Good for the goose is good for the gander?

Here are **five ways** in which Mexico's immigration policy has often been described as stricter than that of the United States, particularly in enforcement practices and treatment of irregular migration (especially from Central America and other transit countries). These points draw from historical and ongoing comparisons, noting that policies evolve and both countries have tightened controls in recent years.

1. **Higher deportation rates relative to apprehensions**  

   Mexico has historically deported a much higher percentage of apprehended migrants compared to the US. For example, in periods like 2004–2018, Mexico deported about 94% of apprehended Central American migrants, while the US often apprehended far more than it deported (due to asylum processing, releases, or other factors). In specific years (e.g., 2015–2018), Mexico deported more Central Americans than the US did, despite the US having a much larger overall unauthorized population and border flow.

2. **Stricter enforcement and use of military/national guard for border control**  

   Mexico has deployed its National Guard (and previously other forces) extensively to enforce its southern border with Guatemala, intercepting migrants in transit and restricting movement northward. This has included busing migrants back south, checkpoints, and disruptions to migrant routes—often in direct response to US pressure. The US enforces its border primarily through Border Patrol and ICE, but Mexico's approach has been characterized as more aggressive in blocking transit migration.

3. **Visa requirements and restrictions on transit/asylum access**  

   Mexico has imposed visa requirements on nationals from countries like Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti, and others in recent years, and restricted humanitarian visas or transit permissions that previously allowed migrants to move through the country while awaiting US asylum claims. It has also kept many asylum seekers in southern Mexico rather than allowing them to reach the US border. While the US has asylum restrictions (e.g., metering, Remain in Mexico), Mexico's policies have limited onward movement more directly for non-Mexicans.

4. **Criminalization and penalties for irregular entry (historically harsher)**  

   Prior to reforms (e.g., pre-2008), unauthorized entry into Mexico could result in jail time (up to two years), and even after decriminalization, enforcement remains firm with fines, detention, and rapid removal. Some sources describe Mexico's overall framework for legal residency and citizenship as more difficult and restrictive for many foreigners compared to US pathways, though the US has per-country caps and backlogs.

5. **Rapid removals and cooperation in deportations**  

   Mexico frequently cooperates with the US on deportations (including accepting third-country nationals in some cases) and carries out swift removals of non-Mexicans to their origin countries. In contrast, the US system often involves longer processing times due to court backlogs, asylum claims, and legal protections. Recent Mexican administrations have increased deportations and enforcement budgets, contributing to sharp drops in migrant flows through the country.

Note that "stricter" is subjective and context-dependent—Mexico faces different migration dynamics (primarily as a transit country) than the US (primarily a destination). Both nations have faced criticism for enforcement practices, and recent years show convergence in tougher controls.

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals