Friday, January 16, 2026

Retard

Yes, **articles of impeachment have been filed** against Minnesota Governor Tim Walz in the state House as of mid-January 2026. This stems from Republican lawmakers, led by Rep. Mike Wiener (R-Long Prairie), who introduced a resolution on or around January 12-14, 2026, containing **four articles** accusing Walz of "corrupt conduct in office" and violating his constitutional oath.

The charges center on allegations that Walz:
- Knowingly concealed or permitted widespread fraud in state-administered programs (e.g., child care assistance, welfare, and other social services), despite warnings, audits, and reports.
- Interfered with oversight, investigations, and corrective actions by state agencies.
- Prioritized political considerations over proper administration and accountability.
- Failed to faithfully execute laws protecting public funds, allowing safeguards to be ignored and billions in taxpayer money to be lost.

The fraud in question involves estimates of up to **$9 billion** in federal and state funds potentially stolen since around 2018, particularly in programs like child care assistance and food/nutrition initiatives (e.g., cases tied to the Feeding Our Future scandal and others). Much of the scrutiny has focused on schemes allegedly involving fake or unqualified providers, with some reports highlighting involvement from parts of Minnesota's Somali community, though the issue is broader.

This development follows Walz's announcement on January 5, 2026, that he would **not seek reelection** in 2026, amid mounting pressure from the scandal, federal investigations, congressional hearings (including calls for him to testify), and criticism from Republicans and even some oversight efforts under the Trump administration.

Key procedural points:
- The Minnesota House (which has a narrow Republican majority or split control) must vote to impeach by a simple majority for the articles to advance.
- If impeached, the state Senate would hold a trial, requiring a **two-thirds vote** to convict and remove Walz from office.
- The legislative session begins February 17, 2026, so any formal vote or trial would likely occur then or later.
- Many sources describe this as a long-shot effort due to partisan divides and the high bar for Senate conviction, with some viewing it as symbolic or politically motivated accountability push.

Walz and his administration have denied wrongdoing, calling the efforts politically driven (including ties to federal "retribution" narratives), and emphasized steps taken like task forces and new anti-fraud laws. Democrats have largely dismissed it as partisan theater.

This is a developing story tied to national debates on government oversight, immigration, and federal program integrity. It's a historic push in Minnesota politics, but removal remains unlikely without bipartisan support. For the latest, check reliable Minnesota outlets like FOX 9, Star Tribune, or official legislative sources. #Minnesota #TimWalz #Impeachment #FraudScandal



Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
on No comments:

Ooooops

Dr. Peter McCullough says what many never realized: mRNA injections didn't originate with Pfizer, Moderna, or Operation Warp Speed, they trace back to U.S. military and DARPA research dating as far back as 2012, a full decade before COVID. 

This wasn't a spontaneous "medical miracle," it was a pre-existing government-backed platform fast-tracked during a global crisis. 

When something is developed under military frameworks, secrecy, speed, and compliance matter more than transparency or long-term safety. 

That raises serious questions about consent, accountability, and how much the public was ever told. 

The narrative is cracking, and people are finally asking who was really in control from the start. 

#TruthExposed #mRNA #DARPA #MedicalFreedom #QuestionEverything #ViralVibes

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
on No comments:

Real estate

Yes, that's accurate based on the latest reports from January 2026.

Billionaire **Stan Kroenke** (owner of the Los Angeles Rams, Denver Nuggets, Colorado Avalanche, Arsenal FC, and other assets through Kroenke Sports & Entertainment) has become America's largest **private landowner**. This follows his December 2025 purchase of approximately **937,000 acres** of noncontiguous ranchland in New Mexico (known as the Singleton Ranches, from the heirs of Teledyne founder Henry Singleton). 

This acquisition—the largest single land purchase in the U.S. since 2011—boosted his total holdings to **more than 2.7 million acres** across the American West (including major ranches in Wyoming, Montana, Texas, Nevada) and into Canada. It vaulted him from No. 4 on The Land Report's 2025 list to No. 1 on the 2026 ranking, surpassing:

- The Emmerson family (California timber, ~2.44 million acres)
- John Malone (~2.2 million acres)
- Ted Turner (~2 million acres)

Kroenke's land is primarily used for cattle ranching, hunting, wildlife habitats, and some renewable energy. His other notable past acquisitions include the 535,000-acre Waggoner Ranch in Texas (2016), the 124,000-acre Broken O Ranch in Montana (2012), and the Winecup Gamble Ranch in Nevada (2019).

