter spoke at a March 25 JEDO meeting under public comment, highlighting a "disconnect" between small businesses and GO Topeka, questioning millions invested in projects amid transparency issues. He also addressed JEDO on selecting a consultant in April.
  • 2017: At a March 29 JEDO meeting, he supported extending GO Topeka's contract but requested to review it before the vote, continuing his push for scrutiny.
No direct court cases were found where Ledbetter sued GO Topeka specifically over KORA, but his efforts align with AG opinions he cited, such as those on economic development orgs (e.g., AG Opin. on Finney County: public funds to private entities can be subject if they perform governmental functions or are under significant control). Outcomes have been mixed: While he hasn't forced GO Topeka to become fully subject to KORA, his advocacy contributed to discussions on transparency, and JEDO meetings became more public (e.g., televised). However, GO Topeka remains a nonprofit with limited automatic KORA obligations, relying on JEDO budget oversight instead.
Evolution from Critic to Insider
By 2022, Ledbetter's role shifted. Described as Topeka's "biggest critic," he was hired by then-GTP CEO Matt Pivarnik (despite backlash) to join the team, praising the organization's turnaround. He consulted for the City of Topeka on utility rates, KDOT talks, housing incentives, and economic development, earning $49,500 in 2022-2023 and more in subsequent contracts. As of 2025, he lobbies for GTP but faced a notification for failure to file required ethics forms. This transition has been noted positively in local media, with Ledbetter stating Topeka has "turned the corner" under new leadership.
Connections to Your Query and Broader Context
Your interest aligns with Ledbetter's history of KORA challenges to GO Topeka, which mirrors concerns about transparency in nonprofits handling tax dollars. Public records show others, like you (Henry McClure), have referenced his work in KORA requests for his past inquiries into GO Topeka board meetings. No recent (post-2017) direct challenges from Ledbetter to GO Topeka on KORA were found, possibly due to his consulting role. For the latest, consider filing a KORA request to JEDO or the AG's office for any unresolved complaints, or check CAG Topeka's YouTube for videos of his speeches. If "Quora" refers to the Q&A site rather than a typo for KORA, no connections were found—Ledbetter has no visible presence there.


File a KORA Request: Submit to Go Topeka/Greater Topeka Partnership for minutes, agendas, financials. If denied, appeal to AG (ag.ks.gov/file-a-complaint/koma-kora-violations).

