Wednesday, February 26, 2025

Post from ANA COUPER ♃ 𒀭 𒀉 𒀭𒊹 (@ana_couper)

ANA COUPER ♃ 𒀭 𒀉 𒀭𒊹 (@ana_couper) posted at 8:12 AM on Tue, Feb 25, 2025:
I am so done with pretending I don't know anything. Lately I have been stalked, copied and quite frankly abused, by people (Corps, Teams) because I won't hand over my math.

But it's there, I know it, they know it and now everyone wants to own it. I will share in my own time.
(https://x.com/ana_couper/status/1894389959601394044?t=8UgIhXnd1dUeS-f94cppfQ&s=03)

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

Thursday, February 20, 2025

It seems like you're asking for the forms of government—specifically city manager (council-manager) versus strong mayor—for the top ten capital cities in the United States, likely ranked by population. Your previous question asked about "top ten capital cities" globally, but this one specifies "in the United States of America," so I'll interpret it as the ten most populous state capital cities in the U.S. as of the latest estimates. I'll then identify whether each operates under a council-manager system (city manager) or a strong mayor system, based on their municipal governance structures. The current date is February 20, 2025, and I'll use the most recent data available to me.
Top Ten U.S. State Capital Cities by Population
Here's the list of the top ten U.S. state capital cities by population, using the most recent U.S. Census Bureau estimates (typically 2020 city proper figures, with updates where available), followed by their forms of government:
Phoenix, Arizona  
Population: ~1.6 million (2020)  
Form of Government: Council-Manager  
Phoenix operates under a council-manager system. The city council, including a mayor elected at-large, appoints a professional city manager to oversee daily operations and implement policies. The mayor has a vote on the council but lacks veto power or strong executive authority, typical of a weak mayor in this system.
Austin, Texas  
Population: ~961,000 (2020)  
Form of Government: Council-Manager  
Austin uses a council-manager system. The mayor is elected citywide and serves on the council, but the city manager, appointed by the council, holds executive authority over administration. The mayor's role is largely ceremonial and legislative, not a strong executive.
Columbus, Ohio  
Population: ~905,000 (2020)  
Form of Government: Strong Mayor  
Columbus has a mayor-council government with a strong mayor system. The mayor is directly elected, serves as the chief executive, appoints department heads, and has veto power over council legislation, which the council can override with a two-thirds vote.
Indianapolis, Indiana  
Population: ~887,000 (2020)  
Form of Government: Strong Mayor  
Indianapolis operates under a consolidated city-county government (Unigov) with a strong mayor system. The mayor is directly elected, exercises significant executive authority, appoints officials, and manages the budget, while the council serves as the legislative body.
Denver, Colorado  
Population: ~715,000 (2020)  
Form of Government: Strong Mayor  
Denver has a strong mayor-council system. The mayor is directly elected, holds broad executive powers (appointing department heads, preparing the budget, veto power), and operates independently of the city council, which handles legislation.
Nashville, Tennessee  
Population: ~689,000 (2020)  
Form of Government: Strong Mayor  
Nashville uses a metropolitan government structure with a strong mayor system. The mayor, elected at-large, serves as the chief executive with authority over administration, budget, and appointments, while the Metro Council legislates.
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma  
Population: ~681,000 (2020)  
Form of Government: Council-Manager  
Oklahoma City employs a council-manager system. The mayor is elected citywide and sits on the council, but the city manager, appointed by the council, manages day-to-day operations and executes policies, limiting the mayor to a weaker role.
Sacramento, California  
Population: ~524,000 (2020)  
Form of Government: Council-Manager  
Sacramento operates under a council-manager system. The mayor is elected at-large and serves as a council member, but the city manager, appointed by the council, holds executive authority over city operations.
Boston, Massachusetts  
Population: ~675,000 (2020)  
Form of Government: Strong Mayor  
Boston has a strong mayor-council system. The mayor is directly elected, wields significant executive power (appointments, budget control, veto power), and operates separately from the city council, which focuses on legislation.
Raleigh, North Carolina  
Population: ~467,000 (2020)  
Form of Government: Council-Manager  
Raleigh uses a council-manager system. The mayor is elected citywide and presides over the council, but the city manager, appointed by the council, runs the administration, making the mayor's role more ceremonial than executive.
Summary Table
Rank
City
State
Population (2020)
Form of Government
1
Phoenix
Arizona
1,608,000
Council-Manager
2
Austin
Texas
961,000
Council-Manager
3
Columbus
Ohio
905,000
Strong Mayor
4
Indianapolis
Indiana
887,000
Strong Mayor
5
Denver
Colorado
715,000
Strong Mayor
6
Nashville
Tennessee
689,000
Strong Mayor
7
Oklahoma City
Oklahoma
681,000
Council-Manager
8
Sacramento
California
524,000
Council-Manager
9
Boston
Massachusetts
675,000
Strong Mayor
10
Raleigh
North Carolina
467,000
Council-Manager
Observations
Split Between Systems: Among the top ten U.S. state capital cities by population, five use a council-manager system (Phoenix, Austin, Oklahoma City, Sacramento, Raleigh), and five use a strong mayor system (Columbus, Indianapolis, Denver, Nashville, Boston).
Geographic Trends: Council-manager systems appear more common in the West and Southwest (Phoenix, Austin, Oklahoma City, Sacramento), while strong mayor systems dominate in the Midwest and East (Columbus, Indianapolis, Denver, Nashville, Boston).
Population Correlation: There's no strict correlation between population size and government type here, as both systems are evenly represented across this range (~467,000 to 1.6 million).
If you intended a different ranking (e.g., alphabetically or by another metric) or meant all 50 state capitals, let me know, and I'll adjust the list! This response focuses on the most populous state capitals as the most reasonable interpretation of "top ten" in a U.S. context.

