"No One Is Prepared for What’s About to Happen in California... | Victor...

Post from Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer)

Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) posted at 10:47 AM on Fri, May 16, 2025:
How many more failures does the MAGA base need to see from the current DOJ to know that Blondi was a massive mistake?

You know, if we actually had a competent DOJ, instead of a DOJ that's hiring illegal alien advocates (Ashleigh Bondoc) and nominating Marxists to the DOJ,
(https://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/1923404978967998656?t=YN3FsOoZxnmYIlFxcitzUw&s=03)

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

https://www.facebook.com/share/1HMP2Dc3F2/?mibextid=xfxF2i

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

Karoline Leavitt LIVE: ‘Russia Has Declared, They Won’t…’: Trump Secy’s ...

RE: Why Topeka is a JOKE - it starts at the top.

Mr. McClure,

 

Thank you for your message.  This message serves as confirmation that your email has been received by the council members.

 

Tonya L. Bailey

Sr. Executive Assistant to the City Council

City of Topeka

215 SE 7th St. Rm 255

785-368-1671

 

"The preceding email message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges or that may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not listed as a recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful."

 

From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2025 7:09 AM
To: Michael Padilla <mpadilla@topeka.org>; Spencer Duncan <sduncan@topeka.org>; Robert M. Perez <rmperez@topeka.org>; Governing Body <governingbody@topeka.org>; MCRE Media <mcre1.snco@blogger.com>
Subject: Why Topeka is a JOKE - it starts at the top.

 

Notice: -----This message was sent by an external sender-----

 

The mayor, as the presiding officer of city council meetings, holds a position that demands professionalism, respect, and undivided attention to the matters at hand. Eating during these meetings is inappropriate and undermines the decorum expected of such a public role. Here are several compelling reasons why the mayor should refrain from eating while chairing city council meetings, emphasizing the rudeness and broader implications of such behavior.

First, eating during a meeting is inherently distracting. City council meetings are formal gatherings where critical issues—budget allocations, policy decisions, and community concerns—are discussed. The act of eating, whether it’s chewing, unwrapping food, or sipping loudly, draws attention away from the agenda. It sends a signal that the mayor is not fully engaged, which can frustrate council members, staff, and attendees who expect leadership to prioritize the proceedings. For example, a constituent presenting a grievance might feel dismissed if the mayor is munching on a sandwich instead of listening attentively. This distraction undermines the gravity of the discussions and erodes public trust.

Second, eating in this context is disrespectful to participants. Council meetings involve diverse stakeholders—residents, business owners, and advocacy groups—who often prepare extensively to voice their concerns. When the mayor eats, it conveys a lack of regard for their efforts, implying that their contributions are secondary to personal needs. This is particularly offensive in public-facing roles where optics matter. A mayor who eats while a resident speaks risks appearing dismissive or indifferent, which can alienate the community and weaken civic engagement. Respect demands that the mayor model attentiveness, setting a tone of mutual courtesy.

Third, it violates basic professional etiquette. In most formal settings—courtrooms, boardrooms, or legislative sessions—eating is considered unprofessional unless explicitly designated, such as during a working lunch. City council meetings, often broadcasted or recorded, are public performances of governance. The mayor’s behavior reflects on the entire municipality. Eating on camera or in view of attendees can project an image of carelessness, potentially embarrassing the city and diminishing its reputation. Professionalism requires the mayor to prioritize the meeting’s purpose over personal comfort.

Additionally, eating can disrupt the meeting’s flow. Handling food may cause delays, such as pausing to wipe hands or address a spill, which wastes time and frustrates participants. It also risks creating an informal atmosphere where others feel permitted to eat, further eroding the meeting’s structure. The mayor’s role is to maintain order and focus, not contribute to distractions.

Finally, the mayor’s actions set a precedent. If the presiding officer eats, it may normalize similar behavior among council members or attendees, leading to a less disciplined environment. The mayor must model the conduct expected of others, reinforcing the importance of civic duty and respect.

In conclusion, the mayor should abstain from eating during city council meetings to uphold professionalism, respect participants, maintain focus, and set a positive example. This small act of restraint strengthens public trust and ensures the meetings serve their democratic purpose effectively.

--

Henry McClure 

Time kills deals

785-383-9994

 

www.henrymcclure.live