Applicability of Kansas Open Meetings Act (KOMA) and Kansas Open Records Act (KORA) to Nonprofits Like Go Topeka
Go Topeka, as the economic development division of the Greater Topeka Partnership (a 501(c)(3) nonprofit), receives public funds through mechanisms like the Joint Economic Development Organization (JEDO), which allocates sales tax revenue (approximately $5 million annually in recent years for economic incentives and projects). This raises questions about whether it qualifies as a "public body" or "quasi-governmental entity" subject to KOMA (K.S.A. 75-4317 et seq., requiring open meetings) and KORA (K.S.A. 45-215 et seq., requiring open records). Kansas law does not automatically reclassify a 501(c)(3) as a government organization based solely on public funding or board composition, but certain factors can trigger applicability.
Key Legal Tests for Nonprofits Becoming Subject to KOMA/KORA
Kansas courts and the Attorney General's Office use a multi-factor analysis to determine if a nonprofit is a "public agency" (for KORA) or "public body" (for KOMA). These acts apply to entities that:
  1. Receive or expend public funds (e.g., tax dollars).
  2. Are subject to control by a governmental unit (e.g., through board appointments, oversight, or statutory creation).
  3. Act as a governmental agency by performing public functions (e.g., economic development traditionally handled by government) or have independent authority to make governmental decisions.
  • Public Funds Alone Are Insufficient: Mere receipt of tax dollars (even substantial amounts) does not trigger KOMA/KORA if the entity is otherwise private. For example, vendors or service providers paid with public funds are exempt.
  • Quasi-Governmental Status: A nonprofit becomes "quasi-governmental" when it effectively acts as an extension of government. This is fact-specific and often requires a court or AG opinion. Subordinate groups (e.g., committees created by public bodies) are explicitly covered if a majority discusses business.
  • Application to Go Topeka: Based on available governance documents and AG precedents, Go Topeka likely does not fully meet the threshold for automatic KOMA/KORA coverage. It operates independently as a nonprofit, with a mix of private and ex officio public members (e.g., mayor, county commissioner). However, its role in administering public incentives and having government officials on the board could argue for coverage under the "control" and "governmental function" prongs. No specific court ruling or AG opinion directly addresses Go Topeka, but similar entities (e.g., chambers of commerce or economic development commissions) have been deemed not subject. If meetings are closed and minutes unpublished, this could violate KOMA if deemed applicable, but transparency can still be demanded via KORA requests for records (e.g., board agendas, financials).
Relevant Legal Precedents
  • Memorial Hospital Ass'n v. Knutson, 239 Kan. 663 (1986): A nonprofit hospital leasing county facilities and receiving public mill levy funds (~$228,000/year) was not subject to KOMA. The court emphasized limited government control and no independent decision-making authority, despite public funding. This precedent suggests entities like Go Topeka—receiving funds but operating autonomously—may avoid coverage.
  • State v. Great Plains of Kiowa County, Inc., 294 Kan. 220 (2012): A nonprofit hospital was an "instrumentality" under KORA due to its creation by voter initiative and role in fulfilling public healthcare needs. The court focused on the entity's purpose as an extension of government will, making records accessible. This could apply if Go Topeka is seen as fulfilling a core government function (economic development).
  • Kansas One-Call Sys., Inc. v. State, 294 Kan. 220 (2012): Mere receipt of public funds was insufficient to subject a nonprofit utility locator to KOMA. The entity lacked government control.
  • AG Opinions (Non-Binding but Influential):
    • Opin. 87-143: A nonprofit economic development org (Three Rivers, Inc.) was subject to KOMA due to public funding, government creation, and service provision.
    • Opin. 94-42: K-10 Corridor Development, Inc. (economic dev) was not subject, as it was privately formed with limited control.
    • Opin. 99-64: Prairie Village Economic Development Commission not subject, despite public ties.
No direct precedents label such setups as "corrupt," but lack of transparency can lead to AG investigations or lawsuits if KOMA/KORA applies.
Conflicts of Interest for Elected Officials on Nonprofit Boards
Kansas law allows elected officials to serve on nonprofit boards (e.g., as ex officio members on Go Topeka), but requires disclosure and recusal in certain cases to avoid conflicts.
Key Laws
  • Kansas Governmental Ethics Commission (K.S.A. 46-215 et seq.): Oversees conflicts for state/local officials. Officials must file Statements of Substantial Interests (SSI) annually, disclosing interests exceeding 5% or $5,000 in businesses/nonprofits.
  • K.S.A. 46-233: Prohibits officials from having a substantial interest in contracts funded by laws they helped pass. Disclosure is required; voting may be barred if interest is direct.
  • K.S.A. 75-4304 (Local Conflicts): Local officials must disclose interests in contracts/decisions. No outright ban on board service, but recusal if conflict arises (e.g., real estate agent voting on incentives benefiting their clients).
  • Recent Developments: Senate Bill 66 (2025) proposes banning local officials from voting on development projects with "substantial interest" (e.g., financial gain), highlighting ongoing concerns.
Precedents and AG Opinions
  • AG Opin. 2005-17: A county commissioner could serve on a nonprofit science center board, as long as interests are disclosed and no direct contract benefit.
  • AG Opin. 2001-25: City council member on 501(c)(3) board could vote on city contracts with the org, absent substantial interest.
  • Sedgwick County Case (2021): Commissioners failed to disclose nonprofit board ties, violating SSI laws, leading to fines/scrutiny.
  • No specific Go Topeka conflicts found in public records, but the presence of a real estate agent (e.g., representing developers) could trigger recusal if board actions benefit their business.
Violations can result in civil penalties ($500+), ouster, or invalidation of actions.
Legal Ramifications and Enforcement
  • If KOMA Applies: Closed meetings/no minutes could lead to AG investigations, court orders for openness, fines up to $500 per violation, or action invalidation.
  • If KORA Applies: Nonprofits receiving $350+ in public funds must disclose expenditures (K.S.A. 45-240), even if not fully "public."
  • Broader Kansas Transparency Issues: No major Go Topeka controversies found, but state-wide critiques (e.g., ACLU calling Kansas "secretive") highlight similar setups.
Steps to Demand Transparency or Point Out Conflicts
  1. File a KORA Request: Submit to Go Topeka/Greater Topeka Partnership for minutes, agendas, financials. If denied, appeal to AG (ag.ks.gov/file-a-complaint/koma-kora-violations).
  2. Complain to AG or DA: For suspected KOMA violations or undisclosed conflicts.
  3. Ethics Complaint: To Governmental Ethics Commission (ethics.ks.gov) for SSI non-disclosure.
  4. Public Advocacy: Share findings with voters via media/op-eds; petition for audits or referendums on funding.
  5. Litigation: If evidence of violations, sue in district court to enforce KOMA/KORA (e.g., seeking records or open meetings).
For the latest, consult the AG's office or a Kansas attorney specializing in open government law. Board compositions and policies can change; verify via topekapartnership.com or direct contact.


Fw: NOTICE-Public Health & Safety Committee Meeting: March 11, 2026 @ 1:00pm



From: City of Topeka, Kansas <no-reply@topeka.org>
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2026 4:31 PM
To: mcre13@gmail.com <mcre13@gmail.com>
Subject: NOTICE-Public Health & Safety Committee Meeting: March 11, 2026 @ 1:00pm

City of Topeka E-Notify

You are receiving this because you asked to be notified when City of Topeka shares City Council Committee related information.

A Public Health & Safety Committee meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, March 11, 2026, at 1:00pm. The meeting will be held in the 1st Floor Conference Room at City Hall (215 SE 7th St). A virtual attendance option is also available. 
If you would like to attend virtually, please contact the Council office by 1:00pm on 3/10 to obtain the virtual log-in information. The meeting will be live streamed on the City of Topeka's Facebook and City4 Communications platforms as well.

Agenda will be posted to the City Council webpage closer to the meeting date.

Additional City Council information including the meeting agenda is located at Welcome to Topeka, KS

Privacy is important to us.  Subscriber information will not be shared with anyone.  Subscribers only receive the information requested.


 
City of Topeka on Twitter
City of Topeka on Facebook
Website
Copyright © 2026 City of Topeka, Kansas, All rights reserved.
You subscribed to one or more e-Subscription lists asking to receive news and updates.

Our mailing address is:
City of Topeka, Kansas
215 SE 7th Street
City Hall Building
Topeka, KS 66603


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp