Fwd: Medieval Europe's strangest trials

In Europe during the Middle Ages, crime and punishment were often theatrical, with crowds gathering to witness executions and public humiliations.

Animals could be put on trial in medieval Europe.

World History

I n Europe during the Middle Ages, crime and punishment were often theatrical, with crowds gathering to witness executions and public humiliations. But what they witnessed wasn't always a human trial — often, medieval courts meted out justice on animals. France kept the most extensive records of these trials, but they were also held in Switzerland, Germany, and occasionally Italy and Spain. There were two main types of medieval animal trials: secular trials, usually against one animal or a small group of animals, and religious proceedings on a group of pests, such as mice or locusts. The idea of animals on trial may seem whimsical now, but these were deadly serious affairs, with the same judges, executioners, and expenses of a human trial.

A surprisingly large number of the single-animal trials were pigs that had committed violence against human children. In one 1457 case in Savigny, France, a sow was accused of killing a 5-year-old child with her own six piglets tagging along. Her owner was accused only of negligence, but the pig was sentenced to death. Because the court could not prove their involvement, the piglets were spared. As for the mass trials in ecclesiastical courts, the local bishop (or someone from his staff) would typically appoint a human proxy for the accused pests. This person would have the impossible task of telling the accused to show up for their court date. In one case, a group of flies failed to appear and the court took pity on them for their small size and young age and assigned them different counsel. As part of the proceedings, a judge would hold one member of the species and tell it to leave. If it left, the community would give thankful prayers. If it stayed, the judge would excommunicate the pests from the church, and start organizing people to help rid them from the area.

Science Stories You Can't Get Anywhere Else

Feed your curiosity with Nautilus, the science newsletter for thinkers and seekers. Each week, explore beautifully written stories where science meets philosophy and culture — from the physics of time to the psychology of awe. Join a global community of curious minds and start seeing the world in a whole new way.

Subscribe Now

This content is brought to you by our sponsor which helps keep History Facts free.

By the Numbers

Cost (in Parisian livre) of one sow's trial and execution 3.5 Pig population in France as of December 2022 12 million Pig population in France as of December 2022 12 million

Approximate length (in years) of the Middle Ages (500-1500 CE) 1,000 Typical number of jurors in a modern criminal trial 12 Typical number of jurors in a modern criminal trial 12

Did you know?

A Norman church had a pig execution mural.

One of the better-known cases of porcine capital punishment was in the Norman town of Falaise, located in modern-day northwestern France. In the 14th century, a local tribunal found a sow guilty of killing a 3-month-old child and condemned it to be mutilated and hung to death. The sentence was carried out in the public square with the pig dressed in human garments, a scene that was immortalized in a fresco on the west wall of Falaise's Church of the Holy Trinity. The tableau may have inspired a fictional mural mentioned in Geoffrey Chaucer's The Knight's Tale. The real-life art was whitewashed over in about 1820, and only written accounts of the painting survive — although there's a sketch of the scene in the 1872 French text L'homme et la Bête (The Man and the Beast).

Thank you for supporting our advertisers!

Recommended Reading

U.S. History

The Secret Service Code Names of 9 U.S. Presidents ➝

U.S. History

Strange Workplace Etiquette of the 1960s ➝

+ Load more

Discover something new History Facts is part of Optimism, which publishes content that uplifts, informs, and inspires. 13 Surprising Facts About the World's Population Interesting Facts ➝ Natural Cold Remedies That Actually Work Better Report ➝ Why Do Brits Spell "Colour" With an "ou"? Word Smarts ➝

A daily digest of history's most fascinating happenings.

Want to unsubscribe? Click here Click here

About Contact us Privacy Policy Terms of Use Do Not Sell My Info

Contact us

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

Do Not Sell My Info

Copyright © 2025 History Facts. All rights reserved.

700 N Colorado Blvd, #513, Denver, CO 80206

Advertisements: Powered by • AdChoices

--

Henry McClure 

Time kills deals

785-383-9994

www.henrymcclure.live

Fwd: Is the key to weight loss in your TRASH? 🤔

Henry,   Could the solution to low energy and weight gain be found in…   Tangerine peels?     The answer is YES!   (But don't worry: You don't have to eat them! There's an even EASIER way to enjoy the same energizing, weight-loss effects… without the bitterness.)   See, there are rogue cells in your body that throw off your biological clock —   AKA what keeps a TON of your bodily functions in check…   From your energy levels, to your weight loss journey, to everything else in between.   Sadly, those rogue cells can lead to "brain fog"… struggling to lose weight…   And feeling weak, fatigued, or tired more than usual.   But scientists have discovered a super nutrient in tangerine PEELS — which can help reset your body's biological clock.   Like I said, though: You don't have to eat them — but their zest really perks up meals and salads!   Instead, there's an easier way to get this super nutrient into your body.   It's a 60-second, at-home trick I discovered myself — and after literal DAYS of adding it to MY routine…   I had an extra pep in my step for my daily walks around the neighborhood…   I felt more clear-minded and less "foggy" in the head…   And my pants even felt a little looser around the waist!   And now I'm sharing my at-home energizing, weight loss trick in a brief video just for YOU.     Go ahead and try it yourself — and don't be surprised when you start to feel more energized and less bloated than you have in AGES. Looking out for you, Steven Gundry, MD This email was sent to mcre13@gmail.com by Gundry MD Manage Preferences | VIP Discounts | Join Text Club 145 S. Fairfax Avenue Suite 200 Los Angeles, California 90036 These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.

You received this email from Gundry MD. If you would like to unsubscribe, click here.

--

Henry McClure 

Time kills deals

785-383-9994

www.henrymcclure.live

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJo0R6ePuM4/?igsh=MTQ4c3J1cDNjNTBiMg==

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1ypKdZrQwqrJW?t=EkUce0OU3vwNQgFAzGIaoQ&s=03

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

see my YouTube page = https://www.youtube.com/@HenryMcClure

To assess whether 2,263 views in the last 28 days is good for a YouTube channel, we need to consider average view counts and industry benchmarks, as this depends on factors like channel size, niche, and platform norms.

Based on general YouTube analytics and industry insights, small to medium channels (under 10,000 subscribers) typically see an average of 10-100 views per video, with total channel views varying widely. For context, a channel posting one video per week (4 videos in 28 days) might expect 40-400 views total for a small channel, assuming each video gets 10-100 views. Channels with consistent posting and moderate engagement can achieve higher averages, around 500-5,000 views per 28 days, depending on subscriber count and content quality.

Your 2,263 views in 28 days equate to roughly 81 views per day. Without specifics on your channel (e.g., subscriber count, video frequency, or niche), here’s a breakdown:

• Small channels (<1,000 subscribers): 2,263 views is above average, especially if you’re posting infrequently or have a niche audience. It suggests decent engagement or discoverability.
• Medium channels (1,000-10,000 subscribers): This is solid but closer to average, particularly if you’re posting multiple videos weekly. Channels in this range often aim for 1,000-10,000 views per video.
• Large channels (>10,000 subscribers): 2,263 views would be below average unless you’re posting sparingly or your content has low discoverability.

To benchmark further, YouTube’s algorithm favors consistent uploads, high watch time, and click-through rates. If you’re achieving 2,263 views with just a few videos, your per-video performance is strong. For example, 4 videos averaging ~565 views each is excellent for a small channel but modest for a larger one.

Could you share your subscriber count, how many videos you posted in those 28 days, or your content niche? This would help me give a more tailored assessment. Alternatively, I can search for real-time YouTube analytics trends or check specific channel data if you provide your channel name.