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

Wednesday, February 19, 2025

$$

Federal highway funds in the United States are primarily distributed to states through a structured process managed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), an agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation. Here's how it generally works:
1. Source of Funding
The bulk of federal highway funding comes from the Highway Trust Fund (HTF), established in 1956. The HTF is financed mainly through federal taxes on gasoline (currently 18.4 cents per gallon), diesel fuel (24.4 cents per gallon), and other motor fuels, as well as taxes on truck sales, tires, and heavy vehicle use.
Occasionally, Congress supplements the HTF with general fund appropriations when its revenues fall short, as fuel tax rates haven't been adjusted since 1993 and vehicle fuel efficiency has reduced per-vehicle tax contributions.
2. Legislative Authorization
Federal highway funding is authorized through multi-year transportation bills passed by Congress, such as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) signed into law in November 2021. These bills outline funding levels, programs, and policies for several years (e.g., IIJA covers 2022–2026).
The legislation specifies how much money is available and how it's allocated across various programs.
3. Apportionment to States
Funds are distributed to states annually via a process called apportionment. The FHWA allocates money based on formulas set by Congress in the authorizing legislation. These formulas typically consider factors like:
Road mileage: The extent of a state's public road network, including the National Highway System (NHS).
Vehicle miles traveled (VMT): The amount of traffic on a state's roads.
Population: Particularly for urbanized areas.
Fuel tax contributions: How much a state pays into the HTF.
Special needs: Such as bridge conditions or safety priorities.
For example, under the IIJA, programs like the National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) and the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) use tailored formulas to distribute billions annually.
4. State Role and Matching Funds
Once apportioned, states receive funds as reimbursements. States typically plan and initiate highway projects, then submit costs to the FHWA for reimbursement from their allocated federal funds.
Most programs require states to provide matching funds, often 20% of the project cost (i.e., an 80/20 federal-to-state split), though this can vary. Some emergency or discretionary programs may cover 100% of costs.
States have flexibility within federal guidelines to prioritize projects, whether for interstate highways, bridges, or local roads.
5. Specific Programs
Funds are channeled through various FHWA programs, each with a distinct purpose:
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP): Supports major highways and bridges.
Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG): Flexible funding for a range of road, bridge, and transit projects.
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP): Focuses on reducing fatalities and serious injuries.
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ): Targets traffic congestion and emissions in polluted areas.
Discretionary grants (e.g., INFRA or RAISE grants) are also awarded competitively for specific projects, bypassing the formula process.
6. Obligation and Spending
States don't receive cash upfront. Instead, they're given obligation authority, a limit on how much they can commit to projects each year. This ensures spending aligns with available HTF revenue.
States must use funds within a certain timeframe (often 4 years) or risk losing them, though some programs allow carryover.
7. Oversight and Compliance
The FHWA oversees state spending to ensure compliance with federal standards (e.g., environmental regulations, engineering requirements). States submit plans and reports to justify expenditures.
Example in Practice
In fiscal year 2023, the IIJA apportioned over $52 billion to states for highway programs. California, with its vast road network and population, might receive several billion, while a smaller state like Wyoming gets less, adjusted by the formula factors. Texas, with high VMT and fuel tax contributions, also sees a large share.
This system balances national priorities—like maintaining the Interstate Highway System—with state-specific needs, though debates persist over funding levels, formula fairness, and the HTF's long-term solvency. If you'd like details on a specific state or program, let me know!

