Henry McClure
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
Thursday, August 21, 2025
Fwd: Sunflower Association of REALTORS, Inc., Candidate Forum
Henry McClure
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Humphrey, Denise <Denise@sunflowerrealtors.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 21, 2025, 3:06 PM
Subject: Sunflower Association of REALTORS, Inc., Candidate Forum
To: Humphrey, Denise <Denise@sunflowerrealtors.com>
Cc: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>, duncanfortopeka@yahoo.com <duncanfortopeka@yahoo.com>, karen@hillerfortopeka.com <karen@hillerfortopeka.com>, william@williamnaeger.com <william@williamnaeger.com>, contact@daisyfortopeka.com <contact@daisyfortopeka.com>, bdk@hotmail.com <bdk@hotmail.com>, earl4topeka@gmail.com <earl4topeka@gmail.com>, chris.deister@gmail.com <chris.deister@gmail.com>, hofererfortopeka@gmail.com <hofererfortopeka@gmail.com>, helptopeka@gmail.com <helptopeka@gmail.com>
From: Humphrey, Denise <Denise@sunflowerrealtors.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 21, 2025, 3:06 PM
Subject: Sunflower Association of REALTORS, Inc., Candidate Forum
To: Humphrey, Denise <Denise@sunflowerrealtors.com>
Cc: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>, duncanfortopeka@yahoo.com <duncanfortopeka@yahoo.com>, karen@hillerfortopeka.com <karen@hillerfortopeka.com>, william@williamnaeger.com <william@williamnaeger.com>, contact@daisyfortopeka.com <contact@daisyfortopeka.com>, bdk@hotmail.com <bdk@hotmail.com>, earl4topeka@gmail.com <earl4topeka@gmail.com>, chris.deister@gmail.com <chris.deister@gmail.com>, hofererfortopeka@gmail.com <hofererfortopeka@gmail.com>, helptopeka@gmail.com <helptopeka@gmail.com>
Good afternoon!
The Sunflower Association of REALTORS®, Inc., represents over 550 licensed real estate agents and professionals in real estate affiliated businesses. We are looking to host a candidate forum for mayoral and city council candidates on Tuesday, September 30th, from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Candidates will be allowed an opening statement, and then questions will be posed to panel members by our moderators.
We'd be honored by your participation in this event. You may reply to this email to let me know if you're able to attend at that time. More information, including potential questions, will be sent once the date is confirmed. Feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns.
We look forward to your response! Have a great rest of your day!
Fwd: REVEALED: My new "longevity routine" (takes 2 minutes)
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Steven Gundry, MD <newsletter@gundrymd.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:58 AM
Subject: REVEALED: My new "longevity routine" (takes 2 minutes)
To: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
From: Steven Gundry, MD <newsletter@gundrymd.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:58 AM
Subject: REVEALED: My new "longevity routine" (takes 2 minutes)
To: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
|
|
| You received this email from Gundry MD. If you would like to unsubscribe, click here. |
Henry McClure
Time kills deals
785-383-9994
www.henrymcclure.live
Wednesday, August 20, 2025
You have options
Yes, you can incorporate both NRP (NeuroImaging PREProcessing toolS) and TIFF files within the same project
NRP tools, such as fMRIPrep, are designed to generate minimally preprocessed neuroimaging data that are ready for further analysis, according to NiPreps (https://www.nipreps.org/nipreps-book/nipreps/nipreps.html). These tools are meant to be agnostic to downstream analysis, meaning they don't perform operations like spatial smoothing which are tied to specific statistical models. [1, 2, 3]
TIFF (Tagged Image File Format) files are commonly used for storing image data, including medical and scientific images. [4, 5, 6]
How they can work together:
• Input for NRP tools: You might start with raw neuroimaging data in formats that can be processed by NRP tools, potentially including data from various imaging modalities that are ultimately converted to or managed within a project that can also handle TIFF images.
• Outputs from NRP tools: NRP tools generate preprocessed data, which can then be visualized and analyzed further. While the direct output format of NRP tools might not always be TIFF, the preprocessed data can be used to generate visualizations that can be saved in TIFF format or be part of a larger project that incorporates TIFF images for other purposes.
• Visualization and Integration:
• TIFF images are excellent for displaying neuroimaging results, such as statistical maps, anatomical overlays, or various slices generated from the preprocessed data.
• Many visualization tools and software packages commonly used in neuroscience and related fields support both neuroimaging data formats (which NRP tools might handle internally or output) and TIFF images.
