Sunday, January 25, 2026

Deals

https://www.crexi.com/properties/2157965/Kansas




Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

Landman

Odessa and Midland, located about 20 miles apart in West Texas, form a closely linked metropolitan area known as the "Petroplex" or "Midessa". While historically bitter rivals, they now share a, largely, economically interdependent relationship driven by the oil industry, often acting as a single, combined economic and cultural region in the Permian Basin. [1, 2, 3]  
Key Aspects of the Relationship: 

• Economic Cooperation: Together they form the core of the Permian Basin's oil and gas industry. The relationship has evolved from intense rivalry to cooperative economic development, as described by Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midland%E2%80%93Odessa). 
• Proximity: The cities are only 20-22 miles apart, connected by Interstate 20, making daily commuting for work common, according to Rome2Rio (https://www.rome2rio.com/s/Midland-TX-USA/Odessa-TX-USA). 
• Regional Identity: They are often referred to as a single unit ("Midland-Odessa" or "Midessa") for media, airport services (Midland International Air & Space Port), and economic data, say Wikipedia contributors. 
• Cultural Rivalry: Despite the economic partnership, a friendly, long-standing, and sometimes intense competition exists, particularly between their high school football teams (Midland High vs. Odessa High), notes The Hennessey Group (https://thehennesseygroup.com/midland-odessa-rivalry/). 
• Distinct Character: While connected, they maintain distinct identities: Midland is generally considered more white-collar and corporate, while Odessa is often seen as more blue-collar and industrial, say Wikipedia contributors. [1, 2, 3]  

They are effectively sister cities that function as a single, combined Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) in the oil-rich Permian Basin. 

AI responses may include mistakes.




Henry McClure  
785.383.9994
sent from mobile 📱
time kills deals

GOOD BYE

In our fast-paced, modern world, the microwave oven has become a staple appliance in nearly every kitchen. It offers unparalleled convenience, allowing us to heat leftovers in seconds and defrost meals at the push of a button. However, this relentless pursuit of convenience often comes at a hidden cost to our health. While it may seem harmless, relying on a microwave to cook or reheat food is a habit that can negatively impact the nutritional value of our food and introduce harmful chemicals into our bodies.

First and foremost, the very mechanism that makes a microwave fast is what makes it unhealthy. Microwaves heat food by causing water molecules to vibrate at extremely high speeds, which can destroy the delicate structure of vitamins, minerals, and enzymes present in food. Studies have shown that microwaving can lead to a significant loss of nutrients, particularly when cooking vegetables, which are high in heat-sensitive vitamins. When we consume food that has been stripped of its nutritional value, we are essentially feeding our bodies calories without the essential nutrients required for optimal health.

Furthermore, the issue of nutrient destruction is compounded by the problem of uneven cooking. Microwaves are notorious for creating "cold spots" in food. These cold spots are not just inconvenient; they are dangerous. If the food is not heated evenly, it allows for the survival of bacteria, which can lead to foodborne illnesses.

Perhaps one of the most alarming, yet often overlooked, dangers of microwave use is the leaching of chemicals from plastics. When we reheat our food in plastic containers or wrappers, the high heat can cause harmful substances like BPA (bisphenol A) and phthalates to migrate from the plastic into our food. These chemicals are known as endocrine disruptors, meaning they can interfere with our hormonal systems and have been linked to a variety of health problems, including obesity, infertility, and developmental issues in children.

In addition to the dangers posed by nutrient loss and chemical leaching, there is the issue of the radiation itself. While it is true that modern microwaves are designed to contain the radiation, they are not perfect. Over time, the seals can wear out, potentially allowing for the leakage of low-level radiation. While the FDA asserts that these levels are safe, some experts advise against standing directly in front of a microwave while it is operating to avoid any potential exposure.

Finally, we must consider the long-term, subtle effects of constantly consuming food that has been structurally altered by artificial radiation. While the immediate effects of a single meal might be minimal, the cumulative impact of years of eating microwaved food is still not fully understood. In an era where chronic diseases are on the rise, we should be scrutinizing all aspects of our lifestyle, and that includes the way we cook our food.

In conclusion, while the convenience of a microwave is hard to ignore, the potential risks to our health are simply too great. From the destruction of vital nutrients to the, the leaching of harmful chemicals into our meals, and the potential for radiation exposure, the microwave oven is, in many ways, an unhealthy addition to our kitchens. To prioritize our long-term health and well-being, it is worth considering alternative, healthier cooking methods.


AI responses may include mistakes.


--
Henry McClure 
Time kills deals
785-383-9994

www.henrymcclure.live

more wheat

High-end apartments in Topeka's 66614 zip code (primarily standalone or garden-style multifamily communities in suburban southwest Topeka, like The Residences at Auburn Hills or similar upscale complexes) contrast notably with newer apartment developments that incorporate a "rental center" model. This likely refers to mixed-use or integrated rental office/retail setups—where apartments sit above or adjacent to a central leasing/rental office, convenience retail, or community services hub (common in modern multifamily to streamline management, add resident convenience, and boost appeal).
Topeka has limited large-scale new high-end construction in 66614 specifically (most recent big projects are downtown, southeast, or affordable/mixed-income elsewhere, like the $60M Union at Tower District or downtown 192-250 unit complexes announced in 2024-2025). However, comparing the typical standalone high-end 66614-style apartments (e.g., existing or potential new builds in suburban pockets) versus apartments built over/around a rental center (a more integrated, amenity-forward design seen in some newer Topeka-area or national trends) highlights key differences and similarities in success potential.Key Similarities
  • Target Market and Demand Drivers: Both appeal to similar renter profiles—professionals, families, and higher-income households seeking modern, low-maintenance living. Topeka's stable economy (government, healthcare, logistics) supports demand for quality rentals at accessible prices ($1,200–$2,000+/month range for premium units).
  • Amenity Focus for Success: High-end features (e.g., pools, fitness centers, smart home tech, modern finishes) drive occupancy in both formats. Newer builds emphasize this to compete with older stock.
  • Economic Viability in Topeka: Both benefit from the city's affordability edge (rents far below national averages), steady (if modest) population/job growth, and undersupply of premium options.
Key Differences and Contrast
Aspect
Standalone High-End Apartments (e.g., in 66614 suburban style)
Apartments Built Over/Integrated with a Rental Center (Mixed-Use/Convenience Hub)
Location & Lifestyle
Suburban, quieter, more residential feel; often near shopping (Wanamaker Rd area), parks, and highways for easy commutes. Appeals to those wanting space and tranquility.
Often more urban/edge-urban or mixed-use; rental center adds on-site convenience (leasing office, package lockers, small retail/coffee, resident events space). Feels more "community-centric" and walkable internally.
Design & Layout
Typically low/mid-rise garden-style or mid-rise buildings with individual buildings/clusters; more traditional parking and green space.
Multi-story buildings with ground-floor or podium-level rental center/retail; apartments "over" the hub for efficient land use. More vertical/urban feel, even in suburbs.
Amenities & Convenience
Strong on resort-style perks (pools, clubhouses, dog parks); but leasing/management may be separate.
Built-in "hub" boosts daily convenience (on-site leasing, maintenance, events, potential retail like gym or cafe). Enhances perceived value and resident retention.
Target Appeal
Attracts privacy-seekers, families, or down-sizers who prioritize suburban calm over integrated services. Strong in 66614's established upscale pockets.
Appeals to younger professionals, remote workers, or those valuing "live-work-play" convenience. Better for lifestyle-focused renters.
Development Cost & Scale
Lower land intensity; easier to phase in smaller projects. Potentially higher per-unit costs for premium finishes but simpler approvals.
Higher upfront costs for mixed-use elements (retail build-out, shared spaces); suits larger-scale projects but can command higher rents via added value.
Market Success Factors in Topeka
Proven in existing 66614 complexes (e.g., Auburn Hills area); succeeds via location perks and Topeka's low competition in true luxury suburban rentals. Lower risk if demand stays steady.
Emerging in Topeka (more common downtown or in revitalization areas); could outperform if Topeka sees more hybrid work/urban-suburban blending. Higher upside for occupancy but needs strong management to leverage the center.
Potential Drawbacks
May feel dated without constant upgrades; less "buzz" than integrated designs.
Risk of noise/vibration from ground-level activity; higher maintenance for shared spaces. Less ideal in purely residential suburban zones like core 66614.
In summary, standalone high-end apartments in 66614 succeed by leveraging the zip code's suburban desirability, established affluence, and straightforward appeal to renters wanting premium living without urban density. Apartments built over a rental center offer a more modern, convenient, community-oriented experience that could command premium rents and higher retention in Topeka's evolving market—especially if developers target growing demand for integrated amenities. The "rental center" model might edge out in long-term success for new builds by differentiating from standard offerings, but 66614's suburban standalone format remains a safer, proven winner for high-end success given current local trends and limited mixed-use high-end activity in that specific area.