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

Thursday, February 13, 2025

Fwd: Good job



Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Christina Valdivia-Alcala <cvaldivia-alcala@topeka.org>
Date: Thu, Feb 13, 2025, 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: Good job
To: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>, Sylvia Davis <sdavis@topeka.org>
Cc: Governing Body <governingbody@topeka.org>


Henry:
I did not vote in support of this project.  I still do not support it.  For assistance with your request - you can go through your council person, Karen Hiller at khiller@topeka.org.  For assistance with the benefit district, please email to Rhiannon Friedman at rmfriedman@topeka.org


Sincerely,


Christina Valdivia-Alcala
District 2 Representative
(785) 233-7110


From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 9:41 PM
To: Christina Valdivia-Alcala <cvaldivia-alcala@topeka.org>; Sylvia Davis <sdavis@topeka.org>
Cc: Governing Body <governingbody@topeka.org>
Subject: Fwd: Good job
 
Notice: -----This message was sent by an external sender-----

If we can change the language in benefit districts, the developer will get the fees for the usage until the district retires. 

I can get my bank to see it as financeable.

H

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:57 PM
Subject: Fwd: Good job
To: Michael Hall <mghall@topeka.org>, Rhiannon M. Friedman <rmfriedman@topeka.org>
Cc: Walker Bassett <wfbassett99@gmail.com>, Tyler Wible <wible.pd@gmail.com>, Craig McCullah <craig.allen.mccullah@gmail.com>


Let's do an RHID and make it an affordable housing project for single-family homes. +

H

[scrap the duplexes] 


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Craig McCullah <craig.allen.mccullah@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: Good job
To: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>


Hi Henry,

West Rochester consists of approximately 23 acres or prime residential land currently zoned R-1 in the highly sought after Seaman School District. Shawnee County has the expansion of Rochester Road to 3 lanes in 2028, complete with sidewalks making access walkable to retailers to the south (including Dillons and Walmart). 

East Rochester consists of 7.2 acres that has been rezoned M2 for duplexes and fourplexes for a total of 30 units (see attached PUD Master Plan).  This parcel comes with architectural plans for duplexes and fourplexes. 

Please let me know if you have any questions.

-Craig






On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 7:14 AM Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com> wrote:
Craig 

I need to get this package to walker asap 

Please 

H

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Walker Bassett <wbassett@gen-iii.com>
Date: Wed, Feb 12, 2025, 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: Good job
To: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>, Walker Bassett <wfbassett99@gmail.com>


Thanks, what's this att deal you keep posting about?

From: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 10:58:59 PM
To: Walker Bassett <wfbassett99@gmail.com>
Subject: Good job
 
Nice work 

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals


--
Henry McClure 
Time kills deals
785-383-9994

www.henrymcclure.live


--
Henry McClure 
Time kills deals
785-383-9994

www.henrymcclure.live

Monday, February 10, 2025

jame - revise my websites


when you land on the home page it is the articles

delete the words [blogs] [about] and [inquire]

do you understand 



 




page 2





 

Saturday, February 1, 2025

Watch "Adam Schiff HUMILIATED! Brave Congresswoman Gets up and RIPS Schiff to SHREDS" on YouTube

https://youtu.be/dkWOgIqabTc?si=WNbk5h4LShQfGk3O

Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

Fwd: AVOID these fattening fruits & veggies



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Steven Gundry, MD <newsletter@gundrymd.com>
Date: Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 8:08 AM
Subject: AVOID these fattening fruits & veggies
To: Henry McClure <mcre13@gmail.com>


These "skinny foods" can actually ADD inches to your waistline. Here's what to avoid: ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­
Henry, there's something seriously wrong with the health food in our grocery stores...

And there's a very good chance you and your loved ones have been exposed.

I recently did a deep dive into our agricultural system. And, well…

I discovered a shocking "health destroyer" in the U.S. food supply that can make you to GAIN weight no matter what you eat.

It has nothing to do with pesticides, GMOs, or even lectins.

It's actually something much worse.

And if you do your grocery shopping at any major U.S. grocery chain…

I can almost guarantee this "health destroyer" is adding inches to your waistline

Even if you eat a very clean diet.

So that's the bad news. Onto the good news:

It turns out this problem is actually super easy to avoid!

Just do one thing before your next trip to the grocery store.

Looking out for you,

Steven Gundry, MD
P.S. The worst part about this "health destroyer" is that it affects basically every major food group.

So whether you're a vegan, vegetarian, pure carnivore, or somewhere in between…

This "health destroyer" is likely sitting in your kitchen right now.

Like I said, there's a very simple way to avoid it, and start looking AND feeling better almost immediately.

This email was sent to mcre13@gmail.com by Gundry MD
Manage Preferences | VIP Discounts | Join Text Club

23251 Mulholland Drive Woodland Hills, California 91364
These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.





You received this email from Gundry MD.
If you would like to unsubscribe, click here.


--
Henry McClure 
Time kills deals
785-383-9994

www.henrymcclure.live