• Tools like ImageJ/Fiji, QuPath, Napari, CellProfiler, and even some programming languages with libraries like Python's or can read, process, and display TIFF files alongside analysis data derived from NRP workflows. [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]
Examples:
• Generating anatomical atlases in TIFF: You might use NRP tools to process raw MRI scans and then generate anatomical atlases or regions of interest that can be saved as TIFF files for visualization and comparison with other data.
• Overlaying functional data on anatomical TIFFs: You could take functional activation maps generated from NRP-processed fMRI data and overlay them onto high-resolution anatomical images stored as TIFF files for comprehensive visualization.
• Integrating microscopy and neuroimaging data: If your project involves both microscopy images (often stored as TIFFs) and neuroimaging data, you can use NRP tools for the neuroimaging component and then integrate the results with the microscopy data for a more holistic analysis. [12, 13, 14]
In summary, NRP tools prepare neuroimaging data for analysis, while TIFF files are suitable for storing images, including visualizations and other image-based data within a project. The outputs from NRP tools can be visualized and combined with TIFF files for various research and analysis purposes. [15, 16]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] https://www.nipreps.org/nipreps-book/nipreps/nipreps.html[2] https://www.nipreps.org/nipreps-book/nipreps/nipreps.html[3] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7762845/[4] https://www.peernet.com/best-file-formats-for-business-tasks/[5] https://digitize.library.ubc.ca/digitizers-blog/how-we-digitize-microfilm/[6] https://expertphotography.com/tiff-vs-jpeg-vs-raw/[7] https://www.narps.info/analysis.html[8] https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.4326[9] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11968550/[10] https://www.rockefeller.edu/bioimaging/image-analysis-data-management/[11] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11160600/[12] https://www.protocols.io/view/pipeline-for-image-processing-and-quantification-o-4r3l2qojpl1y/v1[13] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7366126/[14] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4332798/[15] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41596-023-00881-0[16] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37816904/
Henry McClure
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
Topeka Kansas
Mayor Mike Padilla is exiting stage left. That alone tells a story. He is leaving behind rising utility rates that the city locked in for 2024 through 2026, with 2025's increases already baked into the published rate sheets. Voters are not imagining higher water, wastewater, and stormwater bills. They were approved, scheduled, and posted, and residents are paying them right now.  
City Manager Robert Perez talks about stability while senior staff heads keep rolling. In the span of days this month, the city attorney resigned, the city planning director resigned, and Perez issued statements to calm nerves. When your legal counsel and your planning lead walk out in the middle of budget season and housing initiatives, "we're steady" does not pass the laugh test.  
Deputy Mayor Brett Kell was elevated by his colleagues back in January to run meetings and help set the agenda. Fine. Where is the visible win residents can feel on their street or on their bill? As deputy, his job is to move basics faster, not narrate them. The record so far is ceremonies and promises while the city scrambles more pothole crews and still holds hearings on the same aging-infrastructure problems.   
The governing body keeps touting "planning" and "engagement." Translation in Topeka has been more meetings, more hearings, and more rate models. The FY2025 budget was marketed as structurally balanced, which is good, but residents notice what is balanced on their back. Every family that opened a higher utility bill this year understands the difference between a slide deck and a result. 
Here is the kicker. Barely one in ten voters even showed up for the primary. That is not civic pride, that is civic fatigue. If the current cast were inspiring confidence, turnout would not be stuck under ten percent. The city deserves leadership that earns attention without a crisis.
Henry McClure
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
Fwd: SPECIAL Transient Guest Tax Committee Meeting-August 27, 2025
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: City of Topeka, Kansas <no-reply@topeka.org>
Date: Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Subject: SPECIAL Transient Guest Tax Committee Meeting-August 27, 2025
To: <mcre13@gmail.com>
From: City of Topeka, Kansas <no-reply@topeka.org>
Date: Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Subject: SPECIAL Transient Guest Tax Committee Meeting-August 27, 2025
To: <mcre13@gmail.com>
|
Henry McClure
Time kills deals
785-383-9994
www.henrymcclure.live
this is good
While it's easy to point out what's wrong, I believe it's just as important to recognize that our local leaders are human too. This is their first time living and leading, just like it is for all of us. When we extend grace, patience, and constructive feedback, we create space for growth and collaboration. Together, we can help shape a stronger Topeka.
Henry McClure
Time kills deals
785-383-9994
www.henrymcclure.live
Re: KORA Request for Voter Count and Details on $9.5 Million ATT Building Allocation
The vote count for the Go Topeka Board was listed as a percentage.
I want a roll call.
I want each name and how they voted.
We deserve transparency.
H
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 2:57 PM Stephanie Moran <stephanie.moran@topekapartnership.com> wrote:
The official meeting minutes from the GO Topeka Board Meeting on December 3, 2024 were provided via email on July 11th per the KORA request sent by Mr. McClure on July 8th.
From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2025 7:41 PM
To: City Clerk <cclerk@topeka.org>; Molly Howey (Go Topeka) <mhowey@gotopeka.com>; Molly Howey <molly.howey@topekapartnership.com>; Molly Howey <mhowey@topekachamber.org>; Stephanie Moran <stephanie.moran@topekapartnership.com>; countyclerk@snco.us; MCRE Media <mcre1.snco@blogger.com>; Governing Body <governingbody@topeka.org>
Subject: KORA Request for Voter Count and Details on $9.5 Million ATT Building Allocation
Under the Kansas Open Records Act (KORA), I am requesting the specific voter count and detailed information regarding the individuals who voted on the allocation of $9.5 million for the ATT building at the Go Topeka meeting held prior to the December JEDO meeting. While a percentage breakdown of the vote has been provided, the public is entitled to transparency regarding the individual voting records and how each member voted on this matter.
Please provide the requested information in accordance with KORA requirements. Thank you for your attention to this request.
Henry McClure
Time kills deals
785-383-9994
www.henrymcclure.live
RE: KORA Request for Voter Count and Details on $9.5 Million ATT Building Allocation
The official meeting minutes from the GO Topeka Board Meeting on December 3, 2024 were provided via email on July 11th per the KORA request sent by Mr. McClure on July 8th.
From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2025 7:41 PM
To: City Clerk <cclerk@topeka.org>; Molly Howey (Go Topeka) <mhowey@gotopeka.com>; Molly Howey <molly.howey@topekapartnership.com>; Molly Howey <mhowey@topekachamber.org>; Stephanie Moran <stephanie.moran@topekapartnership.com>; countyclerk@snco.us; MCRE Media <mcre1.snco@blogger.com>; Governing Body <governingbody@topeka.org>
Subject: KORA Request for Voter Count and Details on $9.5 Million ATT Building Allocation
Under the Kansas Open Records Act (KORA), I am requesting the specific voter count and detailed information regarding the individuals who voted on the allocation of $9.5 million for the ATT building at the Go Topeka meeting held prior to the December JEDO meeting. While a percentage breakdown of the vote has been provided, the public is entitled to transparency regarding the individual voting records and how each member voted on this matter.
Please provide the requested information in accordance with KORA requirements. Thank you for your attention to this request.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/people-1-first_the-small-things-we-do-daily-often-shape-activity-7363896751021289473-kK_5?utm_source=social_share_video_v2&utm_medium=android_app&rcm=ACoAAALwhqkBXKiktP0csRtTkeh18TJkbO60efE&utm_campaign=share_via
Henry McClure
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
Corn
France did not make all corn illegal. The country has banned the cultivation of a specific type of genetically modified (GM) corn called MON810, produced by Monsanto, on multiple occasions due to environmental concerns. While these bans were often temporary and challenged in court, France eventually moved towards a definitive ban of MON810 in 2014. [1, 2]
Here's a more detailed timeline:
• 2008: France initially banned MON810, but this was overturned by a court. [2, 3]
• 2011 & 2013: France implemented temporary bans on GM corn, including MON810. [1, 3]
• March 2014: France banned MON810 again. [1, 4]
• May 2014: The ban was definitively upheld by both the highest court and the Senate. [1, 5]
• Focus on MON810: The bans specifically target MON810, which is the only insect-resistant GM corn approved for cultivation in the European Union, according to Phys.org. [1, 4]
• Temporary bans: Previous bans were often lifted due to legal challenges, but France persisted in its efforts to restrict the cultivation of MON810 due to environmental concerns. [1, 4]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] https://phys.org/news/2014-05-france-definitively-gm-corn.html[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/19/business/worldbusiness/19cnd-gmo.html[3] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/may/22/french-ban-gm-maize-rejected[4] https://phys.org/news/2013-08-french-court-monsanto-gm-corn.html[5] https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/france-definitively-bans-genetically-modified-corn-560275
Henry McClure
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
Re: FW: McClure KORA 081425
Thank you
Henry McClure
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025, 9:13 AM Bonnie Williams <bowilliams@topeka.org> wrote:
In addition to the information below, please see the attached page of the 2025-2027 CIB.