--
Henry McClure 
Time kills deals
785-383-9994

www.henrymcclure.live

High - end apartments in Topeka, KS.


High-end apartments in Topeka, KS 66614 (a southwestern zip code covering desirable, suburban areas like near Wanamaker Road, relatively upscale neighborhoods, and proximity to shopping/entertainment) have strong potential for success due to several converging factors in the local market.
Improving Economic Foundation and Job MarketTopeka has shown solid economic momentum. The metro area ranked No. 5 nationally for economic strength in recent assessments (e.g., Area Development's 2024 Leading Metro Locations report). Since 2020, Topeka/Shawnee County added nearly 2,000 residents, with local economy growth around 6%. Kansas overall has seen job recovery above pre-pandemic levels, with ongoing (though slower) employment gains projected into 2025-2026. State government, healthcare, education, and distribution/logistics sectors drive stable employment in Topeka, supporting a reliable base of middle-to-upper-middle-income professionals who can afford premium rents.Demand for Quality Rental Options in Growing/Desirable Areas66614 features higher home values than much of Topeka (median around $229,000–$230,000, with some luxury single-family listings), indicating a more affluent demographic pocket compared to the citywide median household income (~$55,000–$57,000). Residents here seek modern, amenity-rich living without single-family home maintenance. Existing luxury or higher-end complexes (e.g., Wheatfield Village, The Residences at Auburn Hills, Emory Lakes) command premium pricing (often $1,500–$2,000+/month for nicer units), showing demand for upscale multifamily options. New high-end developments can fill a gap, as much of Topeka's rental stock remains more budget-oriented (citywide median rent ~$900–$1,200).Affordability Advantage Attracts Upscale RentersTopeka's overall cost of living and housing remains significantly below national averages (housing ~26% cheaper). This makes "high-end" apartments feel like a luxury upgrade without coastal-level prices, appealing to:
  • Young professionals and dual-income households.
  • Relocating state workers or remote/hybrid employees.
  • Retirees/down-sizers wanting low-maintenance luxury.
  • People priced out of buying in hotter markets elsewhere but wanting premium features (e.g., modern finishes, pools, fitness centers, smart tech).
Limited Supply and Market TrendsWhile Topeka isn't experiencing explosive population booms, steady growth + low inventory in premium segments creates opportunity. Multifamily construction has been limited historically, but positive home sales trends (e.g., increases in recent years) and interest in newer properties signal room for well-positioned high-end rentals to thrive, especially in 66614's more convenient, suburban southwest location.In short, high-end apartments succeed here by offering elevated lifestyle amenities at prices far more accessible than in major metros, targeting a growing segment of stable, higher-earning residents who value quality without extreme costs. Success hinges on strong location, modern design, and robust amenities to differentiate from standard rentals.

--
Henry McClure 
Time kills deals
785-383-9994

www.henrymcclure.live