​Yes, the core claim is real, but the viral post's framing is heavily politicized and somewhat exaggerated for dramatic effect.

In April 2025, Valero Energy officially announced plans to idle (shut down refining operations) at its Benicia refinery in California by the end of April 2026. As part of evaluating its California operations (including the Wilmington refinery), the company recorded a pre-tax impairment charge of $1.1 billion in Q1 2025. This accounting write-down reflects the reduced value of those assets, essentially acknowledging they won't generate expected future profits under current conditions — and it's the figure widely cited as the "$1 billion loss" to exit.This isn't a direct cash payment to "get out," but rather a massive financial hit (impairment + related costs like asset retirement obligations) tied to ceasing operations rather than continuing under California's regulatory environment.Key details from reliable sources (including Valero's own investor statements and Reuters reporting):

• The decision stems from high operating costs, stringent environmental regulations (e.g., emissions standards, Low Carbon Fuel Standard compliance), fines (like an $82 million penalty in 2024 for violations), and broader market pressures.
• Valero cited the "challenging regulatory and enforcement environment" as a major factor.
• This follows similar moves by other refiners (e.g., Phillips 66 shutting its Los Angeles-area plant in late 2025), reducing California's in-state refining capacity significantly and raising concerns about future gas prices and supply.

The post's narrative — that Valero is "fleeing" Gavin Newsom's "toxic" mandates and political chaos at any cost — aligns with conservative commentary and X posts amplifying the story in late 2025/early 2026. Republican figures and outlets have framed it as proof of failed Democratic policies driving businesses away.However, some analyses (e.g., from UC Berkeley economists) point to additional factors like the refinery's age, past operational issues (fires, leaks), poor performance, and the long-term shift away from fossil fuels (including California's 2035 ban on new gas car sales), making continued investment unviable regardless of politics.Recent updates (as of January 2026) show Valero is powering down the refinery but plans to keep supplying California via imports and inventories after April — so it's not a full "exit" from the market, just from refining there. Ongoing talks with the state could even extend or modify operations.In short: The $1 billion+ hit and 2026 shutdown timeline are factual, driven significantly by California's tough regulations — but it's a complex business decision, not purely a dramatic "escape." The viral meme captures a real event but spins it strongly. This will likely contribute to higher gas prices in California as in-state supply drops.

--

Henry McClure 

Time kills deals

785-383-9994

www.henrymcclure.live