Bonnie Williams
Services and Operations Manager
City of Topeka
Legal Department
215 SE 7th Street, Room 353
Topeka, KS 66603
(785) 368-3883
NOTICE: This message and any attachments may be confidential and contain legally privileged information. If you are not an employee of the City of Topeka (see K.S.A. 75-6102(d)), we do not waive any legal protection that may apply such as attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the message and any attachments. Further, this communication is not intended to constitute, nor should it be relied upon, as legal advice to you.
From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 5:45 PM
To: Bonnie Williams <bowilliams@topeka.org>
Cc: City Clerk <cclerk@topeka.org>; Mary E. Kuckelman Spinelli <mespinelli@topeka.org>; MCRE Media <mcre1.snco@blogger.com>
Subject: Re: FW: McClure KORA 081425
Notice: -----This message was sent by an external sender-----
Sorry - I will do better - as mayor, I can walk to your office
On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 5:44 PM Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com> wrote:
just the cost of the project - design and final
On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 3:11 PM Bonnie Williams <bowilliams@topeka.org> wrote:
Mr. McClure:
Your KORA request does not clearly state what records you are looking for but staff pulled together the information below. Please let us know if there are other records you are seeking.
Bonnie Williams
Services and Operations Manager
City of Topeka
Legal Department
215 SE 7th Street, Room 353
Topeka, KS 66603
(785) 368-3883
NOTICE: This message and any attachments may be confidential and contain legally privileged information. If you are not an employee of the City of Topeka (see K.S.A. 75-6102(d)), we do not waive any legal protection that may apply such as attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the message and any attachments. Further, this communication is not intended to constitute, nor should it be relied upon, as legal advice to you.
02/04/2025 Governing Body Meeting Minutes
"DISCUSSION of a Contract Amendment for the SW Huntoon Street, Street Design Project from Gage Boulevard to Harrison Street, was presented. (Project No. 701028.00) Mike Moriarty, Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) Director of Planning and Development, reported the Governing Body approved the original design contract to only include preliminary design and public engagement; however, based on public comment, Staff was recommending the full reconstruction of the road including reduction to one travel lane, the inclusion of appropriate "Complete Streets" items and replacement/repair of water, storm and sanitary utilities with a maximum increase of $2,988,860 for a total project budget not to exceed $3,337,340."
https://www.topeka.org/wp-content/uploads/citycouncil/Minutes/2025/020425m.pdf
02/11/2025 Governing Body Meeting Minutes
"Councilmember Miller moved to approve the contract. The motion seconded by Councilmember Duncan carried on roll call vote. Councilmembers Ortiz, Banks, Duncan and Hoferer voted "no." (6-4-0)"
https://www.topeka.org/wp-content/uploads/citycouncil/Minutes/2025/021125m.pdf
The information above is available to the public on the City of Topeka webpage www.topeka.org.
Also, a project website is maintained by Bartlett & West. www.huntoonstreetproject.com. Materials presented at the public meeting on 08/13/2025 should be posted on the site soon.
From: Spencer Duncan <sduncan@topeka.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2025 1:45 PM
To: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>; City Clerk <cclerk@topeka.org>; City Manager <citymanager@topeka.org>; MCRE Media <mcre1.snco@blogger.com>
Subject: Re: Huntoon
There was a public meeting at the library last night. It was mentioned at a council meeting, it was posted to the public, it was on social media and I believe I even saw it mentioned on one of the TV stations. The meeting appeared to have well over 100 people (if not more during two hours), who attended and were able to look at drawings and plans and speak with city staff and others about the designs. I believe notices were also sent out to the people who live in the area and businesses that will be impacted.
This was a public input session to get feedback and answer questions before anything is officially presented to the Governing Body, and people certainly turned out with questions. comments and suggestions. And yes, they had a presentation and drawings and designs, all made available to the public in a public space after being publicly advertised.
Is this the meeting you are asking about?
While I believe you may be close on the contract expense, I would ask staff to provide the actual number. I voted NO on that contract.
Thank you,
Spencer
Spencer Duncan
Topeka City Council
Representing District 8
785-207-8985
From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2025 1:12 PM
To: City Clerk <cclerk@topeka.org>; Spencer Duncan <sduncan@topeka.org>; City Manager <citymanager@topeka.org>; MCRE Media <mcre1.snco@blogger.com>
Subject: Huntoon
Notice: -----This message was sent by an external sender-----
KORA
Please confirm that the project engineer for the Huntoon Project has been released and is working on drawings.
As I remember, Bartlett and West got a $3.5 million contract.
Spencer
If this is so, what was the meeting about?
--
--
--
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)