For context, his 2.7 million+ acres exceed the size of Yellowstone National Park (~2.2 million acres) and highlight a broader trend of ultra-wealthy individuals investing in land for appreciation, legacy properties, and resource use.

The image you shared aligns with coverage from outlets like The Real Deal, CNBC, The New York Times, and The Land Report, which broke the story around January 13–15, 2026.



Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
on No comments:

Thursday, January 15, 2026

Fired

No, Billy Bob Thornton is not leaving Landman; despite his character Tommy Norris being fired from his M-Tex presidency in Season 2, he is confirmed to return for Season 3, as he's central to the show, which is named after his role and was written for him. While his job changed, his storyline continues, likely focusing on a partnership with his son Cooper. 

• Confirmed Return: Thornton has stated he plans to stay on the show for years, and the series' renewal for Season 3 ensures his presence. 
• Character Arc: His firing was a plot point to shift his role, not to write him out; he's expected to work with his son, Cooper, in a new venture. 
• Show's Identity: Many believe the show would end without him, as he is the titular "Landman". [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]  

AI responses may include mistakes.




Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
on No comments:

Change

The post you're referring to from the account "Taking Back America" (posted about 4 hours ago as of your query) shares a dramatic headline: a **7-2 Supreme Court ruling** on mail-in ballots that supposedly marks a major shift for the **2028 election**.

This refers to a real U.S. Supreme Court decision issued on **January 14, 2026**, in the case involving Illinois Republican Rep. **Mike Bost** (and others) challenging the state's law on late-arriving mail-in ballots.

### What the Ruling Actually Did
The Supreme Court ruled **7-2** that candidates for federal office (like members of Congress) have **legal standing** to challenge state election laws governing how votes are counted — even if they won their election and can't prove the rule directly changed the outcome.

- Illinois law allows mail-in/absentee ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received up to about **14 days** later (during the provisional ballot counting window).
- Bost argued this violates federal statutes setting a uniform "Election Day" for federal elections.
- Lower courts dismissed the case, saying Bost lacked standing (no concrete injury since he won).
- The Supreme Court reversed that, saying candidates have a direct personal stake in the rules for counting votes in their own elections. Chief Justice **John Roberts** wrote the majority opinion.
- The two dissenters were Justices **Sonia Sotomayor** and **Ketanji Brown Jackson**, who warned it could open the floodgates to more election litigation and destabilize the process.

Importantly:  
This ruling **does not** ban or restrict mail-in ballots nationwide. It doesn't declare late-arriving ballots unconstitutional. It only revives Bost's lawsuit and sends it back to lower courts to decide the merits. It makes it easier for candidates to bring similar challenges in the future.

### Connection to 2028 (and Broader Context)
The post exaggerates this as a game-changer for **2028** (the next presidential election). Some conservative outlets and commentators frame it that way because:
- It could encourage more lawsuits against "grace periods" for late mail ballots in various states.
- A separate pending case (e.g., involving Mississippi's 5-day grace period) might address the substantive issue of whether such laws conflict with federal "Election Day" rules — potentially with bigger implications if decided similarly.
- Broader Republican efforts (including executive actions) have targeted extended counting windows, often citing concerns over election integrity and confidence.

However, mainstream reports emphasize this is procedural (about who can sue), not a direct ban or overhaul. It won't automatically stop mail-in voting or late counts in 2026 midterms or 2028. Many states have long allowed grace periods for practical reasons (e.g., mail delays, especially in rural or overseas/military voting).

The image in the post (stacks of ballots + a photo likely of Justice Clarence Thomas or another figure) is typical sensational framing from partisan accounts, but it doesn't reflect new evidence of fraud or a sweeping invalidation.

If you're seeing claims of this "ending mail-in ballots" or proving widespread cheating, those go beyond what the ruling actually says. It's more about opening courthouse doors for challenges than resolving the underlying debate. For the full opinion or details, check official Supreme Court sources or neutral outlets like AP, PBS, or SCOTUSblog. Let me know if you want more on related cases!



Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
on No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)